[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alfred M. Szmidt) writes: > I wonder why nobody noticed it before. > > I did; and I did report it.
Where? I must have missed it. :-/ > But right now I cannot reproduce it at all. I can, easily. > rpctrace shows that ext2fs/libdiskfs is to be blamed, not glibc or > programs. > > Can you show us the rpctrace? I really doubt that this is a > ext2fs/diskfs issue since neither have had any funky things commited > for a long time. I have the feeling this is a glibc problem (as in this glibc linked to ext2fs.static). Did the "struct stat" change? The size of nlink_t? I can reproduce this using file_name lookup + io_stat, so it is in the ext2fs server or libraries linked to it. > What glibc version are you using by the way? I'm using some semi-old > CVS version (newer the Debian's, older then what is in the CVS tree). I am using the newest glibc and Hurd packages. Before I upgraded I could not reproduce this problem. ii hurd 20040508-2 The GNU Hurd ii libc0.3 2.3.2.ds1-13.0 GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone -- Marco _______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
