Hi,
On 3/18/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I also find "secure chroot implementation" in the list. IMHO, the
> > unsafty of chroot is not caused by passive translator. In fact,
> > currently chroot is implemented totally at client side by changing the
> > INIT_PORT_CRDIR po
Scribit [EMAIL PROTECTED] dies 18/03/2008 hora 16:38:
> Now the problem is that a chrooted process can create a passive
> translator. When this translated node is accessed, the translator
> process currently won't be started in the context of the chrooted
> process, but in that of the normal global
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 12:47:23AM +0800, Wei Shen wrote:
> I read the project ideas list, and found "server overriding mechanism"
> is there. I have once tried investigating this issue, but failed to
> continue at last. Still, I wonder whether I should submit my
> modification to Glibc for a
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 10:03:29PM +0100, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote:
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > You would soon have to decide whether you want to apply as student
> > again, or mentor the project. (Or just do it independently as you
> > planned...) It's not possible to do both :-)
>
>
Hi,
I read the project ideas list, and found "server overriding mechanism" is
there. I have once tried investigating this issue, but failed to continue at
last. Still, I wonder whether I should submit my modification to Glibc for
an simple implementation of socket server overriding, though the wor
Hi,
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > Especially the project list needs work. Some of the project
>> > descriptions are only skeletons; I lack the knowledge to fill in the
>> > details. But I know that some of you have much better understanding
>> > about some of these projects.
>>
>> I noticed `
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 11:43:12PM +0100, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote:
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Especially the project list needs work. Some of the project
> > descriptions are only skeletons; I lack the knowledge to fill in the
> > details. But I know that some of you have much better
Hello,
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> For those who haven't heard it yet on IRC (and also a reminder for the
> others): Unlike the last two years, when we only participated under the
> umbrella of the GNU project, this year we want to participate in GSoC as
> an organisation on our own.
T
Hi,
For those who haven't heard it yet on IRC (and also a reminder for the
others): Unlike the last two years, when we only participated under the
umbrella of the GNU project, this year we want to participate in GSoC as
an organisation on our own.
I don't know whether this will result in getting
