Re: extraNatural and key changes

2011-01-18 Thread James Bailey
On Jun 28, 2009, at 10:38 AM, David Bobroff wrote: > When using 'extraNatural = ##f' key cancellations at key changes are not > complete. Key signature elements which change between sharp and flat on the > same note names are not canceled. > > Feature? > Known issue? > Bug? > > -David > > \

Re: [Ping] extraNatural and key changes

2011-01-17 Thread Keith OHara
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 15:16:07 -0800, James Bailey wrote: On Jan 15, 2011, at 12:48 AM, Keith OHara wrote: It looks like Lilypond /never/ printed all the canceling naturals, until Rune added the logic to find them all just before 2.10.3. At that time he made his enhancement optional, contro

Re: [Ping] extraNatural and key changes

2011-01-17 Thread James Bailey
On Jan 15, 2011, at 12:48 AM, Keith OHara wrote: > On Thu, 13 Jan 2011 15:31:21 -0800, Keith OHara wrote: > >> The code causing this behavior appeared [...] >> so the behavior I dislike would have first appeared in 2.10.3. > >> Keith, >> >> You say this appeared in 2.10.3. In which stable re

Re: [Ping] extraNatural and key changes

2011-01-14 Thread Keith OHara
On Thu, 13 Jan 2011 15:31:21 -0800, Keith OHara wrote: The code causing this behavior appeared [...] so the behavior I dislike would have first appeared in 2.10.3. Keith, You say this appeared in 2.10.3. In which stable release was the behaviour correct? Phil, I had trouble running 2

Re: [Ping] extraNatural and key changes

2011-01-14 Thread Phil Holmes
"Keith OHara" wrote in message news:op.vo9syj0ekr5sjt@ohara... On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 14:34:43 -0800, Graham Percival wrote: On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 10:26 PM, Keith OHara wrote: P.S. I would be easily capable of this patch once I figure out git: I hope that you have read http://lilypond.org

[Ping] extraNatural and key changes

2011-01-13 Thread Keith OHara
On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 14:34:43 -0800, Graham Percival wrote: On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 10:26 PM, Keith OHara wrote: P.S. I would be easily capable of this patch once I figure out git: I hope that you have read http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentation/contributor/using-lily_002dgit Dear B

Re: extraNatural and key changes

2010-12-13 Thread Keith OHara
Graham Percival percival-music.ca> writes: > On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 10:26 PM, Keith OHara oco.net> > wrote: > > P.S. I would be easily capable of this patch once I figure out git: > > I hope that you have read > http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentation/contributor/using-lily_002dgit > Okay

Re: extraNatural and key changes

2010-12-13 Thread Graham Percival
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 10:26 PM, Keith OHara wrote: > P.S. I would be easily capable of this patch once I figure out git: I hope that you have read http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentation/contributor/using-lily_002dgit Don't be stupid by trying to use command-line git. We've spent approxim

Re: extraNatural and key changes

2010-12-13 Thread Keith OHara
Neil Puttock gmail.com> writes: > > 2009/6/28 David Bobroff centrum.is>: > > When using 'extraNatural = ##f' key cancellations at key changes are not > > complete.  Key signature elements which change between sharp and flat on the > > same note names are not canceled. > > > > Feature? > > Yes.

Re: extraNatural and key changes

2009-06-28 Thread Neil Puttock
2009/6/28 David Bobroff : > When using 'extraNatural = ##f' key cancellations at key changes are not > complete.  Key signature elements which change between sharp and flat on the > same note names are not canceled. > > Feature? Yes. It's deliberately set this way in the Key_engraver. Regards, N

extraNatural and key changes

2009-06-28 Thread David Bobroff
When using 'extraNatural = ##f' key cancellations at key changes are not complete. Key signature elements which change between sharp and flat on the same note names are not canceled. Feature? Known issue? Bug? -David \version "2.13.0" \score { \relative { \set Staff.extraNatural = ##f