Hi,
Danny Milosavljevic skribis:
> On Sun, 24 May 2020 23:27:24 +0200
> Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>
>> > $ guix environment --pure guix --ad-hoc git guile-json guile-readline
>> > $ make
>> > [ 11%] LOAD guix/scripts/download.scm
>> > ice-9/eval.scm:293:34: error: hash-algorithm: unbound vari
Hi Ludo,
On Mon, 25 May 2020 09:43:36 +0200
Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> OK, so “not-a-bug” from my perspective. :-)
Sure, buy maybe configure could check the guile-gcrypt version or something and
error out? :)
> > $ which guix
> > /usr/local/bin/guix
> > $ ls -l /usr/local/bin/guix
> > lrwxrwxrw
* hydra/nginx/berlin.scm (%berlin-servers): Add some config to the
nginx-server-configurations for guix.gnu.org.
---
hydra/nginx/berlin.scm | 14 ++
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
diff --git a/hydra/nginx/berlin.scm b/hydra/nginx/berlin.scm
index 303fd35..8c90eb1 100644
--- a/hydra/
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Hi,
>
> Christopher Baines skribis:
>
>> So I think removing the Last-Modified header from the responses will fix
>> the issue with the Repology fetcher (as it will stop thinking it's
>> already fetch the file, since it was last modified in 1970), instead it
>> will ju
Ricardo Wurmus writes:
> Some Haskell packages have a “-bootstrap” variant to cut dependency
> cycles. Unfortunately, these bootstrap variants remain in the reference
> graph alongside their non-bootstrap counterparts.
On a related note, Haskell packages retain needless references to *all*
ot
unarchive 41356
On Sun, 17 May 2020, GNU bug Tracking System wrote:
>> ```bash
>> cp: cannot stat '/root/.config/guix/current
>> /lib/systemd/system/gnu-store.mount': No such file or directory
>> chmod: cannot access '/etc/systemd/system/gnu-store.mount': No such file or
>> directory
>> ```
>
> T
Hi,
our package json-c is vulnerable to CVE-2020-12762[1]. Be careful when
applying the “fix”, since it broke a lot of packages on Ubuntu and
Gentoo[2] in the past week.
Lars
[1] https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-12762
[2] https://bugs.gentoo.org/722150
Since commit d03001a31a6d460b712825640dba11e3f1a53a14, an object like:
(file-append (local-file …) "/foo/bar")
where (local-file …) is lowered to a store item, say,
/gnu/store/…-example, would wrongfully expand to:
/gnu/store/…-example
IOW, the second argument to ‘file-append’ is ignored.
Hi—
I did a 'guix pull && guix package -u' today, but something went wrong,
tail follows:
...
./guix/store.scm:1363:15: Throw to key `srfi-34' with args `(#)'.
guix pull: error: You found a bug: the program
'/gnu/store/6naagkv776pp47zk9blnnrjwhzyq5k4b-compute-guix-derivation'
failed to compute t
Dear,
This bug [1] had not been commented since the last 3 years and it has
been asked more info 3 weeks ago. Therefore, I am closing. Feel free
to reopen if I misunderstand something.
[1] http://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/25952
All the best,
simon
Hi,
On Sat, 23 May 2020 at 17:47, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Jérémy Korwin-Zmijowski skribis:
> >$ git clone https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git
> > $ cd guix
> > $ guix environment --pure guix
> > [dev]$ ./bootstrap && ./configure --localstatedir=/var && make
Hum? instead of these:
>
Simon,
zimoun 写道：
This bug [1] had not been commented since the last 3 years and
it has
been asked more info 3 weeks ago.
The issue is that files such as /etc/guix/machines.scm (but this
applies equally to /etc/guix/acl & so on) are expected to evaluate
to a sexp.
An empty file does not a
Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
> Ricardo Wurmus writes:
>
>> Some Haskell packages have a “-bootstrap” variant to cut dependency
>> cycles. Unfortunately, these bootstrap variants remain in the reference
>> graph alongside their non-bootstrap counterparts.
>
> On a related note, Haskell packages retai
Marco van Hulten writes:
> Hi—
>
> I did a 'guix pull && guix package -u' today, but something went wrong,
> tail follows:
>
> ...
> ./guix/store.scm:1363:15: Throw to key `srfi-34' with args `(# &store-protocol-error [message: "build of
> `/gnu/store/gv21jfvr92p2rqwjp7idv7q1if44q5wl-openldap-2.
Hi Tobias,
On Mon, 25 May 2020 at 22:32, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote:
> The issue is that files such as /etc/guix/machines.scm (but this
> applies equally to /etc/guix/acl & so on) are expected to evaluate
> to a sexp.
>
> An empty file does not a valid sexp make, so Guix throws an
> prickly bac
Thovthe via web writes:
> Should this remain open?
Probably not, as there has not been movement in almost two years and
Fedora 28 is pretty old by now. I think newer versions should work.
Thanks for the bug triage!
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
>
>> Ricardo Wurmus writes:
>>
>>> Some Haskell packages have a “-bootstrap” variant to cut dependency
>>> cycles. Unfortunately, these bootstrap variants remain in the reference
>>> graph alongside their non-bootstrap counterparts.
>>
>> On
17 matches
Mail list logo
