Exactly.
___
Bug-hurd mailing list
Bug-hurd@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 05:56:40PM +0200, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
>>00_autoconf_update.patch
>
>http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-hurd/2004-10/msg00298.html>
>Note that this patch also needs 'mv i386/linux/Drivers.in
>i386/linux/configure.ac'. (See debian/rules or the abov
[ CCed to the patch's author, Alexey Dejneka. ]
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 06:15:07PM +0200, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
>>10_cdromlock.patch
>
>http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-hurd/2000-11/msg6.html>
>
> Could you provide a ChangeLog for this one?
Here we go:
2005-04-05 Thoma
>00_autoconf_update.patch
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-hurd/2004-10/msg00298.html>
Note that this patch also needs 'mv i386/linux/Drivers.in
i386/linux/configure.ac'. (See debian/rules or the above URL.)
This patch needs to be checked so that a full bootstrap works with
>10_cdromlock.patch
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-hurd/2000-11/msg6.html>
Could you provide a ChangeLog for this one? Even if you didn't write
it, it would be nice (put your name at the top, and make a simple note
like "Patch by FOO BAR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>." at the end of t
On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 10:48:38PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> The pending (Debian) GNU Mach patches...
>
> >00_autoconf_update.patch
>
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-hurd/2004-10/msg00298.html>
> Note that this patch also needs 'mv i386/linux/Drivers.in
> i386/linux/configure.ac
The pending (Debian) GNU Mach patches...
>00_autoconf_update.patch
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-hurd/2004-10/msg00298.html>
Note that this patch also needs 'mv i386/linux/Drivers.in
i386/linux/configure.ac'. (See debian/rules or the above URL.)
>10_cdromlock.patch
http://list
> Won't be applied, Debian specific.
>
>ttys.patch
>
> I submitted something similar, forgot why it never got applied.
Marcus argued that this patch does not make sense as long as the
Hurd console is not started on bootup, IIRC.
I doubt that is how he argued, having tho
On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 07:27:22PM +0100, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
>patches-contrib/kbd.patch
>
> Won't be applied, hack.
It's in patches-contrib, which means it is not used currently. Indeed,
since the console repeaters have been introduced, this patch is obsolete
and will get dropped for th
patches-contrib/kbd.patch
Won't be applied, hack.
ext2fs_large_stores.patch
Should be applied, and if I ruled the world it would have been done so
already.
mouse.patch
Won't be applied. It is a hack.
no-debian-dir.patch
Won't be applied, Debian specific.
pfinet_dhcp.patch
I
On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 04:38:04PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 03:02:58PM +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> > Shall I prepare equivalent lists for the other packages?
>
> There will be an upload of the hurd package in due short which will
> shuffle around the patches quite
Could you send a list of patches that where introduced?
___
Bug-hurd mailing list
Bug-hurd@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 03:02:58PM +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> Shall I prepare equivalent lists for the other packages?
There will be an upload of the hurd package in due short which will
shuffle around the patches quite a bit (dropping the ones which got
applied, introducing new ones), so at
Shall I prepare equivalent lists for the other packages?
I'm atleast only interested in packages releated to the Hurd (GNU
Mach, MiG, the Hurd, maybe glibc if there are any outstanding Hurd
hacks in there that I don't know about). So it would be nice if you
could do this.
Thank you.
___
On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 07:07:48PM +0100, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
>*kick*, *kick*, *kick*.
>:-)
>
> The list you gave was more helpful then the kicks... =)
That's what I expected.
:->
>00_autoconf_update.patch
>10_cdromlock.patch
>11_nic_update.patch
>13_ide_dma.patch
>
*kick*, *kick*, *kick*.
:-)
The list you gave was more helpful then the kicks... =)
Already applied are 12_fixes_gcc-3.4.patch, 14_disable_fpe.patch,
15_disable_qlogic_firmware.patch, 16_enable_debug.patch,
17_fix_double_free.patch, 18_linux_printk_buffer_overrun.patch and
19_cp
16 matches
Mail list logo
