what's going on here?
\version "2.19.8"
\relative {
\override Slur.height-limit = 1.26
\override PhrasingSlur.height-limit = 1.26
\magnifyMusic 0.63 { g'16( a b c) g\( a b c\) }
}
I've added this to the tracker:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3941
__
Federico Bruni wrote:
> Hi
>
> I'm translating NR 1.6 and I've found a sentence which is
> not straightforward:
> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.17/Documentation/notation/modifying-single-staves
>
> """
> However, it is possible to set ledger line thickness
> independently of staff lines. The two value
So, how exactly do I get all the New Century Schoolbook
fonts in one go? I could download all the typefaces
separately, but I won't know when I've gotten them all.
I did
sudo apt-get build-dep lilypond
and it claimed to install something, but I don't recall
what. Then I rebooted and checked
David Kastrup wrote:
>> make all &> make.log
>>
>> Am I using the wrong redirection operator?
>
> Depends on your shell. Bash understands both &> and >&.
Well, I'm using bash. This just gets weirder and weirder.
Here's my make.log:
http://www.markpolesky.com/norobots/make.log
___
Werner Lemberg wrote:
> Can you show us the lines in your `make.log' file directly
> after the calls to the `pfx2ttf.fontforge' script? Maybe
> there is some hint which shows what's going on.
Curiously, no. There is no call to that function in my
make.log file. I did:
make all &> make.log
Am
Werner Lemberg wrote:
> Note that there seems to be a bug somewhere regarding
> dependencies: Doing a non-parallel build, the above
> command is run four times. Maybe this is the very reasons
> of your problem.
Werner,
are you implying that you might know how to fix this? Or
should I instead as
Phil Holmes wrote:
> I'm fairly certain the -j/CPU_COUNT is irrelevant. Use an
> appropriate value for your machine. I asked earlier what
> happens if you try a simple compilation of some music with
> lyrics on your built LilyPond. Could you try, please?
Actually I hadn't run `make install' pre
Mark Polesky wrote:
> checking New Century Schoolbook PFB files... dirname:
> missing operand Try `dirname --help' for more information.
>
> I don't know what that means, but it doesn't raise an
> error. I'm going ahead with a full make/make doc, which
> t
Colin Campbell wrote:
> Another possibility is that your font cache is munged
Okay, I moved the .lilypond-fonts.cache-2/ directory out of
my home directory, and configure responds with:
checking New Century Schoolbook PFB files... dirname: missing operand
Try `dirname --help' for more informatio
In case anyone is still interested in this, today I
completely cleaned out my source dir and did a `make' and
`make doc' (no `-j5' or `CPU_COUNT=5'), from scratch with
latest master:
rm -rf ~/lilypond-git/* && git reset --hard origin/master
./autogen.sh --noconfigure
mkdir build/
cd build/
../conf
Colin Campbell wrote:
> When I compile, I generally use -j3 CPU_COUNT=3 on a
> dual-core machine, with no font issues that I've seen.
I have a quad-core; so I've been using -j5 CPU_COUNT=5.
- Mark
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http
David Kastrup wrote:
>> As I mentioned earlier, my font problem only happens on
>> 2.17.25. The output on 2.17.24 is fine.
>
> There is no real candidate for such a difference in the
> commits. So did you choose a significantly different
> directory name for building 2.17.25?
No. I haven't bui
Colin Campbell wrote:
> To be accurate, I tested on 2.17.24 so I'm just now
> remaking doc after updating to latest master and
> recompiling the binaries.
As I mentioned earlier, my font problem only happens on
2.17.25. The output on 2.17.24 is fine.
- Mark
___
Phil Holmes wrote:
> OK. You're definitely attaching cropped screenshots,
> AFAICS.
Yes.
> Compare the first one you attached, where the heading
> "Using \lyriscto" is sans serif, with the one you've just
> attached. That's a serif font.
Exactly. In the first one, I set my browser's default
Colin Campbell wrote:
> Looks as though the problem is local, Mark.
I'm willing to accept that as a possibility, but how would I
begin to troubleshoot it? How could I sort out the cause?
Besides, if that's true, what if this happens to other users
(and ones less advanced than I), what do we te
Phil Holmes wrote:
> Huh? The rest of the fonts on what looks like your
> screenshot from a browser are also sans-serif. Huh? It's
> looks like a problem with your system. As I said, I can't
> reproduce it on my system from git master.
Okay, Phil, sorry if I got snippy. But there's a
misund
forgot the attachment<>___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Phil Holmes wrote:
> I think this must be something to do with your own system
> - don't forget that for HTML, the font is actually chosen
> by the browser. Here's latest master, make doc on 64 bit
> Ubuntu 10.04.
Huh? The font problem is showing in the png images produced
from `make doc', not
James wrote:
> Using 32 bit lilydev I don't get this problem. It all
> looks 'normal' from building from today's tree.
Okay good, that should help developers narrow down this bug.
Thomas Morley wrote:
> Compiling
>
> [...]
>
> with 2.17.24 (via installer) on
> Linux kasten 2.6.32-50-generic #1
Hi, maybe this has been discussed and I missed it, but I
compiled the docs today, and all the lyrics came out in
"sans". Is this a known issue?
$ uname -a
Linux localhost 3.2.0-36-generic #57-Ubuntu SMP Tue Jan 8
21:44:52 UTC 2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
- Mark
<>_
I added this issue:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3507
By the way, is adding a new issue to the tracker sufficient
for it to be looked at/accepted? Or do I need to announce
it on bug-lilypond?
Thanks.
- Mark
___
bug-lilypond mail
Hi all,
I'm temporarily on a windows machine, and a I'm trying to
get the syntax highlighting to work with vim. I followed
the instructions in the docs here:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.17/Documentation/usage/text-editor-support.html#vim-mode
When I opened an .ly file in vim, I got this error:
Grand-replace hasn't been run for 2013 yet.
Since 2007, it has been run once a year, typically in early
January:
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=lilypond.git&a=search&h=HEAD&st=commit&s=Run.*grand-replace&sr=1
Can this be set as a cron job to run on Jan 1 of every year?
- Mark
__
Federico Bruni wrote:
>>> So I would rewrite the second sentence as:
>>>
>>> Multiple repeats with one alternate ending
>>>
>>> Does it make sense what I'm writing?
>>
>> I believe, this isn't the right place for asking
>> questions. Would you like to formulate a bug report?
>
> Well, it is a bug
Am I overlooking something simple? These don't do what I'd
expect:
$ lilypond -dshow-available-fonts | less
$ lilypond -dshow-available-fonts > fonts.txt
- Mark
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinf
David Kastrup wrote:
> Marek Klein writes:
>>> ly:grob-system only returns the system after is has been set in the
>>> PaperColumn which is after line breaking. What you see as #>> System > above is a single system encompassing the entire score.
>>
>> Sorry, I do not understand this langua
David Kastrup wrote:
> ly:grob-system only returns the system after is has been set in
> the PaperColumn which is after line breaking. What you see as
> # above is a single system encompassing the entire
> score.
Geez. That "scheme functions" page is the most abstruse
collection of unhelpful
Compiling this file displays "#" on the stdout:
{
\tweak before-line-breaking
#(lambda (grob)
(let* ((NoteColumn (ly:grob-parent grob X))
(PaperColumn (ly:grob-parent NoteColumn X))
(System (ly:grob-parent PaperColumn X)))
(display System)))
Sorry, I'm having trouble with my email client. My last
post got munged. Trying again, hope it works, bear with me...
Phil Holmes wrote:
>> If robots.txt was getting updated properly, all of our
>> Google search bar problems would be solved. We could
>> then stop telling Google to restrict the s
inal Message -
> From: Phil Holmes
> To: bug-lilypond@gnu.org
> Cc:
> Sent: Sunday, June 30, 2013 7:49 AM
> Subject: Re: robots.txt in git and online are not the same
>
>& quot;Mark Polesky" wrote in message
> news:1372597112.8599.yahoomail...@web181401.m
is not clear on docs web pages
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3367
- Mark
- Original Message -
> From: Mark Polesky
> To: bug-lilypond
> Cc:
> Sent: Friday, June 28, 2013 11:37 AM
> Subject: robots.txt in git and online are not the same
>
For some reason, http://www.lilypond.org/robots.txt differs
from Documentation/web/server/robots.txt as found in git.
It looks as if it isn't being updated on the server? I
don't get it, but it's worth looking into, since this helps
remove outdated links when someone googles us from the
outside
Hi,
when I do a search for anything using the website search
box, I get this dialog box:
[JavaScript Application]
SkipScreen cmp: Error: Illegal operation on WrappedNative prototype object
$ uname -a
Linux localhost 3.2.0-36-generic #57-Ubuntu SMP Tue Jan 8
21:44:52 UTC 2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64
Hey everyone,
Some choices for Staff.midiInstrument do not generate output
in MIDI. I did *not* try all 128 instruments, but with a quick
sampling, I found four that don't work:
music box
viola
string ensemble 2
choir aahs
Here's a test file:
\version "2.15.12"
\score {
\new Staff {
%% none of
Phil Holmes wrote:
> Mark,
>
> Running exactly that code on my machine produces what
> appears good output on my system. Windows, 2.14.0, using
> UK defaults. It might be worth your posting the output
> you get and the system details you have.
using GNOME on 64-bit Ubuntu 9.10 (Karmic Koala)
Bo
Hey guys,
I found another head-scratcher bug... This is the sort of thing
you can only find by accident. The first measure contains two
identical halves; the slur in the first half is printed properly,
but the slur in the second half is printed too high above the
beam.
I honestly tried to make
Hey guys,
When simultaneous tempo changes disagree:
1) a message reports "junking" all but the first one found;
2) and the first one found is printed in the pdf;
3) but the *last* one found is used for the midi output.
This is inconsistent and should be fixed!
Here's a small file demonstrating
Colin Campbell wrote:
>> I'd like to see an issue covering this. Even if a fix
>> is a long time coming it is best to have the issue
>> recorded. I think I'd call this a defect rather than an
>> enhancement, though.
>
> This would seem to be issue #99, Trevor, and given it was
> reported in 2006,
Hey devs -
I just found a problem with an old doc-commit of mine
(0a8cfef, from May 7 2010). I implicitly endorsed using
barchecks in the lyrics input (see LM 2.3.1 "Setting simple
songs"). Unfortunately, when the measure following a
barcheck starts with a rest, a "barcheck failed" warning
resul
In the example below, \caps and \smallCaps work with simple text
strings, but not with text fields accessed with \fromproperty.
For some reason, this is not a problem with \sans, \italic, and
\bold; they all work with both text strings and \fromproperty
fields.
This is not the expected behavior.
The \ppp collides with the SpanBar in the example below.
\new StaffGroup \relative f' <<
\new Staff { R1 | f2\ppp r | }
\new Staff { R1 | f1 | }
>>
Strangely, it seems that none of my three notation manuals
specifically address this (Ross, Stone, Read). Of course, I
have seen cases in publis
Brian wrote:
> Hi, I have downloaded
> http://download.linuxaudio.org/lilypond/binaries/darwin-x86/lilypond-2.12.3-1.darwin-x86.tar.bz2
> and now I'm not sure what the next step is to get it
> installed and running. Can you please help?
Instructions for MacOS X are here:
http://lilypond.org/macos
@multitable spacing too much in html
The space between two consecutive rows could comfortably fit
two more rows, and this is annoying to read in html.
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2009-10/msg00211.html
- Mark
___
bug-lilyp
Neil Puttock wrote:
> The reason why it's incompatible is that
> ly:script-interface::calc-direction relies on 'direction-source
> and 'side-relative-direction, neither of which is set for
> TextScript.
So what should we do about the duplicated 'direction entry?
- Mark
_
Phil Holmes wrote:
> In the PDF for internals, page 360, the description for
> "direction (direction)" is repeated. See also
> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentation/internals/textscript
See the post regarding this here:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2009-07/msg6.html
had...@ircam.fr wrote:
> After a break, the ties of tiecolumn are not repeated.
> (The override is necessary in my score because of a second
> voice not included. And if commented the ties work.)
This looks like either issue #840 or #1219:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=840
ht
Nick Payne wrote:
> Lilypond barfs on this:
>
> \paper {
> annotate-spacing = ##t
> system-system-spacing #'space = #3
> }
Thanks. This has already been reported:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1338
- Mark
___
bug-lilyp
\version "2.13.36"
\paper {
annotate-spacing = ##t
% this style works only if annotate-spacing is off:
top-system-spacing #'minimum-distance = #20
% this style works whether annotate-spacing is on
% or off, but is not a valid workaround since it
% unsets any alist keys that were prev
In NR 1.2.3 "Displaying rhythms - Time signature", the
\revertTimeSignatureSettings example (the last one before
the snippets) doesn't do what I'd expect from the text:
http://kainhofer.com/~lilypond/Documentation/notation/displaying-rhythms.html#time-signature
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?
Carl Sorensen wrote:
> I think that autobeaming in cadenzas should beam according
> to baseMoment, i.e. all beats should be grouped together
> in baseMoment units.
The very concept of beats within a cadenza goes against the
whole idea of a cadenza in the first place. I think a
better system would
Alexander Kobel wrote:
> @ Mark: Is it only that the docs are plain wrong, or do
> you really need the baseline-alignment for some reason?
Well, if I wanted to measure the distance between the United
States and Portugal, I wouldn't start from Los Angeles. (:
- Mark
Mark Polesky wrote:
> NR 4.1.2 "Page formatting - Vertical dimensions" says...
>
> after-title-spacing:
> space – the amount of stretchable space between the
> baseline of a title and the center of the staff that
> follows it;
>
> But compiling a test f
NR 4.1.2 "Page formatting - Vertical dimensions" says...
after-title-spacing:
space – the amount of stretchable space between the
baseline of a title and the center of the staff that
follows it;
But compiling a test file with annotate-spacing suggests
that the "space" is measured from the *
Trevor Daniels wrote:
> But a quick look through some of my music shows dynamics
> are more commonly placed above the staff, so I wonder why
> placing them below is the default? But I don't have any
> instrumental parts to hand - where are the dynamics in
> these usually placed?
Vocal dynamics ar
Oh no, not one of these threads...
Trevor Daniels wrote:
> We have to be careful to interpret this correctly. None
> of these writers were familiar with the use of "voice" in
> the computer engraving sense. By "voice" these writers
> mean parts that are on one staff but are to be played or
> sun
-Eluze wrote:
> i'm not sure i would like the dynamics of one voice above
> the staff in a polyphonic guitar piece - but you can use
> \dynamicUp to do so!
The authorities are unanimous on this point.
Kurt Stone, ch.1, "Placement of Dynamics...", p.31:
"A. Dynamics
1. INSTRUMENTAL MUSIC (
voiceOne Dynamics end up in the worst possible place...
- Mark
* * * * * * * * * *
\version "2.13.34"
\relative c'' {
<<
% "f" should go above the staff; but appears
% below the staff, below the "p" (!)
{ c2\f c }
\\
{ a2\p a }
>>
}
Brian wrote:
> Hi I have just downloaded lilypond on my intel mac and
> need to know how to set it up and get it running(:-( It
> seem a bit complicated for me is the a step by step
> documentation that I can follow to get it up and running?
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.12/Documentation/user/lilypon
Is this a bug?
- Mark
* * * * * * * * * *
% SpanBar disappears with \stopStaff\startStaff at linebreak
\version "2.13.31"
\score {
\new PianoStaff <<
\new Staff { b'1 b' \stopStaff \startStaff b' b' }
\new Staff { b'1 b' b' b' }
>>
\layout {
system-count = #2
line-width =
Dmytro O. Redchuk wrote:
> I am very sorry, i can not find original post; anyway.
>
> Original poster, please, provide a minimal example.
>
> I've tried[1] those lines by Mark[2] with "no success" --
> i could not reproduce error message mentioned.
>
> I am sorry, very probably this is my fault. Pl
james kelly wrote:
> How do you enter repeat signs 1st and 2nd etc endings
> coda as in a jazz chart
This is the bug list. You probably want the user list:
lilypond-u...@gnu.org
Anyway, did you look in the manual? Repeats are discussed
here:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.12/Documentation/user/lil
Is this a bug? Turning on the uniform-stretching property
has unexpected consequences. Except in the first measure of
a system, extra horizontal space is added before the first
beat of a measure if:
1) the measure has only one voice, containing one whole note
2) the measure starts with an accide
Trevor Skeggs wrote:
> Is it OK to post suggestions on this site? (I could not
> find any link for such in the Lilypond site, other than
> for documentation changes).
Questions like these are better suited for the developer
mailing list:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentation/web/contact
An
Neil Puttock wrote:
> Because we already have too many obsolete barline styles
> defined in bar-line.cc.
>
> When I added \bar ":|.:", it was suggested a better
> solution for the more esoteric types would be to have a
> scheme interface to allow users to add custom barlines
> easily.
Neil, I rem
Neil Puttock wrote:
>> One workaround is to have the user manually add:
>> \set countPercentRepeats = ##f
>
> Yes, but then so does
> \set fooBar = #'baz
> which shows there's an implicit voice problem here.
Neil, sometimes your lateral thinking is just too much for
me! I'd be curious to unde
(this is a copy of an unanswered post on lilypond-devel:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2010-03/msg00089.html)
While answering a question on -user, I found what looks like
an easily-solvable (?) limitation with /partcombine. The
part-combiner.scm file is a little beyond me, but
The first of a group of "full measure" percent repeat
symbols doesn't get printed when the music expression is
polyphonic (see the attached png); and the following errors
are generated:
programming error: must have Item for spanner bound of PercentRepeat
programming error: Multi_measure_rest::get_
Marc Hohl wrote:
> Yes, I knew that, but I found other sources with one more
> squiggle, which looked more pleasant to me - but that's my
> personal opinion.
Why not have the option for both? You could set up
something like:
\override Score.BarLine #'segno-style = #'default
\override Score.BarLi
> Marc had proposed a patch, that doesn't seem to have been
> applied.
>
> http://codereview.appspot.com/181144
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2010-01/msg00162.html
>
> Can anyone have a look?
I can't comment on the C++ code, and I haven't studied the
output-lib.scm stuff, b
Here's a patch. Okay to push?
- Mark
From 363fcb320d75d25385304411da22efe9eac23436 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mark Polesky
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 11:53:49 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Doc: NR: Organize `List of articulations' appendix.
---
Documentation/included/scrip
Neil Puttock wrote:
>> The example on the "changes" page is not displaying
>> properly.
>
> Where?
http://kainhofer.com/~lilypond/Documentation/changes/index.html
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/
Neil Puttock wrote:
> LGTM, pushed to master.
>
> I've just made one minor change: new features go at the
> top of changes.tely.
The example on the "changes" page is not displaying
properly.
- Mark
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@g
> Currently we show a warning if there's no \version
> statement. This is teh suck for the tutorial -- do we
> explain that people need to write
> \version "2.12.0"
> before they've even learned what
> { c'4 }
> means, or do we let their first view of lilypond be a
> warning?
Neither. Just l
rk
From d5f69c57e19af6085d071e581dbfa629c2e3a32a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mark Polesky
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 20:59:48 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] Doc: Add robots.txt item to Major release checklist.
---
Documentation/contributor/release-work.itexi |7 +++
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-
Graham Percival wrote:
> True, although it would be simple to have
> doc/stable/
> doc/devel/
> doc/archive/
That's better.
> Oh, we'll keep the stable docs. I just don't think the
> old *unstable* docs are worth having online.
Is it really such a burden to keep the old docs on the
lilypond.org
Graham Percival wrote:
> Huh, I didn't reliaze we kept the old unstable directories
> around; they're not listed on
> http://lilypond.org/documentation
> anybody mind if I delete the unstable doc dirs?
I might mind, but I don't think I'd be able to give any good
reason why. I think it's kinda n
This should be trivial to fix. I would do it but I can't
figure out from the sources how `robots.txt' is generated.
IIUC (correct me if I'm wrong), only the following rules
need to be followed:
1) The only valid locations for blank lines are *above* a
"User-agent" line and below the last "Disa
> Subject: Issue 379 in lilypond: ugly slur with key signature and linebreak
>
> Updates:
> Status: Started
Exciting!
- Mark
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
> I don't think I've ever seen a slur partly blanked out in a score.
> But the example in #409 is a tie.
>
>
>
> I've seen pieces since the 90s (Peters Edition and others) that use
> thepartly blanked out tie, but only to avoid a time signatures.
Ligeti piano etude #
#409 has had a workaround for a while now - LSR #613
http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=613
I guess I never noticed that it had already been in the tracker
for almost 2 years when new requests started coming in a couple
months ago. Could someone add a comment linking to the snippet?
Also, is th
Graham Percival wrote:
> But not until later, pending one of the long discussions
> I'm waiting to introduce on -devel.
Oh, *great*...
;)
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
Dénes Harmath wrote:
> Mark Polesky wrote:
> > This suggests that the command is derived from "hideNotes":
> > "un" + "hideNotes" = "unHideNotes"
>
> That logic isn't applied in the case of \set and \unset. That's
> why
Dénes Harmath wrote:
> The current syntax is misleading: the expression "un hide"
> doesn't exist but only "unhide". The capitalization should
> reflect this correctly.
Since there is already a command called "hideNotes", I think the
current capitalization reflects that properly.
This suggests t
howard bryant wrote:
> I cannot find any way to represent the following within a single 3/4
> bar. Imagine 4 voices (written one above the other here :
>
> r2 g8 f8 =3 beats
> D2 d4= 3 beats
> A2. = 3 beats
> D2. = 3 beats
>
> Make sense. The combination of chords and voicing does no
Bertalan Fodor wrote:
> in the documentation string of instrumentSwitch in music-functions-init.ly
>
> (_i "Switch instrument to @var{name}, which must be predefined with
> @var{\addInstrumentDefinition}.")
>
> The \ must be escaped: @var{\\addInstrumentDefinition}
>
> (This breaks LilyPondTo
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
> However, I just looked in a book on music typesetting ("Noter", by B. Tyboni,
> which unfortunately only is available in Swedish), which says that it is most
> common to do what you propose, namely to use the same measure numbers both in
> the first and second ending. S
sorry if this is already known.
- Mark
\remove broken in 2.13.1
\new Staff \with {
%% these get removed
\remove "Bar_engraver"
\remove "Clef_engraver"
\remove "Key_engraver"
\remove "Time_signature_engraver"
%% these don't
\remove "Beam_engraver"
\remo
Colin Case wrote:
> Basic Runtime Error - Variable not defined
> This is the code fragment - the variable is CursorPosition near the end.
> Happens in Writer and Draw exactly the same.
>
> ' If row is 0 or negative put curser to the start
> If iRow < 1 Then
> CurserPosition=1
>
- Forwarded Message
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 9:06 PM, Neil Puttockwrote:
>
> >> But neither of these do anything either:
> >> { \override Dots #'dot-count = #0 c''4. }
> >> { \override Dots #'dot-count = #3 c''4. }
> >
> > That's because the Dots_engraver ove
ch wrote:
> hi i need lily pond
Click on the appropriate install link here:
http://lilypond.org/web/install/
If you are using Windows, don't expect to see a program window.
Read http://lilypond.org/web/help/ for more.
(here's an excerpt)
LilyPond is a text-based tool. It does not have a graphic
line 408 of define-grobs.scm lists "staff" in a break-align-orders
vector. Is that a typo?
line 49 of lsr/creating-simultaneous-rehearsal-marks.ly reads:
\once \override Score.RehearsalMark #'break-align-symbols = #'(bar-line)
Is "bar-line" a valid choice?
The source leads me to believe that th
- Mark
0004-Typo-var-code.patch
Description: Binary data
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
line 270 of ly/music-functions-init.ly has this:
@var{\addInstrumentDefinition}
which gets mangled on the way to my browser:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.12/Documentation/user/lilypond/Overview-of-available-music-functions#index-instrumentSwitch-2
should @var be changed to @code? Or should the ba
Pekka Siponen wrote:
> Here is some more bad typography from major publishers.
> All of them have it.
Have what?
Werner was referring to the small white triangles
when he said "bad typography". Of the five examples
you've submitted, only the Grieg and the Pierné
have that problem.
If different
Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> defects, for example the second and last beam, both presenting those
> small white triangles which should *never* be present in former times
> since they can be flooded with ink as soon as the printing plate gets
> used a bit.
And this is exactly the problem with the defa
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> The rules in Ross' books are guidelines, and they certainly don't
> cover all the cases.
Yes, but what about the too-short stem on the
middle-line note:
> Your assertion that the 4th beat stem is too short
> is supported by Ted Ross, who says on p.85 that the
> downward
Mark Polesky wrote:
> Pekka Siponen wrote:
> > Also the stem lengths on the third and fourth
> > beat should be the same. The third beat stems
> > are a little too long and the fourth beat stem
> > is too short. Attached is the lilypond output.
>
> I will lo
Pekka Siponen wrote:
> 1. The beamed stems on the beat are too short,
> they should be the same length (an octave) as
> the 1/4 note on the second beat. Thus the c's
> would have the same stem length.
The stems and beams in the first beat look
exactly as they should according to p.105 of Ted
Ross
Here's an idea:
Figure out the path that runs along the outside of
a bezier sandwich. Find the max-thickness of that
path. Set that path as the clipping path. Draw a
dashed-slur (with thickness set to max-thickness)
that is clipped to within the sandwich's outside
path. I wonder if that might lo
It would be nice to have dashed slurs follow
exactly the same external bezier contours of
solid slurs (thicker in the middle, thinner
at the edges).
Though with what I already know of postscript,
I can't think of any easy way of implementing
this exactly (ie. with no right angles at dash
edges).
1 - 100 of 132 matches
Mail list logo
