bug#36753: The GUI installer throws an error

2019-08-14 Thread Jan
> However, “failed to build openssh” looks like another failure worth > investigating. Do you have more info as to what happened exactly, > what was printed? Can you reproduce it? It would be great if you > could post a picture of the screen at that point. Sorry for the delay, I had no free har

bug#36753: The GUI installer throws an error

2019-08-14 Thread Jan
Okay I've figured out what causes openssl build to fail - continuing installation without network connection. The installer told me network connection is required to install the system correctly, but I thought only packages will be outdated. Is it a bug?

bug#36753: The GUI installer throws an error

2019-08-22 Thread Jan
he bug anymore. None of this happens on my librebooted machine, tried hard to break the installation :). Guess that's it, thanks for your time. I'm probably going to sell this nonfree machine anyway. Jan

bug#37345: Icecat doesn't display numbers on Guix System

2019-09-08 Thread Jan
nd other programs display numbers properly. architecture: x86_64 I saw a similar bug in the database, but it's from 2017 and it was about font issue on other distributions, not on Guix System, so I submitted a new report, hope that's not a problem. Jan Wielkiewicz

bug#37345: Icecat doesn't display numbers on Guix System

2019-09-08 Thread Jan
On Sun, 08 Sep 2019 15:20:12 -0600 Jesse Gibbons wrote: > I cannot replicate. > What commit did you notice this? (guix describe) Since the beginning, not sure what commit (checked with 'guix system list-generations'), that was: "Generation 1 September 01 2019 01:15:51" Probably a fresh Guix Syste

bug#37345: Icecat doesn't display numbers on Guix System

2019-09-08 Thread Jan
y-stream/lib/Screenshots.jsm, line 102: TypeError: cache is undefined JavaScript error: resource://activity-stream/lib/Screenshots.jsm, line 102: TypeError: cache is undefined JavaScript error: resource://activity-stream/lib/Screenshots.jsm, line 102: TypeError: cache is undefined --- Jan Wielkiewicz

bug#37347: 'guix environment' fails after trying to follow the steps from "Running Guix Before It Is Installed" page

2019-09-08 Thread Jan
sers-group=guixbuild 386 ls 387 cd .. 388 ./configure 389 guix environment guix --pure 390 history As stupid and complicated as it is, something is definitely broken here. Sincerely, Jan Wielkiewicz

bug#37345: Icecat doesn't display numbers on Guix System

2019-09-09 Thread Jan
r9ia73h3hg3rra-gs-fonts-8.11/share/fonts/type1/ghostscript/n019024l.pfb: Nimbus Sans L:style=Bold Italic Jan

bug#37345: Icecat doesn't display numbers on Guix System

2019-09-09 Thread Jan
n by > guix install gs-fonts > > maybe that would work as well as or better than > guix install font-dejavu > > Idk :) This doesn't help. Anyway shouldn't the font-dejavu package be a dependency of Icecat then? Jan Wielkiewicz

bug#37347: 'guix environment' fails after trying to follow the steps from "Running Guix Before It Is Installed" page

2019-09-11 Thread Jan
er-not-found invalid Am I missing a dependency in my environment? Running "guix refresh" without ./pre-inst-env and "guix environment guix --pure" works. Jan Wielkiewicz

bug#37423: Changing the login service from GDM to SLiM and then back to GDM causes a really bad loop

2019-09-16 Thread Jan
hutdown" manualy. But reverting to a configuration with SLiM works - I can use the system with it, but can't with GDM anymore. --- Jan Wielkiewicz

bug#37347: 'guix environment' fails after trying to follow the steps from "Running Guix Before It Is Installed" page

2019-09-16 Thread Jan
Dnia 2019-09-16, o godz. 18:01:04 Ludovic Courtès napisał(a): > Hi Jan, > > Jan skribis: > > > guix/build/download.scm:313:6: In procedure tls-wrap: > > X.509 certificate of 'api.github.com' could not be verified: > > signer-not-found > > inva

bug#37423: Changing the login service from GDM to SLiM and then back to GDM causes a really bad loop

2019-09-17 Thread Jan
service and add it again). You can fix this by ensuring the > owner of the files under “/var/lib/gdm” is the current “gdm” user. > > > -- Tim Yes, this seems to be the same issue. I'll try the solution, but it needs to be fixed anyway. Hope someone works on that. Thanks for help! --- Jan

bug#37422: Setting keyboard layout with SLiM login manager doesn't work

2019-09-18 Thread Jan
ll" and "sudo guix system reconfigure /etc/config.scm" today, and the keyboard layout is still unavailable. There's a chance this bug is similar to the bug from the past, but not the same, letting it exist unnoticed. --- Jan Wielkiewicz

bug#37482: Guix fails to build libreoffice

2019-09-22 Thread Jan
enefit. > > Kind regards, > > T G-R Is there a way to skip building libreoffice, if the substitute isn't available? >Or just how quickly it can destroy an SSD. Even more fun... Waiting for a powerful libre computer from from the ground, because running on old ThinkPads forever isn't the right solution. Thanks for explanations and help, Jan Wielkiewicz

bug#37482: Guix fails to build libreoffice

2019-09-27 Thread Jan
upgrade everything but packages whose name contains “libreoffice”. Will use these options next time, thanks for the info. Jan Wielkiewicz

bug#37422: Setting keyboard layout with SLiM login manager doesn't work

2019-09-29 Thread Jan
On Sun, 29 Sep 2019 14:27:59 +0200 Wiktor Żelazny wrote: > The last thing that comes to my mind is the line: > >(use-service-modules desktop xorg) > > Have you got these in your config.scm? > > WŻ Yes I have. I wouldn't be able to run Mate DE, if I di

bug#37694: Problem with guix pull from local repository

2019-10-10 Thread Jan
:-) Hello, I'm affected by this too and have no clue how to fix it. Can't switch to previous generations. Could you please tell me how to get it to work again please (I'm a relatively new Guix user)? Jan Wielkiewicz

bug#37694: Problem with guix pull from local repository

2019-10-10 Thread Jan
On Thu, 10 Oct 2019 21:09:44 +0200 Marius Bakke wrote: > Just 'guix pull' should be sufficient. > > If that does not work, can you paste the error you are getting? Somehow pulling a few times didn't work, but now it works. Strange, don't know what have happened.

bug#37734: Mate doesn't work after guix pull

2019-10-13 Thread Jan
Hi, After running "guix pull" and "guix system reconfigure" Mate works improperly - when you try to launch an application from the start menu, Mate throws an error "couldn't run gio-launch-desktop (there's not such a file or directory)". Jan Wielkiewicz

bug#38050: Guix fails during downloading a substitute of google-brotli, throws an ugly backtrace

2019-11-10 Thread Jan
On Sun, 10 Nov 2019 17:24:15 +0100 Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Hi Jan, > > How reproducible is it? 100%? > I tried only two times by now. It doesn't happen when I run "./pre-inst-env guix build google-brotli" though. So reproducibility is equal to 100% with 25%

bug#37757: Kernel panic upon shutdown

2019-11-13 Thread Jan
Hi, I encountered the same error today. I had ran "sudo herd stop tor" and then "sudo herd stop xorg-server" and it panicked. Jan Wielkiewicz

bug#38135: Mate: missing gio-launch-desktop

2019-12-17 Thread Jan
Anyone working on this? I have this error for a few months now both on Mate and XFCE. I could try fixing this, but have no clue where to start. Any suggestions? Jan Wielkiewcz

bug#38821: Can't run guix from external drive.

2019-12-30 Thread Jan
In ice-9/command-line.scm: 189:23 1 (load/lang "/home/lain/.config/guix/current/bin/guix") In unknown file: 0 (getcwd) ERROR: In procedure getcwd: In procedure getcwd: There's no such a file or directory Jan Wielkiewicz

bug#38821: Can't run guix from external drive.

2020-01-07 Thread Jan
On Thu, 02 Jan 2020 19:37:43 +0100 Ludovic Courtès wrote: > > It most likely means that the current working directory, > /media/user/Backup, was unmounted or somehow disappeared in the > meantime. > > Can you confirm that this is the case? > > Thanks, > Ludo’. Y

bug#41196: Xfce panel, exo-open: launching applications not working

2020-05-11 Thread Jan
t: * panel: works * setting wallpaper: unknown/not tested yet etc. Jan Wielkiewicz

bug#41650: system-config-printer not working on foreign distribution - Namespace Gdk not available

2020-06-01 Thread Jan
t;, line 40, in gi.require_version('Gdk', '3.0') File "/gnu/store/27lry9d3ja2jnxhvcp45v3l6pa8fkvqz-python-pygobject-3.34.0/lib/python3.8/site-packages/gi/__init__.py", line 129, in require_version raise ValueError('Namespace %s not available' % namespace) ValueError: Namespace Gdk not available Jan Wielkiewicz

bug#21773: guix package -u "*" fails

2015-10-28 Thread Jan Synáček
ke-regexp "*"] ERROR: In procedure make-regexp: ERROR: In procedure make-regexp: Invalid preceding regular expression # guix --version warning: failed to install locale: Invalid argument guix (GNU Guix) 0.8.3 -- Jan Synáček

bug#21788: Cannot build xz (download returns 403)

2015-10-29 Thread Jan Synáček
hecked it was possible to download this one) could fix this problem. -- Jan Synáček

bug#21974: can't build guix without 'makeinfo'

2015-11-21 Thread Jan Synáček
The build fails with an error if the 'makeinfo' binary is missing on the system. The configure script should check for 'makeinfo' and fail if not found (or maybe warn that the docs won't be built?). -- Jan Synáček

bug#21976: error when building vlc-2.2.1 (sha mismatch of a dependency)

2015-11-21 Thread Jan Synáček
n't be built cannot build derivation `/gnu/store/10d780zc7bj43f71cf0pl9dl2p4q7s01-profile.drv': 1 dependencies couldn't be built guix package: error: build failed: build of `/gnu/store/10d780zc7bj43f71cf0pl9dl2p4q7s01-profile.drv' failed I'm using guix-0.9.0. -- Jan Synáček

bug#21974: can't build guix without 'makeinfo'

2015-11-21 Thread Jan Synáček
On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 9:40 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Jan Synáček skribis: > >> The build fails with an error if the 'makeinfo' binary is missing on >> the system. The configure script should check for 'makeinfo' and fail >> if not found

bug#21976: error when building vlc-2.2.1 (sha mismatch of a dependency)

2015-11-21 Thread Jan Synáček
On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 9:51 PM, Efraim Flashner wrote: > On Sat, 21 Nov 2015 21:36:28 +0100 > Jan Synáček wrote: > >> I'm getting the following error: >> >> [...] >> Starting download of >> /gnu/store/c0kix7cn1pvdq5r563r97kxm66ldnf87-ladspa_sdk_1.1

bug#21991: 'guix download' without arguments produces guile backtrace

2015-11-23 Thread Jan Synáček
I guess it should just print an error or display usage. guix 0.9.0 Cheers, -- Jan Synáček

bug#23697: guix system reconfigure hangs, shows repl in messages

2016-06-05 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
2016-06-01 19:59:57 under certain conditions; type `,show c' for details. 2016-06-01 19:59:57 2016-06-01 19:59:57 Enter `,help' for help. Greetings, Jan PS: I booted into Debian, did a new system init into /guix and am running GuixSD now. drakenvlieg.scm Description: Binary data -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.nl

bug#24390: VM with postgres service broken in master

2016-09-07 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
ctivation.scm: ... 152:20 (add-user "postgres" "postgres" #:uid #f #:comment "Po#" #) In unknown file: 0 (system* "useradd" "-g" "postgres" "-c" "PostgresSQL" se#" #) I'm not sure how to debug this

bug#25442: Emacs compilation buffer segfault

2017-01-13 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Hi! Running bash crash.nw in an xterm makes Emacs segfault about 4 out of 5 times for me. Greetings, Jan crash.nw Description: Binary data mes.crash Description: Binary data -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar®

bug#25442: stacktrace

2017-01-14 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Find attached. There is no debugging info, is there a package that I can install which includes the debugging symbols? stacktrace Description: Binary data -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.nl

bug#25442: stacktrace

2017-01-14 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
ere; I built Emacs from GIT and there the problem is not present. Looking at the diff from 25.1 until HEAD I do not see any obvious patches, neither does the git log point me to one. Greetings, Jan bt Description: Binary data -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.nl

bug#25442: stacktrace

2017-01-15 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
e, with our packaging. So apparently it has been fixed upstream. Thanks! Greetings, Jan -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.nl

bug#25782: guile: one test fails on Debian/HURD

2017-02-17 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
emporarily unavailable\n$1 = 42\n") I'm using wip-hurd-native from https://gitlab.com/janneke/guix.git which adds to https://github.com/Phant0mas/guix-on-hurd.git a newer bootstrap guile and a procps-ng patch. --janneke -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilyp

bug#25442: stacktrace

2017-09-30 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes: > That's a good suggestion. I have tried this and the bug is also gone > here, with our packaging. So apparently it has been fixed upstream. long fixed, long -done. janneke -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://Joyo

bug#24390: VM with postgres service broken in master

2017-09-30 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Ludovic Courtès writes: > Sorry for not answering earlier. I cannot reproduce it with > v0.11.0-2111-g85533e2 and with the config you sent. > > Could you check on your side? Sorry for not getting back earlier. I've been running postgres VM's for quite some time

bug#28659: v0.13: guix pull fails; libgit2-0.26.0 and 0.25.1 content hashes fail

2017-10-01 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
51 0 13270978 156 0 13294081 0 157 13294082 0 162 13294083 0 151 13294084 0 147 13294085 0 151 13294086 0 156 13294087 0 57 13294519 57 0 13294520 157 0 13294521 162 0 13294522 151 0 13294523 147 0 13294524 151 0 1

bug#28659: v0.13: guix pull fails; libgit2-0.26.0 and 0.25.1 content hashes fail

2017-10-01 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes: The changing of the libgit-0.26.0 checksum was already reported about 3 weeks ago (github seems to only show relative dates) https://github.com/libgit2/libgit2/issues/4343 and the bug is still open. It seems to be a github thing. As I understand it, currently our

bug#28659: v0.13: guix pull fails; libgit2-0.26.0 and 0.25.1 content hashes fail

2017-10-02 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
...it might be fine? Do we want/need to bring out a new release for this, e.g. 0.13.1, or even 0.14? I'm not sure how bad it is that --no-substitutes does not work. I think working on guix pull to not compile everything locally may have priority? janneke -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyP

bug#28659: v0.13: guix pull fails; libgit2-0.26.0 and 0.25.1 content hashes fail

2017-10-02 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Ludovic Courtès writes: > Right. Jan suggested checking the content-addressed mirrors *before* > the real upstream address. That would address the problem of upstream > sources modified in-place, but at the cost of privacy/self-sufficiency > as you note. (Though it’s not really mak

bug#28659: v0.13: guix pull fails; libgit2-0.26.0 and 0.25.1 content hashes fail

2017-10-04 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
hat's hardly being lucky? janneke -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.com

bug#28731: guix weather backtrace on https://mirror.guixsd.org

2017-10-07 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
http://guix.oban.verum.com:8181 http://guix2.oban.verum.com:8181 http://janneke.lilypond.org:8080"; *) 3ae76f7f5 gnu: vsearch: Update to 2.5.0. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.com

bug#28745: tarballs generated on github are generated on demand (leading to different hash sums)

2017-10-08 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
ure, see bug#28659 ...possbily this needs to be merged that bug. janneke -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.com

bug#28284: GCC 4.7.4 fails to build since April 2017

2017-11-06 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
(getenv "BUILD_PATH_PREFIX_MAP")) Greetings, janneke >From b2fb0adc3e0de7194493a0c5f1f9bbdbcd0a4087 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2017 22:50:05 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] gnu: gcc-4.7: Resurrect building with gcc-5.4.0. * gnu/packages/pat

bug#29186: building guile-emacs fails: required libaries not found: libjpeg

2017-11-06 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
igure' failed after 10.5 seconds Obviously that's fu, because libjpeg-8 is available. I tried several things, previous versions of libjpeg; not sure what's going on here. Greetings, janneke -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyofSourc

bug#29186: building guile-emacs fails: required libaries not found: libjpeg

2017-11-07 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
-f batch-update-autoloads ../../git-checkout/lisp/calendar make[2]: *** [Makefile:466: ../../git-checkout/lisp/calendar/cal-loaddefs.el] Segmentation fault Greetings, janneke >From c0cecb3e3f39de01c674dadf8949186e94d5fb9b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2017 08

bug#28284: GCC 4.7.4 fails to build since April 2017

2017-11-07 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
r [env] so indeed, it looks fine; and it makes sense. I was working on the $ORIGIN stuff inside (a copy of) the gcc-4.7.4 builder -- that code is of course (re)used by all other gcc packages. Greetings, janneke >From 22d5353991784409e3a8e671611c5ccff3ff7b68 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From:

bug#29196: upstreaming of reproducibility related patches

2017-11-07 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
patches. I think some effort has gone (is going?) into a email template that starts by explaining what reproducible-builds is, why it is important and why upstream should consider taking the patch. Greetings, janneke -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http

bug#29186: building guile-emacs fails: required libaries not found: libjpeg

2017-11-07 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes: > However, now the build fails with a segfault: > > EMACSLOADPATH= '../src/bootstrap-emacs' -batch --no-site-file --no-site-lisp > -l autoload \ >--eval "(setq generate-autoload-cookie \"###cal-autoload\")" \ >

bug#28284: GCC 4.7.4 fails to build since April 2017

2017-11-07 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
me to get in if at all. We'll have to see what the pros and cons are. Different story/thread. >> From 22d5353991784409e3a8e671611c5ccff3ff7b68 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen >> Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2017 22:50:05 +0100 >> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: gcc-4.7:

bug#29186: building guile-emacs fails: required libaries not found: libjpeg

2017-11-08 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Efraim Flashner writes: > Will it build with libjpeg-turbo or libjpeg-9? I'm not sure how feasable > it is, but I'd like to remove libjpeg-8 (and some other old libraries) > if its possible. As communicated over irc; yes, it build with libjpeg-9. janneke -- Jan Nieuwenhui

bug#29186: building guile-emacs fails: required libaries not found: libjpeg

2017-11-08 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
(lambda _ >> (zero? (system* "sh" "autogen.sh")) > > Couldn't this be a make-flag or a configure-flag? Yes, as a configure flags also works. However, I tracked down the segfault, backported a patch and and now it builds with -O2. New patch

bug#29186: building guile-emacs fails: required libaries not found: libjpeg

2017-11-14 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
o to Robin Templeton . They were the most recent committer from where we're pulling. They haven't responded yet. Let me know if you know a better address/can we do better? I can wait a bit more and push if I don't hear anything the coming week. janneke -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen |

bug#29186: building guile-emacs fails: required libaries not found: libjpeg

2017-11-25 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Ludovic Courtès writes: > I think you can now push the patch in Guix. Thanks, push to master as 68cb962a8d6d384a02e3e8eac23af2582d73c6e7 janneke -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.com

bug#30537: glibc 2.26 refuses to run on CentOS 6.8

2018-02-19 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
iscovered at Verum that a guix pack would not run on CentOS and took another road in the end. Good to know there's still a way to work around this. Thanks, janneke -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.com

bug#30922: LUKS-encrypted root fails using device numbering, needs luksUUID

2018-03-24 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
(cons* (dhcp-client-service) (console-keymap-service "dvorak" "ctrl") (service openssh-service-type (openssh-configuration (port-number ) (permit-root

bug#31956: guix environment: add option to download and unpack source

2018-06-24 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
ersome. It could be an ad-hoc, new git archive. It would also be nice if Guix could somehow record upstream sources as (shallow?, tarred?) git archives. janneke -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.com

bug#26608: bug#22629: “Stable” branch

2018-08-31 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
would be useful to provide a way to avoid installing something that is cricitally broken, like Debian's apt-listbugs package/facility (https://packages.debian.org/sid/apt-listbugs). janneke -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyofSourc

bug#32749: package-with-explicit-inputs leaks-in additional inputs

2018-09-17 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Hi! Rewriting the bootstrap on the wip-bootstrap branch I found additional inputs in packages that use `package-with-explicit-inputs', such as diffutils-boot0. I would expect diffutils-boot0 to list just one extra input in addition to gnu-make-boot0; namely the package gnu-make-boot0; however it

bug#32749: package-with-explicit-inputs leaks-in additional inputs

2018-09-17 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes: > Should `package-with-explicit-inputs' behave like I think it does, i.e., > should both test packages list the same dependencies, or am I missing > something? Printing the packages in the Guix Repl gives this result --8<---cut here---

bug#32749: package-with-explicit-inputs leaks-in additional inputs

2018-09-17 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Ludovic Courtès writes: > The difference comes from the fact that ‘gnu-make-explicit-inputs’ has > Guile in its ‘inputs’: Ah, I missed that! > scheme@(gnu packages pawei)> (package-direct-inputs gnu-make-explicit-inputs) > $5 = (("libc" # 3d216c0>) ("gcc" # 3d21600>) ("binutils" # gnu/packages/b

bug#32749: package-with-explicit-inputs leaks-in additional inputs

2018-09-18 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Ludovic Courtès writes: >> I tried this! The dependencies look OK, but the package won't build -- >> there's no tar, make etc. > > Ah, true! > >> ...but that looks a bit strange: if we have to mention the inputs a >> second time the advantage over using the `gnu-make-no-implicit-inputs' >> packag

bug#33496: bug#33500: bug#33496: Guix pull failing to compute derivation

2018-11-25 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
st_libexecSCRIPTS") ;guix-authenticate + "install-nodist_pkglibexecSCRIPTS") ;; We need to tell 'guix-daemon' which 'guix' command to use. ;; Here we use a questionable hack where we hard-code root's -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.com

bug#43384: guix pull: backtrace "no route to host"

2020-09-13 Thread Jan Wielkiewicz
bb88b39dda285482b332a24dae66"; system: "x86_64-linux"; host version: "1192ae940434808560b3170107e4ce44855816c3"; pull-version: 1). Please report it by email to . Jan Wielkiewicz

bug#43166: The issues.guix.gnu.org is hard to read in emacs-w3m.

2020-09-15 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
font-family: monospace; display: block; } ... here, or otherwise "eats" spaces; so diffs/patches are still a bit annoying to read. Ideas? Greetings, Janneke -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.com

bug#43435: bootstrap (bash-mesboot0) and ’make release’ error

2020-09-15 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
igprocmask' defined twice would pass the check, but this triggers a rebuld world. So I am proposing the attached patch that breaks the comment to pass the check, and using unquoted string-append to avoid a world rebuild. Greetings, Janneke >From 7256bae0eebbec22c42a482ccfdf12fd8b874188

bug#43005: make dist fails: "store file names embedded in the distribution"

2020-09-16 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Ludovic Courtès writes: Hello, > Jan Nieuwenhuizen skribis: > >> Oops; your patch is fine (see nit-pick) for core-updates; but as you >> noticed, on master we need to add an indirection to avoid rebuilds. >> What about something like >> diff --git a/gnu/packages/c

bug#43005: make dist fails: "store file names embedded in the distribution"

2020-09-16 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Vagrant Cascadian writes: Hi! > On 2020-09-16, Ludovic Courtès wrote: >> Hello! >> >> Jan Nieuwenhuizen skribis: >>> This is the closing parenthesis of a string-append that has only this >>> one big string; what about removing that string-append altoget

bug#43533: guix-daemon fails to start in Childhurd

2020-09-20 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
etings, Janneke *) For the Hurd that currently is something like: GUIX_LOCPATH=/gnu/store/z7a6sbvqzb5zapwpznmjkq2rsxil6i67-glibc-utf8-locales-2.31/lib/locale\ LC_ALL=en_US.utf8\ guix-daemon --build-users-group guixbuild --max-silent-time 0 --timeout 0 --log-compression bzip2 --s

bug#43533: guix-daemon fails to start in Childhurd

2020-09-21 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
breaks everything if the operating system does not support > namespaces. > > Fixed with 6453915cf7729203ef9552c13cb4528c6f4ed122. Yay, I can confirm that it works! > Sorry for the breakage, Thanks for the quick fix and explanation, I didn't catch that no-op trick! It's all about context/knowledge I

bug#43668: Daemon tries to build GNU/Hurd derivations on GNU/Linux

2020-09-28 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
ion tag) OS: Hurd, ABI: 0.0.0 --8<---cut here---end--->8--- > So I think we can’t count on an ‘execve’ error and thus have to treat > this case (same architecture but different OS kernel) specially, as > shown below. > > Thoughts? If that

bug#43668: Daemon tries to build GNU/Hurd derivations on GNU/Linux

2020-09-29 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Ludovic Courtès writes: Hi! > Jan Nieuwenhuizen skribis: > >>> Ludovic Courtès skribis: >>> >> Displaying notes found in: .note.ABI-tag >> OwnerData size Description >> GNU 0x0010NT_GNU_ABI_TAG (AB

bug#39819: Declarative /etc/guix/acl?

2020-10-11 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
tc? I think so. Yes, I think so too. However, if you have your own substitute server, you now can run guix archive --authorize < ..., e.g. at bootstrap/install time. For such cases, IWBN to have a --authorized-key argument to guix build / guix system. Greetings, Janneke -- Jan Nieuwenhui

bug#39819: Declarative /etc/guix/acl?

2020-10-12 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Ludovic Courtès writes: Hello, > Jan Nieuwenhuizen skribis: > >> Ludovic Courtès writes: > >> However, if you have your own substitute server, you now can run guix >> archive --authorize < ..., e.g. at bootstrap/install time. For such >> cases, IWBN to have

bug#44000: Guile-Git cross-compiled to i586-pc-gnu gets bytestructures wrong

2020-10-15 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
pull’ in my childhurd :-)). Wow, beautiful! > Let’s see whether it needs to be adapted for inclusion upstream. Yes, sure. Greetings, Janneke -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.com

bug#39819: [PATCH 1/2] services: guix: Make /etc/guix/acl really declarative by default.

2020-10-24 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
;; time. > + (modify-services %base-services/hurd > + (guix-service-type config => > +(guix-configuration > + (inherit config) > +

bug#44261: running a daemon with userns in relocateble pack breaks

2020-10-27 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
anneke@dundal:~/src/guix/master/vork [env] $ Backtrace: Exception thrown while printing backtrace: In procedure public-lookup: Module named (system repl debug) does not exist --8<---cut here-------end--->8--- Greetings, Janneke vork.scm Description: Binary data

bug#44261: running a daemon with userns in relocateble pack breaks

2020-10-27 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes: Hi! I tried the hint from Ludovic to use MS_PRIVATE in the attached patch and that works for me; not sure if we want a test and even less sure how to write that... Janneke >From fd3104608c3fa6a2375b6c7df0862e5479976b39 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Jan

bug#25782: guile: one test fails on Debian/HURD

2020-10-28 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
zimoun writes: Hello zimoun, > On Sat, 18 Feb 2017 at 07:24, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: >> Running >> >> ./pre-inst-env guix package -i hello >> >> on Debian/HURD one test fails when building Guile >> >> Running 00-repl-server.test >>

bug#44261: running a daemon with userns in relocateble pack breaks

2020-10-30 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Yes, I think this is acceptable. > If you confirm that it works for you and looks reasonable, we can apply > it. Yes, this works. The test and also my reproducer now work fine. Thanks a lot! Janneke -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.com

bug#44261: running a daemon with userns in relocateble pack breaks

2020-10-31 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Ludovic Courtès writes: Hello, > Jan Nieuwenhuizen skribis: > >> Ludovic Courtès writes: > > [...] > >>> If you confirm that it works for you and looks reasonable, we can apply >>> it. >> >> Yes, this works. The test and also my reproducer n

bug#45165: binutils-mesboot0 fails at configure, cannot find lex

2020-12-10 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
annot find output from lex; giving up +make: *** [configure-ld] Error 1 --8<---cut here---end--->8--- What is your build environment/version of guix you're using? It looks like some unreproducible bit is leaking in somewhere?? Greetings, Janneke --

bug#45618: development childhurd fails to build: glib@2.62.6: build system `meson'

2021-01-03 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
uckily, this fixed commit also builds the childhurd again...so I'm starting a new bisect. This is not funny; it means I either cannot reconfigure, or I'm losing my childhurd...grmbl. Sorry for not noticing this earlier! Greetings, Janneke devel-hurd.tmpl Description: Bina

bug#45867: hurd-vm: custom disk-size ignored

2021-01-14 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
-type-constructor type))) -(system-image (os->image os +(system-image + (image (inherit (os->image os)) +(size disk-size) (define (hurd-vm-port config base) "Return the forwarded vm port for this childhurd config." Greetings, Janneke -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.com

bug#45867: hurd-vm: custom disk-size ignored

2021-01-14 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes: > On current master, setting a bigger disk-size for a childhurd > > (service hurd-vm-service-type >(hurd-vm-configuration > (disk-size (* 12 (expt 2 30))) ;12GiB > > > is being ignored. I am suspecting [..]

bug#45618: development childhurd fails to build: glib@2.62.6: build system `meson'

2021-01-14 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes: Hello, > On current master > > 395489cdc959c3f3c026bf545c3ed95efc9919f0 > gnu: spice-vdagent: Update to 0.20.0. > > building > > ./pre-inst-env guix system disk-image --target=i586-pc-gnu > gnu/system/examples/devel-hurd.tmpl &g

bug#45962: ‘binutils-mesboot0’ includes non-zero timestamps in ar archives

2021-03-03 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
in the bootstrap that includes also 'patch'. See also gcc-core-mesboot0: it applies the patch in a manual phase. So I'm not sure if we want to start depending on 'xz' an this stage? Greetings, Janneke -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.com

bug#45962: ‘binutils-mesboot0’ includes non-zero timestamps in ar archives

2021-03-09 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Ludovic Courtès writes: Hey Ludo! > Jan Nieuwenhuizen skribis: > > I can think of two possibilities, then: (1) apply the patch in a phase > rather than via the ‘patches’ field, and (2) arrange so that > ‘patch-and-repack’ does not compress the patched code or compresses it >

bug#47055: guix upgrade throws a backtrace

2021-03-10 Thread Jan Wielkiewicz
t;&irri…>) 1669:16 2 (raise-exception _ #:continuable? _) 1667:16 1 (raise-exception _ #:continuable? _) V)ï¾ÉD­substitution of /gnu/store/9iyfc2g1585ps9danh95p0mw56pw8ik5-bison-3.5.3 failed _ #:continuable? _)ð­^zܪÅszò guix system: error: corrupt input while restoring archive from # Jan Wielkiewicz

bug#48223: EXWM knows nothing about Guix profiles

2021-05-08 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
ot; "tcp" --8<---cut here---end--->8--- and now use the attached exwm, which works OK for me. Greetings, Janneke exwm Description: Binary data -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.com

bug#33795: Update mes-minimal-stripped-tarball to Mes 0.19 on gnu.org

2018-12-18 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
o with a rewrite of the url this commit. Sorry for updating so soon, I sure hope we can keep this Mes-0.19 for quite some time. janneke -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.com

bug#33795: Update mes-minimal-stripped-tarball to Mes 0.19 on gnu.org

2018-12-20 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
lpha.gnu.org/gnu/guix/bootstrap/20181020 alongside the other tarballs. > > Sounds good? Beautiful. I'll rewrite the one commit to not introduce the lilypond.org URL and push my core-updates to savannah. > Thank you! Yes, thank you! Then we can inform Eelco on the new, fast boots

bug#33795: Update mes-minimal-stripped-tarball to Mes 0.19 on gnu.org

2018-12-20 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes: >> If that’s fine with you, I’ll upload >> mes-minimal-stripped-0.19-x86_64-linux.tar.xz to >> alpha.gnu.org/gnu/guix/bootstrap/20181020 alongside the other tarballs. >> >> Sounds good? > > Beautiful. I'll rewrite the one commi

  1   2   3   >