Roland McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Oh this is horrible. Sigh. However, in the normal case, the ids > > don't change. Is there a security reason we should not allow the user > > to decide for themselves? > > "Allow the user to decide for themselves" does not have a precise meaning > to me in this context. Please specify.
Sorry. I meant to have the library do the change itself in execve when it's needed (since usually it's a nop) instead of expecting the exec server to do it. But there might be a security reason why we have to force the change to be made. But I can't possibly see what that would be. Thomas _______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
