[PATCH 00/12 gnumach] Progress on SMP with N cpus

This gets us closer to a working SMP kernel without breaking our non-SMP mode. What was tested? - kdb, apic, ncpus=8 with -smp 1 (boots slow) - kdb, apic, ncpus=8 with -smp 2 (hangs) - kdb, apic, ncpus=8 with -smp 4 (hangs) - kdb, apic, ncpus=8 with -smp 6 (hangs) - (no options) with -smp 1

Re: [PATCH 3/7] procfs: implement /proc/N/mounts

Justus Winter, le Mon 22 Sep 2014 11:38:40 +0200, a écrit : > * procfs/process.c (process_gc_mounts): New function. > (process_symlink_make_node): Likewise. > (entries): Use the new functions to provide a symlink to ../mounts. Mmm, I wouldn't lie like this: don't we have per-process views of what

Re: [PATCH 1/7] procfs: implement /proc/N/maps

Justus Winter, le Mon 22 Sep 2014 11:38:38 +0200, a écrit : > Fixes https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?32770 . Ack. > * procfs/process.c (process_file_gc_maps): New function. > (entries): Use the new function to implement /proc/N/maps. > --- > procfs/

[PATCH 1/7] procfs: implement /proc/N/maps

Fixes https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?32770 . * procfs/process.c (process_file_gc_maps): New function. (entries): Use the new function to implement /proc/N/maps. --- procfs/process.c | 104 ++- 1 file changed, 103 insertions(+), 1 deletion

[PATCH 3/7] procfs: implement /proc/N/mounts

* procfs/process.c (process_gc_mounts): New function. (process_symlink_make_node): Likewise. (entries): Use the new functions to provide a symlink to ../mounts. --- procfs/process.c | 27 +++ 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+) diff --git a/procfs/process.c b/procfs/process.c

[PATCH 1/6] procfs: implement /proc/N/mounts

* procfs/process.c (process_gc_mounts): New function. (process_symlink_make_node): Likewise. (entries): Use the new functions to provide a symlink to ../mounts. --- procfs/process.c | 27 +++ 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+) diff --git a/procfs/process.c b/procfs/process.c

[PATCH 1/2] procfs: implement /proc/N/maps

Fixes https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?32770 . * procfs/process.c (process_file_gc_maps): New function. (entries): Use the new function to implement /proc/N/maps. --- procfs/process.c | 104 ++- 1 file changed, 103 insertions(+), 1 deletion

Re: [PATCH] Normalize whitespace at the end of each file to '\n'

Justus Winter, le Sat 09 Nov 2013 11:58:04 +0100, a écrit : > Quoting Samuel Thibault (2013-11-08 23:38:33) > > Why not, it does not hurt. Except perhaps these, do we really need to > > put a blank line there? Having then really 0-long avoids allocating any > > data block at all, just metadata. >

Re: [PATCH] Normalize whitespace at the end of each file to '\n'

Quoting Samuel Thibault (2013-11-08 23:38:33) > Why not, it does not hurt. Except perhaps these, do we really need to > put a blank line there? Having then really 0-long avoids allocating any > data block at all, just metadata. > > > diff --git a/pfinet/glue-include/asm/segment.h > > b/pfinet/g

Re: [PATCH] Normalize whitespace at the end of each file to '\n'

Why not, it does not hurt. Except perhaps these, do we really need to put a blank line there? Having then really 0-long avoids allocating any data block at all, just metadata. > diff --git a/pfinet/glue-include/asm/segment.h > b/pfinet/glue-include/asm/segment.h > index e69de29..8b13789 100644

Re: [PATCH 1/4] mount: add -n and --no-mtab arguments

Applied pending patches, thanks! Samuel

Re: [PATCH 1/4] mount: add -n and --no-mtab arguments

Justus Winter, le Fri 28 Jun 2013 18:46:03 +0200, a écrit : > Add -n and --no-mtab arguments. As we do not write an mtab file, this > is a trivial patch that just ignores this argument to be more > compatible with Linux mount. I don't know whether we want to commit this upstr

[PATCH 1/4] mount: add -n and --no-mtab arguments

Add -n and --no-mtab arguments. As we do not write an mtab file, this is a trivial patch that just ignores this argument to be more compatible with Linux mount. * utils/mount.c (argp_opts): Add -n and --no-mtab. (parse_opt): Do nothing on 'n'. --- utils/mount.c |5 + 1 file

Re: exec server, /dev/fd/N, RPATH and $ORIGIN

On 09/06/11 09:46, Jeremie Koenig wrote: > On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 12:08:10PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >> These are a series of patches to fix https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?28934 >> (...) >> So this patch adds two new RPCs: exec_exec_file_name RPC and >> file_exec_file_name one. Then l

exec server, /dev/fd/N, RPATH and $ORIGIN

Hi, On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 12:08:10PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > These are a series of patches to fix https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?28934 > (...) > So this patch adds two new RPCs: exec_exec_file_name RPC and > file_exec_file_name one. Then libc can use exec_exec_file_name in > hurde

Re: [tschwinge+n...@gnu.org: Duke Nukem Forever Returns, Will Really Be Released in 2011]

Hello! On 4 September 2010 20:03, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > So, there's no escape anymore: we'll have to release next year, 2011. > Finally.  As far as I know, *everyone* is expecting Duke Nukem Forever > and the GNU Hurd to appear at the same time, yet to be bundeled (see >

Re: [tschwinge+n...@gnu.org: Duke Nukem Forever Returns, Will Really Be Released in 2011]

Hi, On Sat, Sep 04, 2010 at 04:33:22PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > So, there's no escape anymore: we'll have to release next year, 2011. > Finally. As far as I know, *everyone* is expecting Duke Nukem Forever > and the GNU Hurd to appear at the same time, yet to be bundeled (see >

[tschwinge+n...@gnu.org: Duke Nukem Forever Returns, Will Really Be Released in 2011]

Hello! So, there's no escape anymore: we'll have to release next year, 2011. Finally. As far as I know, *everyone* is expecting Duke Nukem Forever and the GNU Hurd to appear at the same time, yet to be bundeled (see ). | Date: Fri, 03 Sep 201

Re: exec server and /dev/fd/N

Hi, Regarding glibc checking for the presence of file_exec_file_name in configure, Thomas said he's happy if we just let the build fail if the RPC is not present. Should we check for it or is that fine? If it's fine, I believe these patches are ready to be pushed. If we need to check for it, I hav

Re: exec server and /dev/fd/N

Hi, On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 07:28:42PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > New iteration. All mentioned issues have been fixed, except for the glibc > check > for the file_exec_file_name RPC, which I don't know how to do if not using > HURD_INTERFACE_VERSION. Any suggestions are welcome. I ha

Re: exec server and /dev/fd/N

New iteration. All mentioned issues have been fixed, except for the glibc check for the file_exec_file_name RPC, which I don't know how to do if not using HURD_INTERFACE_VERSION. Any suggestions are welcome. I have left the HURD_INTERFACE_VERSION patch out. We should decide whether to remove it or

Re: exec server and /dev/fd/N

Hi, On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 06:27:29PM +0200, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote: > > Regarding version.h, I've bumped HURD_INTERFACE_VERSION in 0001 for > > exec_exec_file_name, but should it be bumped in 0002 too? > > This sounds good to me but if someone else objects you should change it. antrik recom

Re: exec server and /dev/fd/N

Hi, I have reviewed the patches and apart from formatting there were only a couple of issues. Next iteration is hopefully the last. On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 06:22:26PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 25/05/10 21:10, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote: > > It would also be good if you always incl

Re: exec server and /dev/fd/N

Hi, On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 12:29:06PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 26/05/10 09:32, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote: > > IIRC my major concern with this approach was that this way, the > > original task has to guess what file name will be valid in the new > > task's context... I don't

Re: exec server and /dev/fd/N

gt; > > task's context... I don't remember though what my conclusion was > > > regarding this being better or worse than doing the guessing in > > > exec :-( > But since exec still checks that the identity ports are the same and > falls back to using a "

Re: exec server and /dev/fd/N

Hi, On 25/05/10 21:10, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote: > Some of the changes that need to be made have already been discussed on > IRC: you should use string_t instead of data_t, empty string instead of > NULL for RPCs, and update copyright years, All fixed. > The first three patches are pretty usele

Re: exec server and /dev/fd/N

Hi, On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 09:10:57PM +0200, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote: > On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 12:08:10PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > > > > diff --git a/exec/hashexec.c b/exec/hashexec.c > > index 2aa3844..7a7b329 100644 > > --- a/exec/hashexec.c > > +++ b/exec/hashexec.c > > @@ -35

Re: exec server and /dev/fd/N

On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 09:42:05AM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote: > > I've commented on every hunk to make sure I looked through it all, > > which makes it a bit long but hopefully easy to follow (complain if it > > isn't). > > Well, it certainly does make it pretty redundant... I prioriti

Re: exec server and /dev/fd/N

can't find > >> the file name of the file being executed (when it's a script), and > >> then makes a hack passing /dev/fd/N to the interpreter. > >> > >> I tried to fix it with heuristics such as "if the file name contains > >> no slashes, the

Re: exec server and /dev/fd/N

Emilio Pozuelo Monfort, le Wed 26 May 2010 12:29:06 +0200, a écrit : > >> There's a little bootstrapping problem here: you can't apply the four > >> Hurd patches directly and build the whole Hurd, because lib*fs will be > >> using exec_exec_file_name, but the dynamic linker can't find it, since > >

Re: exec server and /dev/fd/N

t), and >> then makes a hack passing /dev/fd/N to the interpreter. >> >> I tried to fix it with heuristics such as "if the file name contains >> no slashes, then it's relative" and passing just a flag to the exec >> server to avoid needing to create new R

Re: exec server and /dev/fd/N

Hi, On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 09:10:57PM +0200, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote: > On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 12:08:10PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > The first three patches are pretty useless on their own, they all > affect the same program, and most changes are pretty mechanical, so I > think yo

Re: exec server and /dev/fd/N

Hi, On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 12:08:10PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > Basically the problem is that in some cases the exec server can't find > the file name of the file being executed (when it's a script), and > then makes a hack passing /dev/fd/N to the interpreter.

Re: exec server and /dev/fd/N

Hi, On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 01:39:24AM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 25/05/10 21:10, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote: > >> @@ -278,7 +280,9 @@ check_hashbang (struct execdata *e, > >> else > >>name = argv; > >> > >> -if (strchr (name, '/') != NULL) > >> +

Re: exec server and /dev/fd/N

Hi, On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 11:03:43PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > > The first three patches are pretty useless on their own, they all affect > > the same program, and most changes are pretty mechanical, so I think > > you might as well merge them. > > OK. I thought about going step by

Re: exec server and /dev/fd/N

On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 01:39:24AM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 25/05/10 21:10, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote: > >> @@ -278,7 +280,9 @@ check_hashbang (struct execdata *e, > >> else > >>name = argv; > >> > >> -if (strchr (name, '/') != NULL) > >> +if

Re: exec server and /dev/fd/N

On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 11:30:07PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Emilio Pozuelo Monfort, le Tue 25 May 2010 23:03:43 +0200, a écrit : > > > Oh, I haven't noticed this file before. :-) > > > > It's the list of symbols libc.so should export. Since _hurd_exec is a public > > API, I guessed _file_n

Re: exec server and /dev/fd/N

On 25/05/10 21:10, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote: >> @@ -278,7 +280,9 @@ check_hashbang (struct execdata *e, >>else >> name = argv; >> >> - if (strchr (name, '/') != NULL) >> + if (filename) >> +error = lookup (name = filename, 0, &name_file); >>

Re: exec server and /dev/fd/N

Emilio Pozuelo Monfort, le Tue 25 May 2010 23:03:43 +0200, a écrit : > > Oh, I haven't noticed this file before. :-) > > It's the list of symbols libc.so should export. Since _hurd_exec is a public > API, I guessed _file_name should be too. But if we don't want it to be > public, I > can probabl

Re: exec server and /dev/fd/N

Hi Carl, Thanks for the thorough review! On 25/05/10 21:10, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote: > Some of the changes that need to be made have already been discussed on > IRC: you should use string_t instead of data_t, empty string instead of > NULL for RPCs, and update copyright years, OK > The first

Re: exec server and /dev/fd/N

ted (when it's a script), and then makes a hack > passing /dev/fd/N to the interpreter. > > I tried to fix it with heuristics such as "if the file name contains no > slashes, > then it's relative" and passing just a flag to the exec server to avoid > needing &

exec server and /dev/fd/N

Hi, These are a series of patches to fix https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?28934 Basically the problem is that in some cases the exec server can't find the file name of the file being executed (when it's a script), and then makes a hack passing /dev/fd/N to the interpreter. I tried to f

[bug #19473] Running a fatfs translator on a node N can crash the file system server where N is on

Follow-up Comment #1, bug #19473 (project hurd): With this change I just applied the dynamically linked fatfs will work again. #v+ 2007-03-31 Thomas Schwinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Makefile (HURDLIBS): Put ``threads'' in front of ``ports''. #v- Nevertheless, the original report poste

[bug #19473] Running a fatfs translator on a node N can crash the file system server where N is on

URL: <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?19473> Summary: Running a fatfs translator on a node N can crash the file system server where N is on Project: The GNU Hurd Submitted by: tschwinge Submitted on: Friday 03/30/07 at

$B0lK|1_J,$N%W%l%<%s%H

$B!!!z8=:_!"%5%$%H#O#P#E#N%-%c%s%Z!<%sCf!z(B $BEPO?L5NA$N%5%$%H$GHV9fG'>[EMAIL PROTECTED](B $B$J$s$H(B10.000$B1_J,$b$NL5NA%]%$%s%H$r%W%l%<%s%H!*(B $B0lK|1_$b$N%]%$%s%H$r%W%l%<%s%H$7$F$bBg>fIW$J$N$O(B $B%5!<%S%9$,$7$C$+$j$7$F$$$F!"K~B-$7$F$*;YJ'[EM

$B0lK|1_J,$N%W%l%<%s%H

$B!!!z8=:_!"%5%$%H#O#P#E#N%-%c%s%Z!<%sCf!z(B $BEPO?L5NA$N%5%$%H$GHV9fG'>[EMAIL PROTECTED](B $B$J$s$H(B10.000$B1_J,$b$NL5NA%]%$%s%H$r%W%l%<%s%H!*(B $B0lK|1_$b$N%]%$%s%H$r%W%l%<%s%H$7$F$bBg>fIW$J$N$O(B $B%5!<%S%9$,$7$C$+$j$7$F$$$F!"K~B-$7$F$*;YJ'[EM

$B6[5^$N$*CN$i$;(B?

$B(#"c6[5^B.Js"d($(B $B!y40A4L5NA!y(B $B(&!=!=!=!=!=!=(%(B $B:#5U1g=u$,%"%D$$"M(B http://www.ecdrf.com/?kane $B$*6b$b$+$1$:$K$9$0$K(BH$B$J=w$N;R$H2q$([EMAIL PROTECTED],$h$M!)(B $BKhLk3Z$7$$;~4V2a$4$7$F$_$^$;$s$+!)(B $B"((BI don't

Felicitación de Housebanc

HOUSEBANC FELIZ NAVIDAD  El equipo de HOUSEBANC queremos daros las gracias por vuestro apoyo durante este año 2004 y desearos unas muy fe

¶’†o‚µ‚n‚j‘命”I—‚ꂽ‚¢ƒƒPƒAƒŠ—«ŒÀ’è–³—¿Ð‰îI

男性なら「もっと簡単にHがしたい！」「付き合うためにあまり費用を掛けたくない！」と思う方は多いのではないでしょうか？ 今回当グループにて細かいこと抜きでHをたくさんしたいというちょっとワケアリでHな女性だけを集めて貴方にご紹介します！ しかし、いざできるとなれば少しは選り好みをしたいのが男ゴコロ… 貴方のお住まいの地域をご記入して頂くだけで私共が素早く貴方の近くにいるHな女性達の情報を無料公開します♪ 例えば… ・彼氏を作れなくてずっと一人で慰めている欲求不満のOL ・生理前でムラムラしてる…でも夫とのセックスはマンネリでもっと刺激が欲しい人妻 ・仕事命だけどやっぱり孤独はイヤ…一夜限り

n

¶’†o‚µ‚n‚j‘命”I—‚ꂽ‚¢ƒƒPƒAƒŠ—«ŒÀ’è–³—¿Ð‰îI

男性なら「もっと簡単にHがしたい！」「付き合うためにあまり費用を掛けたくない！」と思う方は多いのではないでしょうか？ 今回当グループにて細かいこと抜きでHをたくさんしたいというちょっとワケアリでHな女性だけを集めて貴方にご紹介します！ しかし、いざできるとなれば少しは選り好みをしたいのが男ゴコロ… 貴方のお住まいの地域をご記入して頂くだけで私共が素早く貴方の近くにいるHな女性達の情報を無料公開します♪ 例えば… ・彼氏を作れなくてずっと一人で慰めている欲求不満のOL ・生理前でムラムラしてる…でも夫とのセックスはマンネリでもっと刺激が欲しい人妻 ・仕事命だけどやっぱり孤独はイヤ…一夜限り

Oportunidades de inversión Inmobiliaria

Title: Provisional Publicidad HOUSEBAN   ¡En hora buena!  Si ha comprado o vendido su vivienda con Houseban durante el año 2004. Ha ganado un viaje de luj

$B2F5(%-%c%s%Z!<%s$N$40FFb(B

$B$3$N%a!<%k$O2<5-;v6H<$BAw?. $BL>>N!'(BMAIL STORE $B=;=j!'El5~ET?7=I6h@>?7=I(B1-18-13-203 (B $BFCDj>&$7$J$$>l9g$NO"MmJ}K!(B $B4X78$N$J$$J}$KFO$-$^$7$?>l9g$*OM$S?=$7>e$2$^$9!#(B

$B%b%P%$%k%i%s%-%s%0%5%$%H?7@_$N$*CN$i(B$B$;!*!*!*(B

$B!A!A!A!A!A!A!A!A!A!A!A!A!A!A!A!A!A!A!A!A!A!A!A!A!A!A!A!A!A!A(B $B%5%$%H4IM}http://www.hotclick.tv/24781 (B $B$*$N%8%c%s%k$K$I$s$I$sEPO?$7$F$/[EMAIL PROTECTED](B $B$b$7=EJ#Aw?.Ey8f:B$$$^$7$?$i$*OM$S?=$7>e$2$^$9!#(B $B$^$?!"$3$N%i%s%-%s%0$X$NM6$$$rhttp://mail.gnu.org/mailman/list

$BL$>5Bz9-9p"(!!%M%C%H%S%8%M%9;Y1g$N$40FFb(B

<$B;v6H<$BAw?. (BYM$B%M%C%H(B $BBeI=(B:$B9>:j(B (B<$B$NJ}(B($B$=$N$^$^JV?.2<$5$$(B)> (B[EMAIL PROTECTED] (B $B!yWD!!%M%C%H%o!<%/%S%8%M%9I,<{IJ>pJs%Q%C%/!!WD!y(B (B $B$3$l$+$i%M%C%H%o!<%/%S%8%M%9$r3+6H$9$kJ}$d!"4{$KJmLs(B30$BK|L>(B($

Bug-hurd, J0|N N0\/\/ to see new 2004 foorblddeen lnccessst scenes

...Dad yanked off my little red silky panties and massaged my ppusssy rubbing my clit. Then without saying anything He rammed into me . He was so big I could feel him hit the back of my ppussy. He was so rough and hard with me that I began to moan and he had to put his hand over my mouth to muffle

Bug-hurd, J0|N N0\/\/ to see new 2004 foorblddeen lnccessst scenes

...Dad yanked off my little red silky panties and massaged my ppusssy rubbing my clit. Then without saying anything He rammed into me . He was so big I could feel him hit the back of my ppussy. He was so rough and hard with me that I began to moan and he had to put his hand over my mouth to muffle

$BL$>5Bz9-9p"(9-9p7G:\$N$*4j$$%/(B$B%C%7%g%s$J$7!o(B20$B!A(B

$B!z!y!z!y!z!y!z!y!z!y!z!y!z!y!z!y!z!y!z!y!z!y!z!y!z!y!z!y!z!y!z!y!z!y!z!y!z!y!z(B (B $BFMA3$N%a!<%k<:Ni$$$?$7$^$9!#(B $B;d!"%/%j%C%/%Q!<%H%J!<[EMAIL PROTECTED](B (B $B:#2s5.%5%$%H$rGR8+$5$;$FD:$$$FBgJQFbMF$b$h$/[EMAIL (BPROTECTED]@$H46$8$i$l$^$7$?$N$G(B $B@'Hs$H$

$BF|K\6%GO%U%!%sI,8+!*!*G[(B$BEv@$3&0l$N%V%C%/%a!<%+!<(B

$B!!F|K\6%GO%U%!%sI,8+!*!*(B [EMAIL PROTECTED]&0l$N%V%C%/%a!<%+!<(B (BWORLD BOOK MAKERS $B$N$40FFb$G$9!#(B (B $B!!(BWORLD BOOK MAKERS $B$O(B $B%l!<%97k2L!"%9%]!<%D%2!<%`$N(B $B7k2L$KER$1$k$3$H$,$G$-$k%V%C%/%a!<%+!<$G$9!#F|K\$G(B $B9T$o$l$F$$$khttp:/

$BL$>5Bz9-9p"(!V%+!<%I$N(B$BGc$$J*OH$G%-%c%C%7%e%2(B$B%C%H!W(B

$B#F#R#O#M!'([EMAIL PROTECTED] $B!cAw?.Kt$OL>>N(B:$B%(%`%1%$!&%$%s%?!<%J%7%g%J%k!!9-9pIt(B (B$B=;=j!'J!2,8)KL6e=#;T>.ARKL6hEDD.(B10-38 (B$BEEOCHV9f!'(B093-592-4496 $B!cG[?.Dd;_J}K!!d>e5-%"%I%l%9$K$=$N$^$

$BL$>5Bz9-9p"(!!Ey?HBg$N%@%s%7%s%0(B$B!&%5%s%?%/%m!<%9$r%$%s%?!<%M%C%H2A3J(B$B$G(B!!

<$B;v6H<$BAw?. $BM-8B2qhttp://boxy.fc2web.com/ $BK\&IJ$N$40FFb$,$4ITMW$NJ}$K$O$*OM$S?=$7>e$2$^$9$H$H$b$K!"(B $BJ@$5$l$J$$J}$O$=$N$^$^$4JV?.(B $B2<$5$$!#0J9_$NG[?.$O$$$?$7$^$;$s!#(B ----- $B:#G/$N%/%j%9%^%

ILIé“`ƒpƒbƒN’l‰º‚°I

Title: 5800‰~‚Å‚l‚c”­‘—‘ãsŠJ‹Æ é“`‚É‚àÅ‚‚ÈDMƒpƒbƒNI ‘啝’l‰º‚°I‚T‚W‚O‚O‰~‚Å‚²’ñ‹ŸI ¡Aé“`‚ōłàŒø‰Ê‚ª‚ ‚é‚Ì‚ÍDM‚Å‚·B ‚±‚ÌDMƒpƒbƒN‚Í‚Ù‚ñ‚Ì‚¿‚å‚Á‚Ƃ̃AƒCƒfƒA‚â“w—Í‚Å ’N‚Å‚àŒŽ‚É‚R‚O–œ `‚U‚O–œ‰~‚ÌŽû“ü‚𓾂鎖‚ÍŠÈ’P‚È‚ñ‚Å‚·B DM”­‘—‘ãsŠJ‹Æ‚É‚àƒpƒbƒ`ƒŠ‚Å‚µ‚傤B šˆÈ‰º‚ª¡‰ñŽ„‚Ì’ñ

ILIé“`ƒpƒbƒN’l‰º‚°I

Title: 5800‰~‚ÅDM”­‘—‘ãsŠJ‹Æ é“`‚É‚àÅ‚‚ÈDMƒpƒbƒNI ‘啝’l‰º‚°I‚T‚W‚O‚O‰~‚Å‚²’ñ‹ŸI ¡Aé“`‚ōłàŒø‰Ê‚ª‚ ‚é‚Ì‚ÍDM‚Å‚·B ‚±‚ÌDMƒpƒbƒN‚Í‚Ù‚ñ‚Ì‚¿‚å‚Á‚Ƃ̃AƒCƒfƒA‚â“w—Í‚Å ’N‚Å‚àŒŽ‚É‚R‚O–œ `‚U‚O–œ‰~‚ÌŽû“ü‚𓾂鎖‚ÍŠÈ’P‚È‚ñ‚Å‚·B DM”­‘—‘ãsŠJ‹Æ‚É‚àƒpƒbƒ`ƒŠ‚Å‚µ‚傤B šˆÈ‰º‚ª¡‰ñŽ„‚Ì’ñ‹Ÿ‚·‚é

OTC: SEPT..Great Growth Potential with Revolutionary New Product.. N

Informational Alert! This Week's Spotlight! September Group, Inc. (OTC: SEPT)