Thomas Bushnell BSG, le Tue 07 Nov 2006 09:33:31 -0800, a écrit :
> On Tue, 2006-11-07 at 10:26 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Claudio Fontana, le Mon 06 Nov 2006 19:14:04 -0800, a écrit :
> > > is this to be the regular header that application developers include
> > > under your sy
On Tue, 2006-11-07 at 10:26 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Claudio Fontana, le Mon 06 Nov 2006 19:14:04 -0800, a écrit :
> > is this to be the regular header that application developers include
> > under your system to see all standard string functions declared?
>
> Nope, that's only for
Hi,
Claudio Fontana, le Mon 06 Nov 2006 19:14:04 -0800, a écrit :
> is this to be the regular header that application developers include
> under your system to see all standard string functions declared?
Nope, that's only for kernel use, but I'd say it should follow C
standard, so that people are
- Original Message -
From: "Claudio Fontana" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Barry deFreese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Monday, November 06, 2006 10:14 PM
Subject: Re: Gnumach kern/strings.h
Hello,
--- Barry deFreese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
--- Barry deFreese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OK, trying to do more clean-up, I ran across
> kern/strings.h which has
> declarations for many of the string handling
> functions which I had intended
> on adding to my include/string.h.
>
> However, it only seems to be used in ddb/ and
OK, trying to do more clean-up, I ran across kern/strings.h which has
declarations for many of the string handling functions which I had intended
on adding to my include/string.h.
However, it only seems to be used in ddb/ and kern/ files. So my dilemna is
do I leave stings.h alone and let the
