Simon, zimoun 写道：
This bug [1] had not been commented since the last 3 years and it hasbeen asked more info 3 weeks ago.
The issue is that files such as /etc/guix/machines.scm (but this applies equally to /etc/guix/acl & so on) are expected to evaluate to a sexp.
An empty file does not a valid sexp make, so Guix throws an prickly backtrace @ your face & dies. This is unlike most other configuration formats where an empty file or one consisting entirely of comments is a no-op.
We should decide whether ‘’ is a valid sexp (oh dear, philosophy) or throw something softer at people.
Therefore, I am closing. Feel free to reopen if I misunderstand something.
I think this bug should remain open until it's decided. What you? Kind regards, T G-R
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
