Dénes Harmath wrote: > Mark Polesky wrote: > > This suggests that the command is derived from "hideNotes": > > "un" + "hideNotes" = "unHideNotes" > > That logic isn't applied in the case of \set and \unset. That's > why I am (and maybe also others are) always confused.
Oh, I hadn't thought of that. > > Sorry for nitpicking about syntax issues, but a consistent > convention is easier to remember. Absolutely no need to apologize for nitpicking about syntax issues, especially to me! (: I'm a stickler for consistency (among other things). But as you know, syntax changes are not made lightly. If enough developers agree that a change is preferable, then perhaps it will be made. \unset -> \unSet or \unHideNotes -> \unhideNotes If I had to pick one, I'd pick the second one, since it means less capitals (less holding down the <SHIFT> key). But I'm by no means in charge of these sorts of things. Anyone else care to comment? - Mark _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
