Joe Neeman wrote:
On Sat, 2006-10-14 at 01:46 -0400, Marcus Macauley wrote:
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> Marcus Macauley schreef:
>
>> So, Joe, whatever it is that you fixed, there still seems to be a
>> problem [with vertical spacing] in 2.9.22.
>> I can try to send an example if necessary.
>
> I think this went in for 2.9.23
Actually, now in 2.9.23-1, it seems to be even worse than 2.9.22, though
in the other direction.
If you haven't already, could you try 2.9.26?
It looks like you fixed the problems of 2.9.23-1 with staves going off the
page -- thanks. As far as I can tell, it's back to the way it was in
2.9.22 (but still more spread out than it was in 2.9.17). This is the case
even when ragged-bottom and ragged-last-bottom are set to ##t, and, of
course, all manual \break and \noBreak commands are disabled.
For what it's worth, I can put \break and \noBreak commands where I want
them, and it doesn't prevent me from getting the layout I want. It's just
that, with this score at least, the default horizontal spacing /
linebreaking / pagebreaking isn't quite as good as it was in 2.9.17, in my
opinion. If the new spacing/breaking scheme produces better results
overall, I can live with that.
Thanks,
Marcus
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
