Ludovic Courtès writes: Hey Ludo!
> Jan Nieuwenhuizen <jann...@gnu.org> skribis: > > I can think of two possibilities, then: (1) apply the patch in a phase > rather than via the ‘patches’ field, and (2) arrange so that > ‘patch-and-repack’ does not compress the patched code or compresses it > with the bootstrap gzip. Oh, that would be nice: we could remove all these clumsy manual patching stages. Also, we may be able to remove XZ from the bootstrap chain, if no XZ-repackaging happens and only build a final version. > My understanding is that #2 may be doable now thanks to Maxim’s recent > changes. I’ll take a look! Great! Greetings, Janneke -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <jann...@gnu.org> | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.com
