On Tue, 2012-01-24 at 15:33 +0100, Tanguy LE CARROUR wrote:
> Is this the right place to check for next time? (instead of asking
> stupid questions ^_^')
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=257087
You should check:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?users=debian-h...@lis
2012/1/24 Samuel Thibault
> Tanguy LE CARROUR, le Tue 24 Jan 2012 13:16:36 +0100, a écrit :
> > I checked version 0.3.22. Here is part of the debian/changelog
> >
> > auto-apt (0.3.22) unstable; urgency=low
> > [...]
> > * debian/patches
> > - (Number 10): Fix FTBFS(hurd-i386): PATH_MAX u
Tanguy LE CARROUR, le Tue 24 Jan 2012 13:16:36 +0100, a écrit :
> I checked version 0.3.22. Here is part of the debian/changelog
>
> auto-apt (0.3.22) unstable; urgency=low
> [...]
> * debian/patches
> - (Number 10): Fix FTBFS(hurd-i386): PATH_MAX undeclared
> (Closes: #257087).
>
2012/1/24 Samuel Thibault
> Tanguy LE CARROUR, le Tue 24 Jan 2012 11:07:24 +0100, a écrit :
> > 1) How comes the Hurd patch (part of the last debian/changelog entry)
> doesn't
> > fix this one, leaving a FTBFS package?!
>
> Most probably because this one is new.
>
Oh...
Maybe you can clarify some
Tanguy LE CARROUR, le Tue 24 Jan 2012 11:07:24 +0100, a écrit :
> 1) How comes the Hurd patch (part of the last debian/changelog entry) doesn't
> fix this one, leaving a FTBFS package?!
Most probably because this one is new.
> 2) When is is acceptable to solve a PATH_MAX problem like it was done
Hi guys!
Some more question on "Porting Package", but this time with a specific
example...
I picked "auto-apt" (0.3.22) and even if some Hurd patch had been applied
the code still failed to compile because of one undeclared PATH_MAX.
1) How comes the Hurd patch (part of the last debian/changelog
Hi!
2012/1/18 Anatoly A. Kazantsev
> Also, it's possible to use sshfs. It allows to edit files on VM directly
> with a preffered editor :-)
I'll stick to: try everything on Linux and when it works scp/ssh to
Hurd-qemu to try it!
For now I've selected a bunch of "useless" packages from the bott
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 22:22:28 +0100
Svante Signell wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-01-17 at 21:30 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Tanguy LE CARROUR, le Tue 17 Jan 2012 21:20:24 +0100, a écrit :
> > > Le mardi 17 janvier 2012, Svante Signell a
> > > écrit :
> > > > On Tue, 2012-01-17 at 17:03 +0100, Tang
Hi Tanguy :)
In-Reply-To:
Quoting Tanguy LE CARROUR (2012-01-18 10:19:14)
>For sure, once it builds on Linux I have to try it on Hurd.
>But the build process take longer in my qemu. And I'm used to use pbuild which
>is also a bit of an overhead.
>
>[...]
>
>I do the same but all network related
On Wed, 2012-01-18 at 10:29 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Samuel Thibault, le Wed 18 Jan 2012 10:27:10 +0100, a écrit :
> > Tanguy LE CARROUR, le Wed 18 Jan 2012 10:19:14 +0100, a écrit :
> > Also check the bug tracker and
> > http://wiki.debian.org/Debian_GNU/Hurd
> > for possibly existing pat
Samuel Thibault, le Wed 18 Jan 2012 10:27:10 +0100, a écrit :
> Tanguy LE CARROUR, le Wed 18 Jan 2012 10:19:14 +0100, a écrit :
> > Oh, one last question: According to the timestamp this list [1] seems up to
> > date, should it be the one to choose packages to fix from?
> >
> > [1] http://people.
Tanguy LE CARROUR, le Wed 18 Jan 2012 10:19:14 +0100, a écrit :
> Oh, one last question: According to the timestamp this list [1] seems up to
> date, should it be the one to choose packages to fix from?
>
> [1] http://people.debian.org/~sthibault/graph-total-top.txt
Yes. Note that the topmost pa
Hi!
2012/1/17 Samuel Thibault
> > But, as fixing problems such as PATH_MAX is not Hurd specific, one could
> also
>
> fix it on a Linux system.
>
> PATH_MAX issues can be worked on on Linux, yes. But a test is needed on
> Hurd afterwards, in case some other, non-PATH_MAX issues remain.
>
For sur
On Tue, 2012-01-17 at 21:30 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Tanguy LE CARROUR, le Tue 17 Jan 2012 21:20:24 +0100, a écrit :
> > Le mardi 17 janvier 2012, Svante Signell a écrit
> > :
> > > On Tue, 2012-01-17 at 17:03 +0100, Tanguy LE CARROUR wrote:
> > >> Can I fix Hurd package build errors (simp
Tanguy LE CARROUR, le Tue 17 Jan 2012 21:20:24 +0100, a écrit :
> Le mardi 17 janvier 2012, Svante Signell a écrit :
> > On Tue, 2012-01-17 at 17:03 +0100, Tanguy LE CARROUR wrote:
> >> Can I fix Hurd package build errors (simple ones like PATH_MAX) on a
> >> Linux system?
> > The best way to port
Hi,
Le mardi 17 janvier 2012, Svante Signell a
écrit :
> On Tue, 2012-01-17 at 17:03 +0100, Tanguy LE CARROUR wrote:
>> Can I fix Hurd package build errors (simple ones like PATH_MAX) on a
>> Linux system?
> The best way to port packages using Linux is to install a Hurd image in
> a VM, like kvm
On Tue, 2012-01-17 at 17:03 +0100, Tanguy LE CARROUR wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I have a small (stupid) question regarding "Porting Debian Packages".
> I already know the answer but I have to ask anyway before I start
> working on something...
>
>
> Can I fix H
Hi,
I have a small (stupid) question regarding "Porting Debian Packages". I
already know the answer but I have to ask anyway before I start working on
something...
Can I fix Hurd package build errors (simple ones like PATH_MAX) on a Linux
system?
I know (I guess... I hope!) that the
18 matches
Mail list logo
