ng0 writes:
> as I wrote in #29135, we should upstream the patches we
> gather for reproducibility. Share with upstream what is
> applicable to more software than just Guix included
> definitions of the software etc.
> We have no list for this so far
> We need to share this, to avoid duplicate work elsewhere.
What about the reproducible builds list?
https://lists.reproducible-builds.org/listinfo/rb-general
General discussions about reproducible builds
<rb-gene...@lists.reproducible-builds.org>
At the reproducible-builds summit last week in Berlin some work has been
done on the topic of upstreaming patches. I think some effort has gone
(is going?) into a email template that starts by explaining what
reproducible-builds is, why it is important and why upstream should
consider taking the patch.
Greetings,
janneke
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <jann...@gnu.org> | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org
Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.com
