Graham Percival <graham <at> percival-music.ca> writes: > On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 10:26 PM, Keith OHara <k-ohara5a5a <at> oco.net> > wrote: > > P.S. I would be easily capable of this patch once I figure out git: > > I hope that you have read > http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentation/contributor/using-lily_002dgit > Okay. The patch as produced by lily-git, has been mailed to lilynet, with a link to this thread.
So, does anybody know *any* reason one would want the incomplete key cancellation that Lilypond currently generates? If so, would it be reasonable to specify such a keySignature explicitly, as documented under "Non-traditional key signatures"? <http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.12/Documentation/user/lilypond/Displaying-pitches> -Keith _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
