Placement of outside-staff objects: bug and behaviour change between 2.12.3 and 2.13.54

2011-03-19 Thread Frédéric Bron
Although outside-staff-priorities seem to not have changed between 2.12 and 2.13 (I compared roughtly define-grobs.scm), there is something strange: In the example below, the vertical placement of OttavaBracket, TextScript and MetronomeMark is not in the same order with 2.12.3 and 2.13.54 although

Re: Issue 1566 in lilypond: Flagged notes lose flags with autobeaming and hidenotes

2011-03-19 Thread lilypond
Comment #1 on issue 1566 by k-ohara5...@oco.net: Flagged notes lose flags with autobeaming and hidenotes http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1566 Autobeaming puts a beam across the {c8 c8. d16} \hideNotes hides that beam as part of hiding the c8 If you want a different beam to

Re: Release candidate 3 of 2.14 - LilyPond 2.13.54 released

2011-03-19 Thread Xavier Scheuer
2011/3/20 Frédéric Bron : > > Another strange thing: although outside-staff-priorities seem to not > have changed between 2.12 and 2.13 (I compared define-grobs.scm), > there is something strange: > I have an example where OttavaBracket, text markup and Tempo mark get > inverted although using the

Re: Issue 1555 in lilypond: Multiple warnings concerning staff-affinities

2011-03-19 Thread lilypond
Updates: Labels: -Patch-new Patch-needs_work Comment #18 on issue 1555 by colinpkc...@gmail.com: Multiple warnings concerning staff-affinities http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1555 Applying the patch gave an error, which I posted on reitveld. __

Re: Beaming rules may cause oddness when using hideNotes

2011-03-19 Thread Valentin Villenave
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Carl Sorensen wrote: > What would you like it to look like?  Can you manually beam it for us? Hi Carl, Well, ideally something like c''8.[ d''16] c''2, but even if unbeamed, I'd rather have a decent 16th note with a flag of sorts :) Thanks Phil and Xavier! Rega

Re: Possible bug on \addlyrics in Lilypond 2.13.54

2011-03-19 Thread Wim van Dommelen
The double lyrics words ar of course superfluous, sorry about that, but it doesn't change the problem Wim. ___ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond

Possible bug on \addlyrics in Lilypond 2.13.54

2011-03-19 Thread Wim van Dommelen
> I'm not top posting. I found some weird behaviour in music disappearing when adding a lyric. This is the smallest I could get the problem reduced to: \version "2.13.54" \score { \new Staff { \relative g' { g1 } % as soon as the next line is commented in the piece trunc

Re: lilypond v2.13.54

2011-03-19 Thread Trevor Daniels
MING TSANG wrote Saturday, March 19, 2011 12:42 PM when install v2.13.54, Panda Cloud Antivirus only indicates 1 virus deleted. when do a DIR on c:\program files\lilypond\usr\bin, there is no lilypond.exe found. The deleted file must be lilypond.exe. I cannot tell Panda Cloud Antivirus to r

\repeat percent does not use the beat-slash stencil

2011-03-19 Thread Ed Gordijn
> I'm not top posting. %%% Example about repeat percent %%% Beat-slash stencil should be used in both examples \version "2.13.54" \relative c''{ \time 4/4 \key c \major % Ok \repeat percent 4 {c8 c } % Not Ok \repeat percent 4 {c8 c16 c} } \layout{ ragged-right = #

Re: Beaming rules may cause oddness when using hideNotes

2011-03-19 Thread Phil Holmes
"Carl Sorensen" wrote in message news:c9a9155d.1bbab%c_soren...@byu.edu... On 3/18/11 12:50 PM, "Valentin Villenave" wrote: What would you like it to look like? Can you manually beam it for us? Thanks, Carl See my bug report. He'd probably like flags or beams on the quavers and sem

Re: Beaming rules may cause oddness when using hideNotes

2011-03-19 Thread Carl Sorensen
On 3/18/11 12:50 PM, "Valentin Villenave" wrote: > Greetings everybody, > > I've just stumbled upon the following piece of code, and it took me a > while to understand what was going wrong (although, granted, I should > know better). > > \new Staff << > \new Voice { \voiceOne > \set tieWa

Re: Issue 1349 in lilypond: Guile 2.0 compat: Scheme macros must be defined/autocompiled before they are used.

2011-03-19 Thread lilypond
Comment #9 on issue 1349 by pnorcks: Guile 2.0 compat: Scheme macros must be defined/autocompiled before they are used. http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1349 Thanks, Jan. I don't see segfaults anymore with the snapshot from that commit. With regard to merging the reorde

Issue 1566 in lilypond: Flagged notes lose flags with autobeaming and hidenotes

2011-03-19 Thread lilypond
Status: Accepted Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-High New issue 1566 by philehol...@googlemail.com: Flagged notes lose flags with autobeaming and hidenotes http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1566 Reported by Valentin. In the attached snippet, the c''8. d''16 notes in

Re: Beaming rules may cause oddness when using hideNotes

2011-03-19 Thread Phil Holmes
- Original Message - From: "Xavier Scheuer" To: "Phil Holmes" Cc: Sent: Saturday, March 19, 2011 12:32 PM Subject: Re: Beaming rules may cause oddness when using hideNotes On 19 March 2011 12:57, Phil Holmes wrote: To my somewhat untutored eye, the output looks what I'd expect.

Re: Beaming rules may cause oddness when using hideNotes

2011-03-19 Thread Xavier Scheuer
On 19 March 2011 12:57, Phil Holmes wrote: > > To my somewhat untutored eye, the output looks what I'd expect. How would > you expect it to appear? Yeah, it took me time to understand the expected output as well. Actually using \autoBeamOff in conjunction with \hideNotes (and \unHideNotes \

Re: Beaming rules may cause oddness when using hideNotes

2011-03-19 Thread Phil Holmes
"Valentin Villenave" wrote in message news:AANLkTikDLUg4isvP_sgCdXZv8p7uLzWgseCrS=mp0...@mail.gmail.com... Greetings everybody, I've just stumbled upon the following piece of code, and it took me a while to understand what was going wrong (although, granted, I should know better). \new Staff <

Re: lilypond v2.13.54

2011-03-19 Thread Trevor Daniels
On 18 Mar 2011, at 10:58, "MING TSANG" mailto:tsan...@rogers.com>> wrote: Here is the sequence steps: 1. uninstall v2.13.53 (uninstall program came with lilypond) 2. Do PATH on command prompt - lilypond still on the path 3. install v.13.54 4. Do PATH on command prompt 5. Do lilypond