Marco van Hulten <ma...@hulten.org> writes: > Hi— > > I did a 'guix pull && guix package -u' today, but something went wrong, > tail follows: > > ... > ./guix/store.scm:1363:15: Throw to key `srfi-34' with args `(#<condition > &store-protocol-error [message: "build of > `/gnu/store/gv21jfvr92p2rqwjp7idv7q1if44q5wl-openldap-2.4.50.drv' failed" > status: 100] 7f9b9a5b3e40>)'. > guix pull: error: You found a bug: the program > '/gnu/store/6naagkv776pp47zk9blnnrjwhzyq5k4b-compute-guix-derivation' > failed to compute the derivation for Guix (version: > "8c42a25b77e5cb8c97dacfdd552811a820d674eb"; system: "x86_64-linux"; > host version: "545e12f40dcd8cfc779e8802dadead7a7cdc8364"; pull-version: 1). > Please report it by email to <bug-guix@gnu.org>. > > > Longer tail: http://paste.debian.net/1148762/
One libpng test is failing. Full log included here for posterity:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
FAIL: tests/pngtest
===================
[46/1810]
Testing libpng version 1.6.37
with zlib version 1.2.11
libpng version 1.6.37
Copyright (c) 2018-2019 Cosmin Truta
Copyright (c) 1998-2002,2004,2006-2018 Glenn Randers-Pehrson
Copyright (c) 1996-1997 Andreas Dilger
Copyright (c) 1995-1996 Guy Eric Schalnat, Group 42, Inc.
library (10637): libpng version 1.6.37 - April 14, 2019
pngtest (10637): libpng version 1.6.37 - April 14, 2019
Testing ./pngtest.png:
Text compression[0]=-1
stereo mode = 1
vpAg = 100 x 100, units = 0
Text compression[0]=0
eXIf type MM, 52 bytes
Image width = 91, height
= 69
Files ./pngtest.png and pngout.png are different
Was ./pngtest.png written with the same maximum IDAT chunk size (8192
bytes),
filtering heuristic (libpng default), compression level (zlib default),
and zlib version (1.2.11)?
FAIL
libpng FAILS test
Default limits:
width_max = 1000000
height_max = 1000000
cache_max = 1000
malloc_max = 8000000
FAIL tests/pngtest (exit status: 1)
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
Is this error consistent for you, or could it have been an
indeterministic failure?
Also, did you intentionally disable binary substitutes?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
