bug#33844: Rename ghc-pandoc to pandoc

2020-12-18 Thread zimoun
On Wed, 07 Oct 2020 at 17:27, zimoun wrote: > Dear, > > On Wed, 09 Sep 2020 at 18:11, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: >> zimoun writes: > We should also rename all uses of ghc-pandoc in the same patch. > > The packages: … > >>> - rapicorn >>> - ganeti >>> - manuskript >>> - emacs-org-web-tools

bug#33844: Rename ghc-pandoc to pandoc

2020-10-07 Thread zimoun
Dear, On Wed, 09 Sep 2020 at 18:11, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > zimoun writes: >>> We should also rename all uses of ghc-pandoc in the same patch. The packages: … >> - rapicorn >> - ganeti >> - manuskript >> - emacs-org-web-tools >> - emacs-ox-pandoc >> - ruby-pandoc-ruby … now uses ’pando

bug#33844: Rename ghc-pandoc to pandoc

2020-09-09 Thread Ricardo Wurmus
zimoun writes: > Hi, > > On Wed, 26 Feb 2020 at 12:57, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > >> We should also rename all uses of ghc-pandoc in the same patch. > > Commit d4e4a3824d380e576b56a74aa714db205fcc59a4 adds pandoc. > > The packages: > > - ruby-pandoc-ruby > - rapicorn > - ganeti > - manuskript

bug#33844: Rename ghc-pandoc to pandoc

2020-09-09 Thread zimoun
Hi, On Wed, 26 Feb 2020 at 12:57, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > We should also rename all uses of ghc-pandoc in the same patch. Commit d4e4a3824d380e576b56a74aa714db205fcc59a4 adds pandoc. The packages: - ruby-pandoc-ruby - rapicorn - ganeti - manuskript - emacs-org-web-tools - emacs-ox-pando

bug#33844: Rename ghc-pandoc to pandoc

2020-02-27 Thread Mike Gerwitz
On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 14:10:15 +0100, zimoun wrote: > Well, your comment is pointing: a) that the description is badly > written and b) the 'relevance' score is too rough. [...] > The real problem is not the non-obvious name (ghc-pandoc instead of > simply pandoc) but it is: a) some description

bug#33844: Rename ghc-pandoc to pandoc

2020-02-27 Thread zimoun
Hi Mike, On Thu, 27 Feb 2020 at 02:23, Mike Gerwitz wrote: > Ah, for the record, I had searched for pandoc using `guix package -s > pandoc` in the past and didn't find what I was looking for, and so fell > back to a Debian system. It turns out what I wanted was ghc-pandoc > after all. Thank yo

bug#33844: Rename ghc-pandoc to pandoc

2020-02-26 Thread Mike Gerwitz
On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 12:23:14 +0200, Efraim Flashner wrote: > On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 11:06:30AM +0100, Pierre Neidhardt wrote: >> swedebu...@riseup.net writes: >> >> > Reason: it is used standalone to convert between formats. >> >> I agree. What do other people think? > > This is language sp

bug#33844: Rename ghc-pandoc to pandoc

2020-02-26 Thread Ricardo Wurmus
Pierre Neidhardt writes: > swedebu...@riseup.net writes: > >> Reason: it is used standalone to convert between formats. > > I agree. What do other people think? I agree. We should also rename all uses of ghc-pandoc in the same patch. -- Ricardo

bug#33844: Rename ghc-pandoc to pandoc

2020-02-26 Thread Efraim Flashner
On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 11:06:30AM +0100, Pierre Neidhardt wrote: > swedebu...@riseup.net writes: > > > Reason: it is used standalone to convert between formats. > > I agree. What do other people think? This is language specific, but like other language-specific packages this is a package peopl

bug#33844: Rename ghc-pandoc to pandoc

2020-02-26 Thread Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix
Pierre Neidhardt 写道： Reason: it is used standalone to convert between formats. I agree. What do other people think? [Thumbs-up emoji] Kind regards, T G-R signature.asc Description: PGP signature

bug#33844: Rename ghc-pandoc to pandoc

2020-02-26 Thread Pierre Neidhardt
swedebu...@riseup.net writes: > Reason: it is used standalone to convert between formats. I agree. What do other people think? -- Pierre Neidhardt https://ambrevar.xyz/ signature.asc Description: PGP signature

bug#33844: Rename ghc-pandoc to pandoc

2018-12-23 Thread swedebugia
Reason: it is used standalone to convert between formats. -- Cheers Swedebugia