Re: [bugs #9960] High 16 bits of st_nlink are sometimes corrupted

2004-08-11 Thread Alfred M. Szmidt
> What glibc version are you using by the way? I'm using some > semi-old CVS version (newer the Debian's, older then what is in > the CVS tree). I am using the newest glibc and Hurd packages. Before I upgraded I could not reproduce this problem. Since I just hosed my usual GNU/Hu

Re: [bugs #9960] High 16 bits of st_nlink are sometimes corrupted

2004-08-11 Thread Marco Gerards
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alfred M. Szmidt) writes: >I wonder why nobody noticed it before. > > I did; and I did report it. Where? I must have missed it. :-/ > But right now I cannot reproduce it at all. I can, easily. >rpctrace shows that ext2fs/libdiskfs is to be blamed, not glibc or >

Re: [bugs #9960] High 16 bits of st_nlink are sometimes corrupted

2004-08-11 Thread Alfred M. Szmidt
I wonder why nobody noticed it before. I did; and I did report it. But right now I cannot reproduce it at all. rpctrace shows that ext2fs/libdiskfs is to be blamed, not glibc or programs. Can you show us the rpctrace? I really doubt that this is a ext2fs/diskfs issue since neither hav

[bugs #9960] High 16 bits of st_nlink are sometimes corrupted

2004-08-10 Thread Ognyan Kulev
This mail is an automated notification from the bugs tracker of the project: The GNU Hurd. /**/ [bugs #9960] Full Item Snapshot: URL: Project: The GNU Hurd Subm