Hello, Joan Lledó via Bug reports for the GNU Hurd, le sam. 22 févr. 2020 13:59:09 +0100, a ecrit: > Rename some CLI options in order to add the new -D --device arg. > > Replace -s by -c for subclasses. > Replace -D by -d for domains. > Domains are optional from now on, default to 0. > Replace -d by -s for devices. > The formerly called "devices" are now called "slots", and > "device" will refer to a combination of > Domain + Bus + Slot + Function > Only -G and -U options create new permission scopes.
Ok, this looks good to me, thanks! AIUI you have commit rights, so you can push it yourself? Just one thing, which I believe shouldn't prevent from commiting what you have already: > +If one device is covered by more than one \ > +permission scope, only the first permission is applied."; I'm wondering which way would be more natural to users: first rule wins versus last rule wins. I can't immediately think of some example of unix command that would have the same question, to get inspiration from. Anybody have an idea? Samuel
