Re: Documentation error in PDF files

2018-02-25 Thread Peter Toye
James, Thank you. As I've said elsewhere, I'd do it myself if I know how to! Best regards, Peter mailto:lilyp...@ptoye.com www.ptoye.com - Sunday, February 25, 2018, 11:32:58 AM, James Lowe wrote: > Hello Peter, > On Sat, 17 Feb 2018 10:26:05 +, Peter Toye > wrote

Re: Documentation error in PDF files

2018-02-25 Thread James Lowe
Hello Peter, On Sat, 17 Feb 2018 10:26:05 +, Peter Toye wrote: > The indexes in the PDF versions of the learning and notation manuals (and > maybe others) do not have the alphabetical "jump to" headers, which makes > scrolling a pain. They're in the HTML versions, so I can only assume this

Documentation error in PDF files

2018-02-17 Thread Peter Toye
The indexes in the PDF versions of the learning and notation manuals (and maybe others) do not have the alphabetical "jump to" headers, which makes scrolling a pain. They're in the HTML versions, so I can only assume this is a bug in the translation from the info format. Best regards, Peter

'make doc' should generate translated PDF files of website [WAS: Re: How to extract PDF of translated documentation?]

2013-01-13 Thread Federico Bruni
cumentation/web/development.es.html Anyway, translated versions of PDF files were never generated (going back up to 2.13): http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/ We would expect to have the translated PDF, as in any other manual. I've opened an issue in the tracker: http://code.g

lilypond-book produces PDF files even when not needed

2006-08-11 Thread Mats Bengtsson
Hi, Since the PDF output support was added to lilypond-book, PDF versions of every lily-NN-N.eps file are produced even if you run lilypond-book without the --pdf flag. Apart from taking extra time, this is also (as far as I can see) the cause of the bug described in http://lists.gnu.org/arch

Re: PDF files are almost 2 orders of magnitude bigger on 2.7 than on 2.6

2006-02-24 Thread Laura Conrad
>>>>> "LC" == Laura Conrad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: LC> In addition, the friend who drew my attention to this problem found LC> that neither the 2.6 nor the 2.7 pdf files would display correctly LC> with Acrobat 3.0 on Mac OS 9. Is this a

PDF files are almost 2 orders of magnitude bigger on 2.7 than on 2.6

2006-02-24 Thread Laura Conrad
The attached small lilypond file (but as far as I know, all lilypond files) compiles on both 2.6 and 2.7 (this morning's CVS). However, the pdf files are very different sizes: -rw-r--r-- 1 newlily newlily 13035 Feb 24 14:40 test-2.6.pdf -rw-r--r-- 1 newlily newlily 665766 Feb 24 14:38

Re: PDF files

2005-07-07 Thread stk
#x27;m sending him a copy of this. ==> Note: the material below is a copy of my post to lilypond-user (with subject Re: pdf files) on 2005 July 7. -- Tom *** Running under Windows 98, LilyPond generates .PS, not .PDF, fi

Re: PDF files

2005-07-03 Thread stk
I have 3 independent gswin32.exe installed on my system running on Win98SE (for Ghostscript versions 5.50, 8.51, and 8.15 -- where the 8.15 version is for LilyPond). I got into a DOS window (which has a command line). I went to each of the three directories containing a gswin32.exe, and for e

Re: PDF files

2005-07-02 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Sacha Standen writes: > I've still not figured out where to type '--verbose', but have attached the > ps log from a document I'm trying to generate a PDF for in case it helps. Huh? Processing a PS file with LilyPond certainly does not help :-) > # -*-compilation-*- > Changing working directory

Re: PDF files

2005-07-02 Thread Sacha Standen
> Then you may have some learning to do > > I or others can give you more help if necessary. > > Paul Scott > > That would be kind, thanks. It looks like I need it. Are we talking about MS-DOS here? If I go to the Start menu, I get a number of options (my system's in French to complicate matters)

Re: PDF files

2005-07-02 Thread Sacha Standen
" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Sent: Saturday, July 02, 2005 8:28 AM Subject: Re: PDF files > Sacha Standen writes: > > > I 've already uninstalled Cygwin and the old version of Lilypond to try to > > prevent conflict problems. > > Good. Can you then try reinstallin

Re: PDF files

2005-07-02 Thread Paul Scott
Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: Yes, that's what I mean: this is a Cygwin configuration, the native installation only supports dragging the .ly file and dropping onto LilyPond, or right click: Generate PDF. I think I can safely disagree. I haven't never installed Cygwin on the machine I am testing

Re: PDF files

2005-07-01 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Sacha Standen writes: > I 've already uninstalled Cygwin and the old version of Lilypond to try to > prevent conflict problems. Good. Can you then try reinstalling native lilypond again? > Double clicking to generate PDFs or right clicking and selecting > 'open' does the same thing. Is there a

Re: PDF files

2005-07-01 Thread Paul Scott
Sacha Standen wrote: Jan I 've already uninstalled Cygwin and the old version of Lilypond to try to prevent conflict problems. Double clicking to generate PDFs or right clicking and selecting 'open' does the same thing. Is there another way of opening them? Where's the command line and what's

Re: PDF files

2005-07-01 Thread Sacha Standen
7;s the Lilypond shortcut on the desktop? I'm not computer literate - apologies. Sacha - Original Message - From: "Jan Nieuwenhuizen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Sacha Standen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Sent: Friday, July 01, 2005 10:08 PM Subject: Re: PDF fi

Re: PDF files

2005-07-01 Thread Paul Scott
Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: Sacha Standen writes: I then double click on the newly created Lilypond file, which creates a PS file Do you have Cygwin version of LilyPond installed? Double click to generate is not yet used by the native version of lilypond, but the Cygwin installation ha

Re: PDF files

2005-07-01 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Sacha Standen writes: > I then double click on the newly created Lilypond file, which > creates a PS file Do you have Cygwin version of LilyPond installed? Double click to generate is not yet used by the native version of lilypond, but the Cygwin installation has that configuration. > and conti

PDF files

2005-07-01 Thread Sacha Standen
Hi I'm beginning to wonder if my problem is at my end or if it's a bug. I've mailed the user list a number of times and have only got a couple of answers, neither of which solved the problem, so was wondering if whoever programmes the Windows version knows the answer. I had an answer from Paul

Re: Very large PS and PDF files created by 2.5 on SuSE 9.3

2005-06-15 Thread Imruska
Now, however, the size of the ps and pdf files are enormous. Are you using point-and-click? I believe that it's enabled by default. See the docs on point-and-click on how to turn this off. (point-and-click makes the pdf files much larger) Thanks, this was the problem. Pothárn

Re: Very large PS and PDF files created by 2.5 on SuSE 9.3

2005-06-14 Thread Graham Percival
On 14-Jun-05, at 7:13 AM, Imruska wrote: Now, however, the size of the ps and pdf files are enormous. Are you using point-and-click? I believe that it's enabled by default. See the docs on point-and-click on how to turn this off. (point-and-click makes the pdf files much larger) C

Very large PS and PDF files created by 2.5 on SuSE 9.3

2005-06-14 Thread Imruska
. (Since, as I believe, 2.5.x does not use tetex any longer.) Now, however, the size of the ps and pdf files are enormous. A one-page choir score for 4 voices, produces a 1,0 MB ps and a 129,5 KB pdf file, Lilypond 2.4.5 produced from the same source a 25,6 KB pdf file (I did not keep the ps