I ran into a strange problem today when running x under the hurd.
I noticed that I was not able to load some programs under X as a user.
At first I thought that this was a user vs root permissions problem
because I hadn't seen this under the root login.
But I found out by ldd'ing some of the p
When building today (yesterday..time flies.) I was getting error
messages from the make-deps call in hurd/Makeconf
the sed lines below look innocuous until they are used within a
directory (like libstore) where there is a directory prefixing the
dependencies for unzip inflate do-bunzip2 and utils
Title: Á¦¸ñ ¾øÀ½
º» ¸ÞÀÏÀº Á¤º¸Åë½ÅºÎ ±Ç°í »çÇ׿¡ ÀÇ°Å
Á¦¸ñ¿¡ [±¤°í]¶ó Ç¥½ÃµÈ ±¤°í ¸ÞÀÏÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
¼ö½Å°ÅºÎ
¹öÆ°À» Ŭ¸¯ÇÏ½Ã¸é ¼ö½Å°ÅºÎ󸮰¡ ÀÌ·ç¾î Áý´Ï´Ù.
___
Bug-hurd mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bu
Patch #310 has been updated.
Project:
Category: libdiskfs
Status: Closed
Summary: use preprocessor rather than sprintf
Follow-Ups:
Date: 2002-May-12 01:04
By: neal
Comment:
This patch is unnecessary. As Roland said in a private email, we cannot make the
assumption that we can stringify PF_
Patch #310 has been updated.
Project:
Category: libdiskfs
Status: Closed
Summary: use preprocessor rather than sprintf
Follow-Ups:
Date: 2002-May-12 01:04
By: neal
Comment:
This patch is unnecessary. As Roland said in a private email, we cannot make the
assumption that we can stringify PF_
> Sorry. I meant to have the library do the change itself in execve
> when it's needed (since usually it's a nop) instead of expecting the
> exec server to do it.
Just to keep the record straight, I was talking about having the filesystem
implementing file_exec do it (that's where the only auth
Title: Digital Authoring Tools : Featured Product Alert
Digital books are a cost-effective and time efficient way to
attract new business, strengthen customer relationships, generate revenue
and extend the overall lifetime value of your
custom
Patch #310 has been updated.
Project:
Category: libdiskfs
Status: Closed
Summary: use preprocessor rather than sprintf
Follow-Ups:
Date: 2002-May-12 03:04
By: neal
Comment:
This patch is unnecessary. As Roland said in a private email, we cannot make the
assumption that we can stringify PF_
Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Mmh, we could restrict the monitor to trusted filesystems (eg /).
Right, but that's already a Hurd-specific extension. So it's fine to
expect it to use another Hurd-specific extension to get a reliable PID
or other identification.
> I am not reall
Hi,
considering that the output of an update below is actually more useful than
the patch message itself ;), I have enabled sending messages on all updates.
If this is too noisy, it's easily switched off.
Thanks,
Marcus
- Forwarded message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Envelope-to: marcus@
On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 06:02:18PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I think it is absolutely mandatory that we establish the PID in a
> > trustworthy way rather than let the user provide some unique ID on its own.
> > I think there is already
> Maybe. It can be very noisy if people just diddle things around, like
> change the category back and forth or reassign the reports. I am not sure
> what the update messages look like (I wish the patch mails would contain the
> patch!), so we should probably just try it out.
Agreed. However,
On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 08:50:53PM -0400, Neal H. Walfield wrote:
> > I have not enabled that notifications are sent for each update to each patch
> > or support request.
>
> I think that it would actually be a good idea to enable this feature.
Maybe. It can be very noisy if people just diddle
On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 11:28:07PM -0500, Neal H Walfield wrote:
> Is there any reason that we are using the older from
> libc/sysdeps/generic/netinet/ip.h and not one similar to the one that
> Linux uses in sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/netinet/ip.h. The reason that I
> ask is that we do not have def
Patch #312 has been updated.
Project:
Category: libdiskfs
Status: Open
Summary: getting a console early at bootstrap in parsing arguments
---
For more info, visit:
http://savannah.gnu.org/patch/?func=detailpatch&patch_id=312&group_id=30
___
Patch #311 has been updated.
Project:
Category: libstore
Status: Open
Summary: remap store of multiple runs without store class support
---
For more info, visit:
http://savannah.gnu.org/patch/?func=detailpatch&patch_id=311&group_id=30
_
Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think it is absolutely mandatory that we establish the PID in a
> trustworthy way rather than let the user provide some unique ID on its own.
> I think there is already a place in the Hurd where we should do that but
> don't (wasn't that term's ter
Roland McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> To make cases like the current state less confusing, perhaps netfs (and
> diskfs) should do something special for an EOPNOTSUPP return from
> *_get_translator in lookup/getroot. It will only come up there if
> S_IPTRANS is set, which the *_validate_st
Patch #310 has been updated.
Project:
Category: libdiskfs
Status: Open
Summary: use preprocessor rather than sprintf
---
For more info, visit:
http://savannah.gnu.org/patch/?func=detailpatch&patch_id=310&group_id=30
Roland McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Oh this is horrible. Sigh. However, in the normal case, the ids
> > don't change. Is there a security reason we should not allow the user
> > to decide for themselves?
>
> "Allow the user to decide for themselves" does not have a precise meaning
Patch #309 has been updated.
Project:
Category: libihash
Status: Open
Summary: allow inlining struct ihash
---
For more info, visit:
http://savannah.gnu.org/patch/?func=detailpatch&patch_id=309&group_id=30
__
> I have not enabled that notifications are sent for each update to each patch
> or support request.
I think that it would actually be a good idea to enable this feature.
___
Bug-hurd mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/
Patch #308 has been updated.
Project:
Category: libtrivfs
Status: Open
Summary: convert hook variables into callback functions
---
For more info, visit:
http://savannah.gnu.org/patch/?func=detailpatch&patch_id=308&group_id=30
__
Patch #307 has been updated.
Project:
Category: None
Status: Open
Summary: libmemdir, for servers providing mostly static directories
---
For more info, visit:
http://savannah.gnu.org/patch/?func=detailpatch&patch_id=307&group_id=30
___
Hi,
so this is how it looks if somebody submits a patch to the Savannah project.
I have set it up so that it sends one such notification for each patch to
this list, and for each support request one similar notification to help-hurd.
I have not enabled that notifications are sent for each updat
Patch #306 has been updated.
Project:
Category: libshouldbeinlibc
Status: Open
Summary: idvec_merge_implied_gids does not merge in secondary IDs
---
For more info, visit:
http://savannah.gnu.org/patch/?func=detailpatch&patch_id=306&group_id=
Hi,
for POSIX locking and shared memory, the filesystem needs to establish the
callers identity (its PID). Well, actually, in some cases, a system wide
unique ID would be enough. For example in the case of file locks, it would
be enough to have a send right to a receive right in the caller's ta
¸ÅÀÏ 5ÀÇ ¹è¼ö °í°´´Ô¿¡°Ô(5¹ø°, 10¹ø°, 15¹ø°..) ±¸¸Å°í°´¿¡°Ô ÈÞ´ë¿ë¶óµð¿À¸¦
µå¸³´Ï´Ù. ¸ÅÀÏ Àú³á ¼îÇθô °Ô½ÃÆÇ¿¡¼ È®ÀÎÇÏ½Ç ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.
±â°¡µð½ºÅ©
700M [¹úÅ© 100Àå]+ÆäÀÎÆ®¸¶Å©
OP 700M [¹úÅ©
100Àå]+ÆäÀÎÆ®¸¶Å©(Èò»ö)
MONARCH 700
___
Bug-hurd mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 04:17:25PM -0400, Roland McGrath wrote:
> Oh yeah, the patch:
> + err = netfs_validate_stat (netfs_root_node, 0);
> + if (err)
> +error (6, err, "Cannot stat underlying node");
> +
> + netfs_root_node->nn_stat.st_mode &= ~(S_IPTRANS | S_IATRANS);
> + netfs_root_nod
Roland McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yes, that seems to be a bona fide bug based on a misreading of the
> standard. The language is not really all that clear, but the
> behavior of other systems is consistent so we can tell how to read
> it. That is, svuid=euid and svgid=egid are done *
> Oh this is horrible. Sigh. However, in the normal case, the ids
> don't change. Is there a security reason we should not allow the user
> to decide for themselves?
"Allow the user to decide for themselves" does not have a precise meaning
to me in this context. Please specify.
___
Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> For shared libraries, we use MAP_COPY. Maybe we can use this for
> executables, too?
That is what we do, but the present issue is different; we're talking
only about atomicity: that is, if you write the file, then your exec
is either the pre-write
> Linux doesn't allow any writes to shared libraries or executables that are
> currently running:
We know. It sucks wet goat farts.
> For shared libraries, we use MAP_COPY. Maybe we can use this for
> executables, too?
We do. The virtual copying behavior is enabled by a Boolean argument to
v
Yes, that seems to be a bona fide bug based on a misreading of the
standard. The language is not really all that clear, but the behavior of
other systems is consistent so we can tell how to read it. That is,
svuid=euid and svgid=egid are done *on every exec*, not just on s[ugi]id ones.
This is
On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 04:40:36PM -0400, Roland McGrath wrote:
> AFAIK other systems do not always
> provide this guarantee, e.g. none I'm aware of do for NFS; I don't know
> whether other current systems in fact make the guarantee for disk files.)
> I'm not saying it's not a worthwhile thing to
> Only that it's essentially untested, and really deprecated. Roland, do
> you think it's worth keeping around? Is there another way to guarantee
> correct exec behavior? (Like, say, reading the entire file in a single
> RPC; is that enough?)
I didn't realize that the io_map_cntl stuff was dep
Oh yeah, the patch:
Index: fakeroot.c
===
RCS file: /cvsroot/hurd/hurd/trans/fakeroot.c,v
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -u -b -p -r1.6 fakeroot.c
--- fakeroot.c 6 May 2002 00:40:14 - 1.6
+++ fakeroot.c 11 May 2002 20:13:1
The intent of fakeroot is to be unaware of translators in the underlying
directory tree. That is, to use the translated nodes transparently; that's
why its lookups don't use O_NOTRANS. If you think about it, that's the
only thing that really makes sense for a translator applied to whole
director
On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 10:22:21AM -0500, Neal H Walfield wrote:
> 2002-04-02 Neal H Walfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * io-restrict-auth.c (diskfs_S_io_restrict_auth): When checking
> the result of a function, be sure to first save the result.
This part was rewritten by Roland in 0
I have checked these in, thanks.
On Thu, Nov 22, 2001 at 01:08:44AM +0100, Neal H Walfield wrote:
> libdiskfs:
>
> 2001-11-20 Neal H Walfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * diskfs.h (diskfs_boot_filesystem): Documentation fix.
>
>
> ext2fs:
>
> 2001-11-20 Neal H Walfield <[EMAIL PROT
On Sat, Nov 17, 2001 at 12:15:00AM +0100, Neal H Walfield wrote:
> > Those void functions you changed to error_t can never fail, so I don't see
> > the point. The actual diskfs_make_node changes seem ok.
>
> They can never fail today, however, I thought it made the interface a
> bit more consist
On Thu, Nov 15, 2001 at 11:51:21PM +0100, Neal H Walfield wrote:
> Now that we have nice tag files, they should be deleted when the user
> runs `make distclean'.
This looks quite good to me. I think you can check it in (I suppose you
have tested it).
Thanks,
Marcus
--
`Rhubarb is no Egyptian
Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It seems that the shared I/O code is not really tested and a bit dated.
> Thomas, do you remember any unresolved issues about it?
Only that it's essentially untested, and really deprecated. Roland,
do you think it's worth keeping around? Is there
On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 10:11:39PM +0200, Neal H Walfield wrote:
> > Package: hurd
> > Version: 20010718-1
> >
> > In GNU/Hurd, screen (3.9.9-2) does not paste the complete text from
> > the buffer. (In GNU/Linux, this problem does not arise with the same
> > version of screen.)
> >
> > If you c
¾ö¼±ÇÑ ¸íȵéÀ» ¿µ¾îÇнÀ Àü¿ë ÇÁ·Î±×·¥ÀÎ "CCFE ¿µÈº¸±â"¸¦ »ç¿ëÇÏ¿© À½¼º´ÙÁß±â´É, ¿µ¹®ÀÚ¸·,
¹«Çѹݺ¹, ¹Þ¾Æ¾²±â, ´Ü¾î°Ë»ö µî ¿µ¾îÇнÀÀÇ È¿°ú¸¦ ÃÖ´ë·Î Áõ´ë½Ãų ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.
¡Ø ¸ÞÀÏ ¼ö½ÅÀ» ¿øÇÏÁö ¾ÊÀ»½Ã
- ¾Æ·¡ ÀԷ¶õ¿¡ °ÅºÎÇÏ½Ç ¸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼
ºÎ¾÷¹×¾Ë¹Ù(ÀçÅØÅ©&ÇÁ·£Â÷ÀÌÁî)
ºÎ¾÷ ¹× ¾Ë¹Ù (ÀçÅØÅ©&ÇÁ·£Â÷ÀÌÁî)½±°Ô ÇÒ¼öÀÖ´Â ÀÏ! ÇöÀç ¸ðÁýÁß
¸ð¸£¼Åµµ ½±°Ô ÇÒ¼ö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.¹®ÀÇ:star21.starhana.com
´ëÇѹα¹¿¡¼ ½ÇÀü µ·¹ú±â ¹æ¹ý°ú ÀÎÅÍ³Ý ´ë¸®Á¡ÀÇ ¿î¿µ
Áö±Ý ¹Ù·Î »ç¿ëÇÒ ¼ö ¹æ¹ýµéÀ»
On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 05:12:15AM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> This is indeed what happens, here in more detail:
What I describe here is the error in the passive translator case.
I tried this change:
diff -u -p -r1.6 fakeroot.c
--- fakeroot.c 6 May 2002 00:40:14 - 1.6
+++ fakeroo
On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 11:02:18PM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> is it difficult to resurrect the execdata stream stuff in exec for libio
> based systems? It is required to start programs from filesystem which don't
> implement io_map, which is currently for example NFS and ftpfs.
It
Title: ÁÖ¸»¿£ ¾öû ½Î°Ô ÆË´Ï´Ù
±ÍÇÏÀÇ ¸ÞÀÏÁÖ¼Ò´Â À¥¼ÇÎ Áß¿¡¼ ¾Ë°Ô µÈ°ÍÀ̸ç, E-Mail ÁÖ¼Ò ¿Ü¿¡, ´Ù¸¥
Á¤º¸´Â °®°í ÀÖÁö ¾Ê½À´Ï´Ù.Á¤ÅëºÎ ±Ç°í»çÇ׿¡ ÀÇ°Å Á¦¸ñ¿¡ [±¤°í]¶ó°í Ç¥±âÇÑ ¸ÞÀÏÀÔ´Ï´Ù. ¿øÄ¡ ¾ÊÀ¸¸é ¾Æ·¡ÀÇ ¼ö½Å°ÅºÎ¸¦
´·¯ÁÖ¼¼¿ä
50 matches
Mail list logo
