In that case, I would propose to enter the chords as chords. In the
second measure,
what confuses LilyPond is that you have one stemless note (the whole
note) and
one with stem, that should "share" the same stem. Here's one way to
handle it,
namely to put the whole note in a separate voice. Read
Whoops forgot the reply all
Yes I know I provided the answers a while ago.
But at the moment the figures still show the same no matter what the
position they entered. Both the 3's in <3> <7 3> are on the bottom so they
shouldn't be swapped in the first place. Even if they are, swapping the
n
This problem/feature has been discussed several times on the mailing list,
check the archives.
/Mats
Trent Johnston wrote:
Hello everyone,
When using the figured bass above the staff with extender lines and
implicitBassFigures the the line always gets swapped around. In the
example below b
No, separate voices is not what I want. The notes are violin double
stops and the stems are supposed to go in the same direction.
David
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
Are you sure that you don't want to set these two lines
of music as separate voices? In other words, to use
...
<<
{
Hello everyone,
When using the figured bass above the staff with extender lines and
implicitBassFigures the the line always gets swapped around. In the example
below both lines should be positioned on the bottom. Switching the order of
numbers i.e. <3 7> instead of <7 3> makes no change.
Th
Joe Neeman wrote:
On Sat, 2006-10-14 at 01:46 -0400, Marcus Macauley wrote:
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> Marcus Macauley schreef:
>
>> So, Joe, whatever it is that you fixed, there still seems to be a
>> problem [with vertical spacing] in 2.9.22.
>> I can try to send an example if necessary.
>
>
Are you sure that you don't want to set these two lines
of music as separate voices? In other words, to use
...
<<
{
d4.( b8) a4 b
g1
}
\\
{
f4. d8 cis4\( c
\stemDown
b4.( a8 g2)\)
}
>>
If you look at th
If you haven't already, could you try 2.9.26?
Thanks,
Joe
On Mon, 2006-10-16 at 23:52 +1000, Trent Johnston wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've been struggling with page-layout with recent versions of Lilypond. But
> I think I've narrowed a bug when using #(define page-breaking
> optimal-page-breaks) - a
On Sat, 2006-10-14 at 01:46 -0400, Marcus Macauley wrote:
> Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
>
> > Marcus Macauley schreef:
> >
> >> So, Joe, whatever it is that you fixed, there still seems to be a
> >> problem [with vertical spacing] in 2.9.22.
> >> I can try to send an example if necessary.
> >
> > I
Hi,
with latest CVS and the old page breaker, "breakbefore = ##t" in \header
block has no effect.
NB: the same issue has been fixed for the new page breakers around
2.9.19 (see
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-lilypond/2006-09/msg00104.html ).
\version "2.9.26"
\paper {
page-breaking =
10 matches
Mail list logo
