Hi, El 15/2/20 a les 15:02, Samuel Thibault ha escrit: > Why a capital b? It's be more coherent to have -d -b -s -f all > small-caps. >
Because of this notice in --help: "More than one permission scope may be specified. Uppercase options create a new permission scope if the current one already has a value for that option. If one node is covered by more than one permission scope, only the first permission is applied to that node." The capital options create a new permission scope, for instance: -B 0 -s 5 -f 0 -B 0 -U 1000 This will create two permission scopes: 1.- 00:05.0 belongs to nobody (Error) 2.- 00:*.* belongs to 1000 (OK) The second -B has created a new scope, which leaves the previous one incomplete. -B 0 -s 5 -f 0 -s 4 -U 1000 This creates only one permission scope: 00:04.0 belongs to 1000. The second -s overrides the first one. Until now, the capital option was -D for domain, but this commit makes the domain optional and sets it to 0000 if not given. That's for compatibility with Conventional PCI. So I moved the capital option one level down, to the bus.
