(Edited)
Forwarded Message
From: Svante Signell
To: debian-hurd maillist
Subject: Questions on isc-dhcp
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 21:33:42 +0100
Hi,
I'm trying to get isc-dhcp (4.1.1-P1-16) to build under GNU/Hurd but
have got into some problems with respect to configurations (in
Hi,
Here are my findings from a previous attempt at compiling dhcp.
2011/2/16 Svante Signell
>
> I'm trying to get isc-dhcp (4.1.1-P1-16) to build under GNU/Hurd but
> have got into some problems with respect to configurations (in addition
> to the PATH_MAX stuff, I intended to fix). Looks like
Diego Nieto Cid, le Wed 16 Feb 2011 14:33:15 -0300, a écrit :
> Not really. IMHO, get_hw_addr is an orthogonal feature poorly
> abstracted in isc-dhcp. To choose the implementation you have to use
> dirty hacks like the following:
>
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/htdig/dhcp-hackers/2009-March/001
Roland McGrath, le Tue 15 Feb 2011 19:10:34 -0800, a écrit :
> > I'd still be in favor or replacing "Set NODE's active translator" with
> > "Start NODE's active translator", to remind that it's merely a matter of
> > starting a process, and not writing down something in the FS.
>
> That seems reas
> "Start and set NODE's active translator"
That looks good.
> ? Also, for -p we might use
>
> "Record NODE's passive translator"
>
> to remind that it's merely recorded in the FS?
I again think that is more confusing rather than less.
Perhaps "Change NODE's passive translator record" if you
r
Roland McGrath, le Wed 16 Feb 2011 16:54:48 -0800, a écrit :
> > "Start and set NODE's active translator"
>
> That looks good.
>
> Perhaps "Change NODE's passive translator record" if you
> really want something different.
Ok, I've commited these.
Samuel
On Thu, 2011-02-17 at 01:04 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Diego Nieto Cid, le Wed 16 Feb 2011 14:33:15 -0300, a écrit :
> > Not really. IMHO, get_hw_addr is an orthogonal feature poorly
> > abstracted in isc-dhcp. To choose the implementation you have to use
> > dirty hacks like the following:
>
