Samuel Thibault writes:
> Joshua Branson, le dim. 23 févr. 2020 14:18:30 -0500, a ecrit:
>> Samuel Thibault writes:
>>
>
> It was helpful in providing a few examples we could inspire from :)
That's kind of you to say. Thanks. :)
>
> Samuel
>
--
Joshua Branson
Sent from Emacs and Gnus
Joshua Branson, le dim. 23 févr. 2020 14:18:30 -0500, a ecrit:
> Samuel Thibault writes:
>
> > Joshua Branson, le dim. 23 févr. 2020 13:10:54 -0500, a ecrit:
> >> Samuel Thibault writes:
> >> > I'm wondering which way would be more natural to users: first rule wins
> >> > versus last rule wins.
Samuel Thibault writes:
> Joshua Branson, le dim. 23 févr. 2020 13:10:54 -0500, a ecrit:
>> Samuel Thibault writes:
>> > I'm wondering which way would be more natural to users: first rule wins
>> > versus last rule wins. I can't immediately think of some example of
>> > unix command that would
Joshua Branson, le dim. 23 févr. 2020 13:10:54 -0500, a ecrit:
> Samuel Thibault writes:
> > I'm wondering which way would be more natural to users: first rule wins
> > versus last rule wins. I can't immediately think of some example of
> > unix command that would have the same question, to get i
Samuel Thibault writes:
> Hello,
>
>
> I'm wondering which way would be more natural to users: first rule wins
> versus last rule wins. I can't immediately think of some example of
> unix command that would have the same question, to get inspiration from.
> Anybody have an idea?
I can't really
El 23/2/20 a les 18:27, Samuel Thibault ha escrit:
> That could be more intuitive indeed. This looks like how ACLs work:
> uid-based rules apply first, then gid-based rules, then general rules.
> Here, exact function match rules would apply first, then slot match
> rules, then bus match rules,
Joan Lledó, le dim. 23 févr. 2020 18:12:24 +0100, a ecrit:
> El 22/2/20 a les 23:19, Samuel Thibault ha escrit:
> > AIUI you have commit rights, so you can push it yourself?
>
> Done!
Good :)
> > I'm wondering which way would be more natural to users: first rule wins
> > versus last rule wins.
>
Hi,
El 22/2/20 a les 23:19, Samuel Thibault ha escrit:
> AIUI you have commit rights, so you can push it yourself?
Done!
> I'm wondering which way would be more natural to users: first rule wins
> versus last rule wins.
No idea. Another option is to make the most specific scope win, e.g:
-U
Hello,
Joan Lledó via Bug reports for the GNU Hurd, le sam. 22 févr. 2020 13:59:09
+0100, a ecrit:
> Rename some CLI options in order to add the new -D --device arg.
>
> Replace -s by -c for subclasses.
> Replace -D by -d for domains.
> Domains are optional from now on, default to 0.
From: Joan Lledó
Rename some CLI options in order to add the new -D --device arg.
Replace -s by -c for subclasses.
Replace -D by -d for domains.
Domains are optional from now on, default to 0.
Replace -d by -s for devices.
The formerly called "devices" are now called "slots", and
Hi,
> The text is really not easy to understand
I know, I changed it a bit, hope now it's more understandable.
> I would say it would be much simpler to make the -U and -G
> options create new scopes
I reworked this and attached the two patches again.
Hello,
Joan Lledó via Bug reports for the GNU Hurd, le dim. 16 févr. 2020 13:23:35
+0100, a ecrit:
> El 15/2/20 a les 15:02, Samuel Thibault ha escrit:
> > Why a capital b? It's be more coherent to have -d -b -s -f all
> > small-caps.
> >
>
> Because of this notice in --help:
>
> "More than
Hi,
El 15/2/20 a les 15:02, Samuel Thibault ha escrit:
> Why a capital b? It's be more coherent to have -d -b -s -f all
> small-caps.
>
Because of this notice in --help:
"More than one permission scope may be specified. Uppercase options
create a new permission scope if the current one already
Hello,
Thanks for reworking this!
Joan Lledó via Bug reports for the GNU Hurd, le sam. 15 févr. 2020 12:38:52
+0100, a ecrit:
> Replace -s by -c for subclasses.
> Replace -D by -d for domains.
> Domains are optional from now on, default to 0.
> Replace -b by -B for buses.
> Bu
From: Joan Lledó
Rename some CLI options in order to add the new -d --device arg.
Replace -s by -c for subclasses.
Replace -D by -d for domains.
Domains are optional from now on, default to 0.
Replace -b by -B for buses.
Bus now creates a new permission scope if the current one
15 matches
Mail list logo
