On Tue, 2006-11-07 at 10:26 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Hi, > > Claudio Fontana, le Mon 06 Nov 2006 19:14:04 -0800, a écrit : > > is this to be the regular header that application developers include > > under your system to see all standard string functions declared? > > Nope, that's only for kernel use, but I'd say it should follow C > standard, so that people are not lost. > (imagine a documentation saying "#include <strings.h> instead of > <string.h>, and <printf.h> instead of <stdio.h>, and...".
It would be wise to make the strings header have the same name. However, <printf.h> could actually be a better name for that one, because it is *not* stdio or anything near it, and it's important to flag such things. Thomas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list Bug-hurd@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
