I used to get notifications of releases on the list. I’ve not
seen anything since 2.19.13. Is this intentional or an oversight? I
notice the latest patches are going into 2.19.16, and latest available
is 2.19.15.
Cheers, Ian
___
bug-lilypond mailing
On 14/08/13 22:20, Trevor Daniels wrote:
>
>>> I propose that we remove string addition from assignments.
>>> It's unlikely anybody was aware of it in the last 10 years, and
>>> it's not like it is documented.
>>
>> +1
>
> +1
>
> Trevor
>
1+
___
bug
My main interest is to obtain ukulele transcriptions.
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
h is before the call
and it looks fine if I run it up without gdb and with --loglevel=DEBUG.
Here's a vanilla gdb session using Han-Wen's .gdbinit, the pwd is the
build directory under the lilypond git directory:
-------
ian
ght
\fromproperty #'header:tagline
}
\bold \fontsize #3 %\on-the-fly #not-first-page
\fromproperty #'page:page-number-string
}
}
#}
Gives these diagnosics:
Processing
`/home/ian/Dropbox/MusicScoresDevelopment/Zado
current development, but it
looks like we have got a problem in the development cycle.
>
> I'm forwarding this thread to lilypond-devel as it may be of
> interest to the devs.
>
Werner, if this is reproducible it will need a tracker and patch and
everything to go through the review proc
/cmd /S/
>
> Yes that is what I meant. CMD is just an exe like any other.
>
> You can start it with /S /C options.
>
Looked in
http://www.microsoft.com/resources/documentation/windows/xp/all/proddocs/en-us/ntcmds.mspx?mfr=true
And it said
Use cmd /s /k to do the string stuff and keep the win
back in the day.
The folks over there should be able to give you, us in LilyPond and
GNUCash a steer as to how we can all play nicely together and behave
properly on your system,
Cheers,
Ian Hulin
P.S. to Graham/bug-squad: how do we handle this sort of issue for
LilyPond, if it looks like it's
ommand-line option name which is handled at scheme
level rather from within the C++ code.
Quite often they are boolean flags so they default to using #t or #f
(because they are handled using scheme). In other cases, like
loglevel, they can use a whole set of string values.
Maybe this?
-d[
On 26/02/12 18:51, lilyp...@googlecode.com wrote:
>
> Comment #10 on issue 2343 by d...@gnu.org: Faulty file-naming when
> outputting multiple \books
> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2343
>
> Ian, the patch does not change the use of "output-suffix&qu
ommand-line and type
guile> %load-path
You should see something like:
guile> %load-path
("/usr/local/share/guile/site" "/usr/local/share/guile/1.8"
"/usr/local/share/guile")
guile>
Cheers,
Ian
On 21/01/12 13:20, Damian leGassick wrote:
>
> On 21
Hi Julien,
On 11/01/12 21:48, Julien Rioux wrote:
> On 11/01/2012 3:58 PM, Ian Hulin wrote:
>> Hi all I'm running make doc-stage-1 after
>>
>> $ cd build $ git checkout master $ ../configure
>> --disable-optimising $ make $ make test-baseline $ git checkout
>
Hi all I'm running make doc-stage-1 after
$ cd build
$ git checkout master
$ ../configure --disable-optimising
$ make
$ make test-baseline
$ git checkout T2026-1
$ make test-clean
$ make check
$ make doc-clean
Make doc-clean fails with:
.
.
.
/home/ian/src/lilypond/stepmake/stepmake/ge
fix be verified, please?
Once 2026 is pushed and verified, use
git grep -n -C 10 conditional-circle-markup
to check it's defined in scm/define-markuo-commands.scm.
Or merge it into 2026 as a duplicate and let verification of 2026 deal
with it.
Cheers,
Ian
This issue will be fixed by Issue 2026, currently at Patch_review
status. The markup was moved into scm/define-markup-commands.scm and
will now be defined in the (scm markup-facility-defs) module.
Ian Hulin
On 30/12/11 18:17, lilyp...@googlecode.com wrote:
>
> Comment #11 on issue 1
i where i >= 0 as positive.
Or if you want to stick to Guiles /positive?/, maybe use
/positive-integer-or-zero?/.
Predicate names seem to work better if they describe what they're
testing for rather than what's being avoided.
It's better of they're positive . . .
Cheer
velopment for that patch.
Let us know your findings, or if it's a log, mail it to me off list.
Cheers,
Ian Hulin
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
e, numbers as valid characters in Lily
identifiers, or providing some sort of arrays/vectors/subscripted
variables facility in Lily?
If it's the latter, how would we "declare violin as an array"?
Maybe
\array violin 2
and access it as
violin[1] = {...}
violin[2] = {...}
O
Hi David,
On 22/11/11 14:02, David Kastrup wrote:
> David Kastrup writes:
>
>> Ian Hulin writes:
>>
>>> This is forwarded from the Guile bug list. Bug-squad please
>>> create a LilyPond issue for this - we need to change our code:
>>>
>>&g
This is forwarded from the Guile bug list. Bug-squad please create a
LilyPond issue for this - we need to change our code:
Files affected appear (according to git grep) to be:
lily/mensural-ligature.cc
lily/system.cc
scm/c++.scm
scm/define-event-classes.scm
scm/music-functions.scm
Cheers,
Ian
ot commented on the issue on Rietveld.
You have not contacted me in any way either via the list or privately
raising any concerns re this patch.
You have royally pissed me off.
Ian
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
lls Guile V1.8.8, I know this shouldn't make any
difference, but. . .
Cheers,
Ian
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Hi David
On 08/11/11 08:45, David Kastrup wrote:
> Ian Hulin writes:
>
>> o Move all the markup macros and markup definition procedures to a new
>> (scm markup-facility-defs) module (this is the artist formerly known
>> markup-macros.scm and the remaining code in mark
LilyPond build when running with Guile V1.8.*.
It'll also give me chance to play with Graham's new git-cl.
Cheers,
Ian
On 06/11/11 19:58, Colin Campbell wrote:
> On 11-11-06 10:41 AM, Phil Holmes wrote:
>> "Ian Hulin" wrote in message
>> news:j96bvt$19b$1...@do
cm and main.cc, and when this one is reviewed,
counted down and pushed, then we can verify the issue.
By the way, the criteria for verifying all of these patches is that
they do no harm when running the LilyPond regression tests using Guile
1.8.
Cheers,
Ian Hulin
Hi Graham,
On 15/04/11 11:17, Graham Percival wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 09:43:51PM +0100, Ian Hulin wrote:
>> `/home/ian/lilypond/build/Documentation/out-www/essay/literature.texi'...
>> Processing include: colorado.itexi
>> lilypond-book.py: error: file not fou
Hi all,
Is this a known problem (tail of make docs output)
.
.
.
Compiling
/home/ian/lilypond/build/Documentation/out-www/essay/engraving.texi...
Writing
`/home/ian/lilypond/build/Documentation/out-www/essay/engraving.texi'...
Processing include: essay/literature.itely
Reading /home/ian/lil
Hi Neil,
On 18/08/10 22:36, lilyp...@googlecode.com wrote:
>
> Comment #3 on issue 1224 by n.puttock: Remove Lilypond's use of
> %module-public-interface, which is deprecated in guile V2.0
> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1224
>
> Ian, which version o
If a staff is included in a group like a GrandStaff or StaffGroup, the
grouping bracket graphic pushes the shortinstumentName string off the
left hand edge of the output PDF document. I've attached a demonstration.
Tested with 2.13.17, 2.13.29 and 2.13.30.
Cheers,
Ian
\version &q
Hi Patrick,
On 26/06/10 02:43, Patrick McCarty wrote:
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 10:43 AM, Ian Hulin wrote:
We have these blocks in our C++ code base:
$ git grep -A 5 MODULE_GC_KLUDGE
lily/include/ly-module.hh:#define MODULE_GC_KLUDGE
lily/include/ly-module.hh-
lily/include/ly-module.hh
{ \new Staff { ... }
\layout { }
\midi { }
}
}
etc.
Though any .pdf files generated will also be called track-one.pdf,
track-two.pdf etc.
Hope this helps,
Cheers,
Ian Hulin
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Sorry all,
Sent the original to the development list by mistake.
Cheers,
Ian Hulin
Original Message
Subject: Remove kludge in Module Code to support Guile V1.6
(MODULE_GC_KLUDGE conditional compilation)
Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 18:32:32 +0100
From: Ian Hulin
To: lilypond-de
ed_struct* (*)(void*,
scm_unused_struct*, scm_unused_struct*, scm_unused_struct*), void*,
scm_unused_struct*, scm_unused_struct*)'
make[1]: *** [out/general-scheme.o] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/ian/usr/src/lilypond/lily'
make: *** [all] Error 2
Anything I'
Hi Neil,
Here's the amended patch.
Cheers,
Ian
On 22/02/10 22:17, n.putt...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2010/02/22 18:27:19, Ian Hulin wrote:
Sorry if this sounds a bit jobsworth but I'd rather this patch went
out
the door as is and I'll look at your comment as part of work o
http://codereview.appspot.com/194095/diff/2001/1003
File lily/tuplet-bracket.cc (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/194095/diff/2001/1003#newcode4
lily/tuplet-bracket.cc:4: Copyright (C) 1997--2009 Jan Nieuwenhuizen
On 2010/02/22 22:18:10, Neil Puttock wrote:
rebase again?
Done.
http://c
On 20/02/10 17:27, n.putt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Ian,
Looks OK, though don't you think it would be better to increase the size
of the bracket if it's too small?
We--ll, yes, but that's not what this bug report is about. As it's
something you've picked up during
Reviewers: Neil Puttock,
Message:
Hi Neil,
I've fixed the comment. Please push this patch (I've rebased it to
branch from latest origin/master).
Cheers,
Ian
http://codereview.appspot.com/194095/diff/1/2
File lily/tuplet-bracket.cc (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/19409
How about "bug blatters" (Douglas Adams fans may recognize the reference)
Cheers,
Ian
On 01/02/10 04:45, Graham Percival wrote:
Hi all,
Let's welcome Dmytro to the bug team. He's finished checking the
regtests, so now I'm teaching him about other bug tasks. Like
On 26/01/10 01:37, Neil Puttock wrote:
2010/1/24 Ian Hulin:
I've had a quick look at this with gdb, stepping through
Tuplet_bracket:print, and the solution doesn't seem as simple as you suggest
here, Â I even tried patching in a modified routine implementing the override
if the prope
\score {
output-suffix = "movI"
.
.
.
}
or
\score {
output-file = "MyGrandOpus"
.
.
.
}
I'm willing to continue working on this.
Maybe this is the kind of discussion for GLISS?
Cheers,
Ian
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lil
s simple as you
suggest here, I even tried patching in a modified routine implementing
the override if the property is set, but it doesn't do the job.
I've attached the patch, also attached is the lily source file I
compiled and the pdf it produced.
or: unterminated lyrics argument
for \addlyrics, could not detect separate closing '}' character
and then stop the compilation?
Cheers,
Ian Hulin
On 06/01/10 10:55, lilyp...@googlecode.com wrote:
Status: New
Owner:
New issue 961 by amuraivel: Þrows error upon using character co
Graham,
Was just looking in CG section 6.2. Does Status value *Accepted* mean
that the defect is definitely reproducible by more than one person on
more than one computer? Is this one of the bugmeister's criteria for
accepting an issue? If it isn't, should it be?
Ch
Hi Graham,
Graham Percival wrote:
I wanted to wait until GOP started, but it seems there's a lot of
interest in this now. Here's my proposed new classifications for
issues.
There are four hopefully-not-really-contradictory goals, listed in order:
1. easy for core developers to find the type of
Neil Puttock wrote:
2009/11/22 Francisco Vila :
2009/11/22 Ian Hulin :
If you do this as a function, I suggest you call it \notenames,
\notenames "italiano"
\notenames "deutsch"
etc.
\language suggests you may be dynamically changing the whole language
environment of
unction, I suggest you call it \notenames,
\notenames "italiano"
\notenames "deutsch"
etc.
\language suggests you may be dynamically changing the whole language
environment of Lilypond, including error messages, pointers to docs and
ds
...
}
or if you want it to apply to every score block in a file put it in
\header block?
Cheers,
Ian
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
codesite-nore...@google.com wrote:
Updates:
Status: Started
Comment #1 on issue 836 by v.villenave: Enhancement: output-suffix as a
(Score) context property
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=836
Ian is "trying to get [his] head around how to implement this pro
Erik Sandberg's thesis, so it's up to you how you mark this
tracker, as any more work on it will be tracked in 836.
Cheers,
Ian
Valentin Villenave wrote:
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 6:11 PM, Carl Sorensen wrote:
We only need a regtest once it's implemented. Â I think we don't have
ing output-suffix from Scheme
would be if the user insists on coding a group of \score blocks in
a file without using \book.
If you have any ideas for an architecturally cleaner solution which
would allow users to avoid dropping into Scheme I'm open to suggestions.
Cheers,
Ian Huli
erties which can be applied to \score blocks, like
autoAccidentals must use a different mechanism.
However, I'm having a hard time using git grep to discover what this is.
If anyone can shed some light on this, I'd be really grateful.
Cheers,
Ian Hulin
to use in the
development version but I'm on a steep learning curve so it may take a
while.
Cheers,
Ian Hulin
Manuel Bernhardt wrote:
Dear Lilypond team,
there seems to be no possibility to influence the output of the MIDI files, is
there?
As I notate many percussion staves, I often
Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 23 August 2009 16:22:04 Ian Hulin wrote:
Here is the tail of the output from the quoted version, there are
loads more calls to ly_format and then it enters the routine and
hangs.
Ah, are you sure you
Hi Reinhold,
Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Ian,
On Sunday 23 August 2009 13:20:17 Ian Hulin wrote:
Hi Reinhold,
I've tried your patch for ly:format and "~S" here.
The latest one which also escapes "?
Yes.
It looks
Hi Reinhold,
I've tried your patch for ly:format and "~S" here.
Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Samstag, 22. August 2009 15:57:51 schrieb Ian Hulin:
Hi Patrick, Reinhold,
Patrick McCarty wrote:
On 2009-08-21, Ian Hulin wrote:
Patric
Hi Patrick, Reinhold,
Patrick McCarty wrote:
On 2009-08-21, Ian Hulin wrote:
Patrick McCarty wrote:
Hmm...
I just realized why the ~S was being used instead of ~a: the ~S allows
double quotes in the filename, but ~a does not.
So this would fail with your patch:
$ lilypond \"file
with some extra code to defend against the case
you pointed out, changing the file\.pdf to file_.pdf.
Even if we don't do the last bit, we could go with Rheinhold's patch and
document the restriction. It certainly fixes the problem well enough
for my purposes in tracker 714.
Cheers
\alternatives applied to which repeat block?
Any comments from anyone who know anything about the way this stuff works?
Is it a Frog-type task to take on? I'm currently dual booting
Windows-XP and Ubuntu and also trying to get my head round Scheme.
Cheers,
Ian Hulin
Hans Aberg wrote:
On 1
at
>> affected only the documentation, rather than the program functionality.
>
Nevertheless, the docs bugs/feature requests still need to be tracked so Jon
the Newt would still need to learn the processes for this _and_ people in his
role are still the target audience for the Contribut
Hi Valentin,
Could I second this enhancement request? Then I can take my TODO
reminder comment out music-functions-init.ly.
Salut!
Ian
Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
Hi, Valentin,
Can we get an enhancement request for an automatically-generated language
reference that will include all parser
Risto Vääräniemi wrote:
Hi Ian,
2008/11/1 Ian Hulin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
The last kits for Windows I installed for 2.11.62
and 2.11.63 say they are
2.11.61 when
Do you have also 2.11.61 installed on your system but on a different
path? I have the same situation every time I install
source file.
Another side-effect of the bug is you can't use
\version "2.11.62" in source files.
Looks like it's a kit build hiccup.
Cheers,
Ian Hulin
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/
Windows XP Home Edition SP2.
Thank you.
Regards - Ian Grainger
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
I am unable to down load the examples. The link appears to point to an empty
directory.
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Cheers,
Ian Hulin
-Original Message-
From: John Mandereau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 23 August 2006 09:53
To: Ian Hulin
Cc: bug-lilypond@gnu.org
Subject: [Not a bug] Re: \tag does not accept list of symbols as documented
in help examples.
.
.
.
{snip}
.
.
.
That is not a bug: AFA
x27;...
Converting to `test.pdf'...
error: failed files: "test.ly"
Process lilypond exited with code 1
Lilypond help page section 8.2.8
The argument of the \tag command should be a symbol, or a list of symbols,
for example,
\tag #'(original-part transposed-part) ...
Graham Percival wrote:
>
> On 8-Aug-05, at 8:38 AM, Ian Chard wrote:
>
>> I'm using lilypond 2.7.4, and my (first!) input file doesn't seem to
>> generate valid MIDI output. I'm more than happy to admit it's my fault,
>> but I can't see wha
Pond 2.7.4
Processing `jump.ly'
Parsing...
Interpreting music...
with no output at all. If I have both \midi and \layout, a 294 byte
MIDI file is written that isn't playable.
I've included the full input file below (I couldn't figure out which bit
makes it break). Any h
t;< c4 \\ { 8[ ] } >> 4 } }
..no beam appears if I take out the explicit [ and ]. Is this a bug?
(using lilypond 2.0.1 on debian gnu/linux)
Ian
___
Bug-lilypond mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Hi,
Using lilypond 1.9.6 on the attached music, no lyrics appear after the
first tied note in each voice. Replacing the tie with a slur, e.g.
d~d => d( d)
makes the lyrics work fine.. until the next tie.
Am I doing something wrong here or is this a bug?
Ian
let_us_adore.ly
Descript
70 matches
Mail list logo
