Thomas Bushnell BSG, le Tue 07 Nov 2006 09:33:31 -0800, a écrit : > On Tue, 2006-11-07 at 10:26 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Claudio Fontana, le Mon 06 Nov 2006 19:14:04 -0800, a écrit : > > > is this to be the regular header that application developers include > > > under your system to see all standard string functions declared? > > > > Nope, that's only for kernel use, but I'd say it should follow C > > standard, so that people are not lost. > > (imagine a documentation saying "#include <strings.h> instead of > > <string.h>, and <printf.h> instead of <stdio.h>, and...". > > It would be wise to make the strings header have the same name. > > However, <printf.h> could actually be a better name for that one, > because it is *not* stdio or anything near it, and it's important to > flag such things.
Ok, that may be an exception because it's one of the few functions that actually have side effects. Samuel _______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list Bug-hurd@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
