----- Original Message ----- From: "Xavier Scheuer" <x.sche...@gmail.com>
To: "Phil Holmes" <m...@philholmes.net>
Cc: <bug-lilypond@gnu.org>
Sent: Saturday, March 19, 2011 12:32 PM
Subject: Re: Beaming rules may cause oddness when using hideNotes


On 19 March 2011 12:57, Phil Holmes <m...@philholmes.net> wrote:

To my somewhat untutored eye, the output looks what I'd expect. How would
you expect it to appear?

Yeah, it took me time to understand the expected output as well.

Actually using  \autoBeamOff  in conjunction with  \hideNotes
(and  \unHideNotes \autoBeamOn ) permit to have the good result.
Of course, one could also use manual beaming.

\new Staff <<
\new Voice { \voiceOne
  \set tieWaitForNote = ##t
  c''16~ b''~ <c'' b''>8~ b''2.
}
\new Voice { \voiceTwo
  s8
  \hideNotes \autoBeamOff
  c''~
  \unHideNotes \autoBeamOn
  c''8. d''16 c''2
}



Well spotted. That's bizarre it's actually losing the flags completely. I guess Lily is assuming that beams are going to be used, so doesn't engrave flags, but then it's not beamed.

http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1566

--
Phil Holmes



_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond

Reply via email to