Dear, On Wed, 09 Sep 2020 at 18:11, Ricardo Wurmus <rek...@elephly.net> wrote: > zimoun <zimon.touto...@gmail.com> writes:
>>> We should also rename all uses of ghc-pandoc in the same patch. The packages: … >> - rapicorn >> - ganeti >> - manuskript >> - emacs-org-web-tools >> - emacs-ox-pandoc >> - ruby-pandoc-ruby … now uses ’pandoc’ instead of ’ghc-pandoc’, see: c22c6de453 gnu: rapicorn: Use pandoc instead of ghc-pandoc. 885332832c gnu: ganeti: Use pandoc instead of ghc-pandoc. 5dc5a3116b gnu: manuskript: Use pandoc instead of ghc-pandoc. 991c61678b gnu: emacs-org-web-tools: Use pandoc instead of ghc-pandoc. d37279ee1e gnu: emacs-ox-pandoc: Use pandoc instead of ghc-pandoc. 8cc8e584ab gnu: ruby-pandoc-ruby: Use pandoc instead of ghc-pandoc. > If these packages only use the “pandoc” executable they should use the > “pandoc” package instead of “ghc-pandoc”. “ghc-pandoc” is only meant > for Haskell packages that use Pandoc as a library. This is a much rarer > case, so we can assume that most packages should use “pandoc” instead of > “ghc-pandoc”. The only non-Haskell package remaining is ’gnu/packages/mail.scm (muchsync)’. Once this package is done (see #43848 [1]), we should be able to close this bug, I guess. [1] <http://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/43848> All the best, simon
