Re: *** SPAM LEVEL 4.448 *** Dynamic linker behaviour difference between Linux, Hurd and FreeBSD

On 05/03/2013 12:11 PM, Paul Pluzhnikov wrote: > On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 8:11 AM, Simon Richter wrote: > >> I'm writing a small preload library to trace pthread_* calls ... >> In order to find the original function, I use dlsym(RTLD_NEXT, ...) ... > >> In any case, I am wondering if it is actuall

Re: *** SPAM LEVEL 4.448 *** Dynamic linker behaviour difference between Linux, Hurd and FreeBSD

On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 8:11 AM, Simon Richter wrote: > I'm writing a small preload library to trace pthread_* calls ... > In order to find the original function, I use dlsym(RTLD_NEXT, ...) ... > In any case, I am wondering if it is actually possible to redirect the > pthread_* functions in this

*** SPAM LEVEL 4.447 *** Re: Dynamic linker behaviour difference between Linux, Hurd and FreeBSD

Hi, On 03.05.2013 17:17, Carlos O'Donell wrote: > Can you produce a small self-contained test case that shows the > expected versus observed behaviour? Sure, attached. I'm not entirely confident about expected behaviour -- the behaviour observed on Hurd and BSD can be correct, and Linux the out

Re: *** SPAM LEVEL 4.448 *** Dynamic linker behaviour difference between Linux, Hurd and FreeBSD

On 05/03/2013 11:11 AM, Simon Richter wrote: > Hi, > > I'm writing a small preload library to trace pthread_* calls, and am > running into a bit of a chicken-and-egg problem. > > In order to find the original function, I use dlsym(RTLD_NEXT, ...) to > look up the symbol on the first invocation. O

*** SPAM LEVEL 4.448 *** Dynamic linker behaviour difference between Linux, Hurd and FreeBSD

Hi, I'm writing a small preload library to trace pthread_* calls, and am running into a bit of a chicken-and-egg problem. In order to find the original function, I use dlsym(RTLD_NEXT, ...) to look up the symbol on the first invocation. On Linux, this works find, however on the Hurd and on FreeBS

Re: ***SPAM*** Re: ***SPAM*** Re: trying to build gnumach.gz

> I guess Fedora does not leave its 32bit libc.a in /usr/lib, and thus > with -nostdlib it won't find it there. You need to pass LDFLAGS which > lead to it. It is, but it's in a separate package called glibc-static that you don't get just by installing glibc-devel.

Re: ***SPAM*** Re: ***SPAM*** Re: trying to build gnumach.gz

Andrew Engelbrecht, le Mon 01 Aug 2011 19:17:39 -0400, a écrit : > On Mon, 01 Aug 2011 18:26:16 -0400, Andrew Engelbrecht wrote: > >configfrag.ac ends like this: > > > ># `${file}' and `$file' have different meanings here with respect to > >having the > ># files in the referenced directory consider

Re: ***SPAM*** Re: trying to build gnumach.gz

On Mon, 01 Aug 2011 18:26:16 -0400, Andrew Engelbrecht wrote: configfrag.ac ends like this: # `${file}' and `$file' have different meanings here with respect to having the # files in the referenced directory considered for `make dist' or not. See #

Re: ***SPAM*** Re: trying to build gnumach.gz

On Tue, 2 Aug 2011 00:15:03 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: Well, the Debian package does it too, but gets config.status: linking ../i386/i386 to machine It's odd that you get this output while the code is AC_CONFIG_LINKS([machine:$systype/$systype mach/machine:$systype/include

Re: ***SPAM*** Re: trying to build gnumach.gz

Andrew Engelbrecht, le Mon 01 Aug 2011 18:07:13 -0400, a écrit : > On Mon, 1 Aug 2011 23:56:03 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > >It should have been done at the end of ./configure (see the > >configfrag.ac file): I'm getting > > > >config.status: linking i386/i386 to machine > >config.status: linkin

Re: spam filtering on the hurdextras lists

Thomas Schwinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | 23:59 tschwinge: I was going to make you project admin of hurdextras, > |but you obviously lack the stuff that takes to be a project > admin. > > How did you get to that conclusion? He's Alfred M. Szmidt, the GNU project release manage

Re: spam filtering on the hurdextras lists

On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 01:01:27AM +0100, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote: > If you wish to discuss private things, do it in private. http://web.walfield.org/~deride/%23%23hurd-20060109 says: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]:43> tschwinge is a complete and utter dickhead. Insulting people on a public IRC channel hardly

spam filtering on the hurdextras lists

, well--I'm flexible. | 00:03 Infact, what I _should_ do is bitch at you for taking matters into |your own hands without the consent of the maintainer of |hurdextras, i.e. Me (and Jim if he still does any of that stuff). Knowing your position about the spam-handling stuf

Re: spam filtering on the hurdextras lists

Thank you for once again confirming my decision, now I am sure I did the right thing in not making you a project administrator of HurdExtras. ___ Bug-hurd mailing list Bug-hurd@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd

Re: spam filtering on the hurdextras lists

If you wish to discuss private things, do it in private. This is my last mail on this topic, I have better things to do, like removing the lint between my toes. ___ Bug-hurd mailing list Bug-hurd@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: spam]

Hi Marcus > thanks for setting this up and clearing the queues. You deliver the > tins, we bring you the spam! ;) It always seems like everyone has so much spam they are always willing to share. :-) > Okie. I added a moderator. Who or what is the mail manager you added > in t

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: spam]

Hi Bob, thanks for setting this up and clearing the queues. You deliver the tins, we bring you the spam! ;) At Sun, 25 Sep 2005 12:04:01 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob Proulx) wrote: > Messages from non-subscribers who have never posted to the list before > will be held for human review.

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: spam]

Alfred M. Szmidt wrote: > Bob, could you setup the needed magic for the following lists: > > bug-hurd@gnu.org > help-hurd@gnu.org > web-hurd@gnu.org All done. I finished the configuration changes for the last two just a little bit ago. What this means to the mailing list: Messages from subscri

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: spam]

Alfred M. Szmidt wrote: > Bob, could you setup the needed magic for the following lists: Sure. I would be happy to set that up for you. > bug-hurd@gnu.org > help-hurd@gnu.org > web-hurd@gnu.org Oh my, there is a lot of spam in the hold queues there. I am actually on a short trip a

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: spam]

Great! Thanks a lot Bob. I might note that Thomas (Scwhinge) voluenteered in helping with filtering mail that needed human attention. ___ Bug-hurd mailing list Bug-hurd@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: spam]

red, but as you noted on IRC, some spam has gotten through. commit-hurd should ofcourse be setup in some manner so no spam get through, but I'm not sure how since I'm not familiar with mailman. ___ Bug-hurd mailing list Bug-hurd@gnu.org htt

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: spam]

On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 09:00:46PM +0200, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote: > What do people think about the following to reduce spam on bug-hurd > and help-hurd? Yes, that's definitively a sound approach that is working very well for other lists. Shouldn't commit-hurd, l4-hurd and

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: spam]

Hi, "Alfred M\. Szmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > What do people think about the following to reduce spam on bug-hurd > and help-hurd? It won't clean up the old archives, but it will clean > up future archives and might shut some people up that have been >

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: spam]

At Fri, 16 Sep 2005 21:00:46 +0200, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote: > > What do people think about the following to reduce spam on bug-hurd > and help-hurd? It won't clean up the old archives, but it will clean > up future archives and might shut some people up that have been > v

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: spam]

What do people think about the following to reduce spam on bug-hurd and help-hurd? It won't clean up the old archives, but it will clean up future archives and might shut some people up that have been voicing their opinion about spam to bug-hurd/help-hurd. --- Start of forwarded me

Re: Spam on bug-hurd.

still > post directly while being protected from receiving spam through the > list... Please read the mailing list archives for the numerous prior discussions about this issue. If you have something /genuinely new/ to add, do so afterwards. Thanks, Michael -- Michael Banck Debian Develo

Re: Spam on bug-hurd.

Could messages from non-subscribers be quarantined for a moderator to filter manually? That way, people wouldn't have to subscribe to send one message (though it would be delayed), yet subscribers could still post directly while being protected from receiving spam through the list...

Re: Spam on bug-hurd.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, What is with all the spam on this mailing list? Am I the only one getting it? Is this mailing list not subscriber post only...? Maybe it should be. All the spam sure makes it hard to decipher the real emails. Thanks. __ Donnie Spamassasin, properly configured

Re: Spam on bug-hurd.

On Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 09:53:42AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > What is with all the spam on this mailing list? > Am I the only one getting it? Please read the mailing list archives for the numerous prior discussions about this issue. If you have something /genuinely new/ to add,

Spam on bug-hurd.

Hello, What is with all the spam on this mailing list? Am I the only one getting it? Is this mailing list not subscriber post only...? Maybe it should be. All the spam sure makes it hard to decipher the real emails. Thanks. __ Donnie

spam and flame

Hi! Several lists which I subscribed is using spam filters. I just want to know why there isnt. Now I know(seems like). I dont think its a good idea. Dmitriy ___ Bug-hurd mailing list Bug-hurd@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd

Re: spam

hurg... I still think it is far easier for people to run their own spamfilters. And well, once in a while there are people who ask funny things that some might consider as spam (Hurd Windows anyone?). ___ Bug-hurd mailing list Bug-hurd@gnu.org http:

RE: spam

e with you...Always." Obi-Wan Kenobi "Use the Force, Luke."  Obi-Wan Kenobi > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bug-hurd- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marco Gerards > Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 6:20 PM > To: Chris Kerr > Cc: Bug-

RE: spam

ke."  Obi-Wan Kenobi > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bug-hurd- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alfred M. Szmidt > Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 1:24 PM > To: Gregg C Levine > Cc: Bug-hurd@gnu.org > Subject: Re: spam > >First stop

Re: spam

Ognyan Kulev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Dmitriy Tochansky wrote: >> Why are there so much spam?! > > Because anyone can post to GNU mailing lists without being > subscribed (to ease asking questions), and there are no spam > filters on the GNU servers. It's exp

Re: spam

Well, there are spam filters on GNU servers. Spam filters as in tagging/removing mail automaticly, ala spamassasin. Moderators don't count. (The GNU machines run spam filtering on non-list mails, but they don't run it at all on mailing lists to my knowledge, nor do I think it is p

Re: spam

Chris Kerr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > "there are no spam filters on GNU servers" > Is it possible to change this? Not by asking on this list, is my observation. Asking about it is only irritating for people who are subscribed. Could you contact the FSF system admi

Re: spam

Alfred M. Szmidt wrote: BTW Isn't this question for the FAQ? ;-) Great idea! And thanks for the answer to the question. ?? Why is there so much on bug-hurd/help-hurd? {OK} Because anyone can post to GNU mailing lists without being subscribed (to ease asking questions), and there are no

Re: spam

"there are no spam filters on GNU servers" Is it possible to change this? There are several problems with running spam filters (either only tagging, or deleting mail that might be spam) on mailing lists. But they are better discuess on a forum for that kind of stuff. If you are

Re: spam

"there are no spam filters on GNU servers" Is it possible to change this? --- Ognyan Kulev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dmitriy Tochansky wrote: > > Why are there so much spam?! > > Because anyone can post to GNU mailing lists without > being subscribed

Re: spam

BTW Isn't this question for the FAQ? ;-) Great idea! And thanks for the answer to the question. ?? Why is there so much on bug-hurd/help-hurd? {OK} Because anyone can post to GNU mailing lists without being subscribed (to ease asking questions), and there are no spam filters on th

Re: spam

Dmitriy Tochansky wrote: Why are there so much spam?! Because anyone can post to GNU mailing lists without being subscribed (to ease asking questions), and there are no spam filters on the GNU servers. It's expected that subscribers will do filtering on their side (Junk Control in Mo

Re: spam

First stop taking my mail out of context. I didn't take it out of context. Russia is a huge country, "that part of the world" means essentially anything from Europe, Asia, USA or the North Pole and probobly more places that just don't pop into my mind at this moment.

RE: spam

ine > Cc: Bug-hurd@gnu.org > Subject: Re: spam > >Starting about a year and a half earlier, something caused a large >volume of junk mail in one of the languages spoken in your part of >the world to land on us. > > Oh, you mean that place that is "the prot

Re: spam

uot;part of the world") Blech, more messages about spam then spam and patches/bug reports/ideas together. ___ Bug-hurd mailing list Bug-hurd@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd

RE: spam

n Kenobi "Use the Force, Luke."  Obi-Wan Kenobi > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bug-hurd- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dmitriy Tochansky > Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 6:06 AM > To:

spam

Why are there so much spam?! ___ Bug-hurd mailing list Bug-hurd@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd

hay algo mas que spam??/ have any more to spam???

solo eso / only this ___ Bug-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd

Re: Why SPAM through GNU HURD mailing lists?

Who should I contact if my mails are being marked as "X-spam: Yes"? No idea, maybe all subscribed users could be marked as "X-spam: no" by default, and then all non-subscribed users would be filtered through the spamfilter and marked based on that. In either case, you d

Re: Why SPAM through GNU HURD mailing lists?

If the mailing list software only marks mail then I doubt anyone will have a problem. That way people can filter out all mail that has a "X-spam: Yes" header if they want to. Who should I contact if my mails are being marked as "X-spam: Yes"? ___

Re: Why SPAM through GNU HURD mailing lists?

If the list would filter it, it would throw it away and the poster would wonder why it didn't arrive on the list. If the mailing list software only marks mail then I doubt anyone will have a problem. That way people can filter out all mail that has a "X-spam: Yes" header

Re: Why SPAM through GNU HURD mailing lists?

Santiago Vila wrote: On Sat, 16 Oct 2004, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote: Jeez, each time this topic comes up people start throwing out stupid ideas. Just run a spam filter will yah? Sorry, but your suggestion to use a spam filter *is* the stupid idea. If this may be fixed by simply "running a

Re: Why SPAM through GNU HURD mailing lists?

On Sat, 16 Oct 2004, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote: > Jeez, each time this topic comes up people start throwing out stupid > ideas. Just run a spam filter will yah? Sorry, but your suggestion to use a spam filter *is* the stupid idea. If this may be fixed by simply "running a spam filter

Re: Why SPAM through GNU HURD mailing lists?

Jeez, each time this topic comes up people start throwing out stupid ideas. Just run a spam filter will yah? Allowing non-subscribed people to post bug reports or help requests is useful. Being forced to subscribe to just ask a question, or to report a bug is moronic--I have been bitten by this

Re: Why SPAM through GNU HURD mailing lists?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Harley D. Eades III) writes: > some type of filter then it is possible real mail could get > lost. Which would open a door for a hole host of Hmm.. looks like anonymous posting is allowed. Only the posts of subscribed members should be let through on the list. Such an option is

Re: Why SPAM through GNU HURD mailing lists?

AIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hello GNU Developers, > > I have subscribed for bug-hurd,help-hurd, and web-hurd mailing > lists few days back. From that day onwards I am getting lots and lots > of SPAM mails to my account. Is somebody using gnu hurd mail servers > for spam?

Why SPAM through GNU HURD mailing lists?

Hello GNU Developers, I have subscribed for bug-hurd,help-hurd, and web-hurd mailing lists few days back. From that day onwards I am getting lots and lots of SPAM mails to my account. Is somebody using gnu hurd mail servers for spam? All these spam mails are containing bug-hurd or help-hurd

Re: [SPAM] braniff

>Joyce,! > >Need affordable but reliable web hosting for only $5/month? $5.95 is much more than $5. Not if it is 5 USD vs. 5.95 AUD (which is around 4.1 USD). ___ Bug-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinf

Re: [SPAM] braniff

Viola wrote: Joyce,! Need affordable but reliable web hosting for only $5/month? $5.95 is much more than $5. Paul Scott ___ Bug-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd

Re: (Cross post!) Spam on list in HTML and in Turkish

Has anyone on these lists seen that trash coming from some individual in Turkey? No, but I am getting a lot of trash from a Gregg C Levine. ___ Bug-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd

(Cross post!) Spam on list in HTML and in Turkish

Hello from Gregg C Levine Has anyone on these lists seen that trash coming from some individual in Turkey? He's attempting to promote his website, at the cost of its existence. It also happens that I am getting nowhere trying to follow normal channels to contact the clown at the site to complain, i

Spam on list in both HTML and a foreign language

Hello from Gregg C Levine (This is a cross post going to three lists, plus the postmaster himself at GNU.org) I just received two postings regarding apartments in Korea, and in Korean. That message was also sent in HTML form. It is annoying to receive such trash here, on my own. But even more so, w

Fw: [Newsletter] Spam from "newsletter@blackmusic.ch"??

- Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, November 02, 2002 2:43 AM Subject: [Newsletter] Spam from "mailto:newsletter@;blackmusic.ch?? > [sorry for any duplications] > > Based on the following link, this spam

Fw: [Newsletter] THIS IS SPAM

- Original Message - From: "Axel Fritz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Fred Ledo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, November 02, 2002 1:38 AM Subject: AW: [Newsletter] THIS IS SPAM right. me too. -Ursprünglich

Fw: [Newsletter] THIS IS SPAM

- Original Message - From: "Fred Ledo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, November 02, 2002 4:31 AM Subject: [Newsletter] THIS IS SPAM > > STOP SENDING ME MAILINGS > > > _

Fw: [Newsletter] Stop sending SPAM

- Original Message - From: "W. Alias" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, November 02, 2002 2:47 AM Subject: [Newsletter] Stop sending SPAM stop sending spam -- T-ISDN XXL: Der Festnetz-Anschluss mit dem Extra-Spaßfaktor! http://bonus.gmx.

[Newsletter] Spam from "newsletter@blackmusic.ch"??

[sorry for any duplications] Based on the following link, this spam appears to be coming from someone in Switzerland using a German Yahoo account. http://server4.hostpoint.ch/mailman/options/newsletter_blackmusic.ch/freebsd-hackers%40freebsd.org As a fellow victim, I highly recommend

[Newsletter] Stop sending SPAM

stop sending spam -- T-ISDN XXL: Der Festnetz-Anschluss mit dem Extra-Spaßfaktor! http://bonus.gmx.net/?gid=14477796&prid=335 ___ Newsletter mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://server4.hostpoint.ch/mailman/listinfo/newsletter_blackmusi

[fredledo@atomic.net: [Newsletter] THIS IS SPAM]

legit posts to this list in its short lifetime, the obvious purpose of this list is to transmit UCE and SPAM email. Please shut down this list immediately and erase all subscriber information, or at least unsubscribe everybody and ask for a confirmation mail, like it is done on any mailing list I am

[Newsletter] THIS IS SPAM

STOP SENDING ME MAILINGS ___ Newsletter mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://server4.hostpoint.ch/mailman/listinfo/newsletter_blackmusic.ch ___ Bug-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/m

AW: [Newsletter] THIS IS SPAM

right. me too. -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Newsletter-admin@;blackmusic.ch]Im Auftrag von Fred Ledo Gesendet: Samstag, 2. November 2002 04:31 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: [Newsletter] THIS IS SPAM STOP SENDING ME MAILINGS

Re: spam everywhere

On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 01:27:05PM +, Jose Eugenio Marchesi wrote: There should be RBL headers if you choose to ignore SPAM. GNU doesn't filter mailing lists at all per policy, but we attempt to tag spam so that the end use can filter as (s)he sees fit. > > uff, my anti-s

spam everywhere

uff, my anti-spam filters break out! there isnt implemented anti-spam filters into the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list server? jemarch. ___ Bug-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd

Re: spam: we should talk...

I've noticed there is more spam on bug-hurd and help-hurd than on any other list I am subscribed to. Maybe moderating any messages that don't have [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the To: or the CC: would solve most of the problem. I suppose they are working on propietary software. Anette Nord