On Wed, 07 Oct 2020 at 17:27, zimoun <zimon.touto...@gmail.com> wrote: > Dear, > > On Wed, 09 Sep 2020 at 18:11, Ricardo Wurmus <rek...@elephly.net> wrote: >> zimoun <zimon.touto...@gmail.com> writes: > >>>> We should also rename all uses of ghc-pandoc in the same patch. > > The packages: … > >>> - rapicorn >>> - ganeti >>> - manuskript >>> - emacs-org-web-tools >>> - emacs-ox-pandoc >>> - ruby-pandoc-ruby > > … now uses ’pandoc’ instead of ’ghc-pandoc’, see: > > c22c6de453 gnu: rapicorn: Use pandoc instead of ghc-pandoc. > 885332832c gnu: ganeti: Use pandoc instead of ghc-pandoc. > 5dc5a3116b gnu: manuskript: Use pandoc instead of ghc-pandoc. > 991c61678b gnu: emacs-org-web-tools: Use pandoc instead of ghc-pandoc. > d37279ee1e gnu: emacs-ox-pandoc: Use pandoc instead of ghc-pandoc. > 8cc8e584ab gnu: ruby-pandoc-ruby: Use pandoc instead of ghc-pandoc. > > >> If these packages only use the “pandoc” executable they should use the >> “pandoc” package instead of “ghc-pandoc”. “ghc-pandoc” is only meant >> for Haskell packages that use Pandoc as a library. This is a much rarer >> case, so we can assume that most packages should use “pandoc” instead of >> “ghc-pandoc”. > > The only non-Haskell package remaining is ’gnu/packages/mail.scm > (muchsync)’. Once this package is done (see #43848 [1]), we should be > able to close this bug, I guess.
Done by <http://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/43848#1>, see 8514dfdee6. Closing. Thanks, simon
