ebug outputs would primarily useful to
> people who are actively developing IceCat, in which case it makes more
> sense to build it manually to allow incremental rebuilds after modifying
> the source code.
I agree---I think it's best not to burden all users (that choose to or
have to build) in this case.
--
Mike Gerwitz
oc) but it is: a) some descriptions are badly written and
> b) the 'relevance' scoring function is not enough "smart" to detect
> them.
Thank you for taking the time to explain this.
--
Mike Gerwitz
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
e past and didn't find what I was looking for, and so fell
back to a Debian system. It turns out what I wanted was ghc-pandoc
after all.
But if I would have put a little bit more effort into looking, perhaps I
would have figured that out; I was in a hurry.
Thanks for making this change!
Sorry I hadn't seen this bug report; it was opened after I researched
this issue a couple months ago and I didn't bother checking since.
Here's the thread I posted to help-guix: <87lfwbuj27....@gnu.org>.
--
Mike Gerwitz
Free Software Hacker+Activist | GNU Maintainer &
close 34176
thanks
This is no longer a problem on my X200 with Libreboot.
On Sun, May 12, 2019 at 10:16:12 -0400, Mike Gerwitz wrote:
> In 5.x this doesn't appear to be a problem anymore---the first message
> still happens, but it no longer causes a panic. I don't know precise
On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 00:58:57 -0500, Mike Gerwitz wrote:
> usb usb3: root hub lost power or was reset
> general protection fault: [#1] SMP PTI
> CPU: 1 PID: 441 Comm: kworker/u4:23 Tainted: 6 4.28-3gnu #1
> Hardware name: LENOVO 7459VLP/7459VLP, BIOS CBET4000 3774c9
On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 02:02:34 -0500, Mark H Weaver wrote:
> reopen 34176
> thanks
>
> Hi Mike,
>
> Mike Gerwitz writes:
>
>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 07:14:15 -0500, Mike Gerwitz wrote:
>>> reopen 34176
>>> thanks
>>
>> I guess I don
On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 07:14:15 -0500, Mike Gerwitz wrote:
> reopen 34176
> thanks
I guess I don't have permission to do this, since nothing happened. Can
someone do this for me?
Alternatively, if this seems outside the scope of something we'd want to
track in Guix, just leave
reopen 34176
thanks
On Sun, Jan 27, 2019 at 10:34:11 -0500, Mike Gerwitz wrote:
> Sorry, I take that back. I could have sworn it did resolve the issue,
> but that does not seem to be the case.
>
> This seems unrelated to powertop; `auto' seems to be the default setting
> of
On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 01:08:39 -0500, Mike Gerwitz wrote:
> Right after sending this message, I recalled that I used powertop to do
> "auto tuning". Sure enough, one of the lines was this:
>
>Good Autosuspend for USB device UHCI Host Controller [usb6]
>
&
Well, I'm not getting those hours of my life back.
On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 00:58:57 -0500, Mike Gerwitz wrote:
> usb usb3: root hub lost power or was reset
[...]
> uhci_hcd :00:1d.0: host controller process error, something bad happened!
> uhci_hcd :00:1d.0: host controlle
matters.
(Which is indeed true for my hub :00:1d.0, which is usb6, according
to dmesg.)
If someone with more experience with these types of issues offer me some
advice on my next steps (including the best place to report upstream
either for linux-libre or linux, if that's more app
urther
issues. But it's bizarre indeed.
> I also note that Icecat tells me that the page is not encrypted, despite
> visiting the https site without errors. Something’s not quite right
> here.
Mark fixed this in 32833 (<87a7o5cdv3@netris.org>).
--
Mike Gerwitz
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 20:30:57 -0400, Mike Gerwitz wrote:
> Thanks again for your work on this. Maybe I'll let IceCat build
> overnight so I can give it a try tomorrow (still on my X200).
LGTM.
--
Mike Gerwitz
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
>> When you get a chance, can you try the new version and report back?
>
> I also verified that those pages render correctly using IceCat's alpha
> binary on a Debian system. I'll build overnight and let you know
> tomorrow if the CSS issues are resolved for
I'll let IceCat build
overnight so I can give it a try tomorrow (still on my X200).
--
Mike Gerwitz
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ld overnight and let you know
tomorrow if the CSS issues are resolved for me.
Thanks for the quick response on this!
--
Mike Gerwitz
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
> usually see only partially when some wired UTF-sign is not installed).
I run IceCat within a container, and I noticed that upgrading to 60
caused for me the issue that you are describing.
But if I run IceCat normally (as installed to my profile), fonts are
fine.
--
Mike Gerwitz
Free Software
not reporting security status correctly, then
users may be at risk, so be careful in the meantime!
--
Mike Gerwitz
Free Software Hacker+Activist | GNU Maintainer & Volunteer
GPG: D6E9 B930 028A 6C38 F43B 2388 FEF6 3574 5E6F 6D05
https://mikegerwitz.com
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
is even
visible in the Style Editor, but isn't rendered). Icecat isn't
providing any errors anywhere, and I didn't find anything useful in
strace output.
So hopefully enabling Servo fixes it! I'm curious to know why these
pages work but not others.
--
Mike Gerwi
on that, but in this virt-manager case, I did experience
the issue on GuixSD.
--
Mike Gerwitz
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Guix could then be helpful to the user without expecting the user to
have read all relevant sections of the manual (I have only read portions
so far). `guix package` maybe could also have a flag to automatically
install recommended packages into the user's profile.
There are strong desig
research.
I encountered this issue the same way (after a `guix gc').
> It also means each virtual machine may be running on an older version of
> qemu, for better or worse.
Yes, I was concerned by that as well. :X VMs would not benefit from
security fixes, which is to me is the more
king issues); try `--fallback' to
build derivation from source
--8<---cut here---end--->8---
I upgraded Guix last night (0181df537ffb4e4273b2ca005738fdb7bd3d73f5)
and tried again, but same problem tonight.
I can build from source, but that's
t;
> Can you confirm?
I just ran into this, and clearing ~/.cache/guile/ccache did indeed fix
it. Thanks.
--
Mike Gerwitz
Free Software Hacker+Activist | GNU Maintainer & Volunteer
GPG: D6E9 B930 028A 6C38 F43B 2388 FEF6 3574 5E6F 6D05
https://mikegerwitz.com
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
I don't know my
version atm. If you know the steps to run a suitable comparison, I'd be
happy to do so.
If you don't have it figured out by March I'll be at LP2018 if you want
to do a more hands-on comparison.
--
Mike Gerwitz
Free Software Hacker+Activist | GNU Maintainer &
pset Memory
Controller Hub (rev 07)
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Mobile 4 Series Chipset
Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 07)
00:02.1 Display controller: Intel Corporation Mobile 4 Series Chipset
Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 07)
I'm running Libreboot.
--
Mike
on is bad in general…
What about signed tags/commits?
--
Mike Gerwitz
Free Software Hacker+Activist | GNU Maintainer & Volunteer
GPG: D6E9 B930 028A 6C38 F43B 2388 FEF6 3574 5E6F 6D05
https://mikegerwitz.com
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
le and projects for their own purposes, but which we can use
because they are free software.
--
Mike Gerwitz
Free Software Hacker+Activist | GNU Maintainer & Volunteer
GPG: D6E9 B930 028A 6C38 F43B 2388 FEF6 3574 5E6F 6D05
Old: 2217 5B02 E626 BC98 D7C0 C2E5 F22B B815 8EE3 0EAB
https:
Follow-up Comment #4, sr #109104 (project administration):
Unfortunately, this hook can be easily defeated. Here's some example output
from the current tip of master:
$ git cat-file -p HEAD
tree c65e675351fe76b2630df24eddcb2449774eb344
parent e87c7ec2de815f05d7a84e2792e2da700bb26a38
author Leo
On Sun, Jun 05, 2016 at 15:39:04 -0500, Christopher Allan Webber wrote:
> One theoretical optimization: if I verify the DAG, could I store
> somewhere that I've verified from commit cabba6e and upward already, so
> the next time I verify it only has to verify the new commits?
tbh, I haven't given
le for the sake of invoking
GPG. It checks for a non-zero exit code and GOODSIG:
ret |= !strstr(pbuf->buf, "\n[GNUPG:] GOODSIG ");
--
Mike Gerwitz
Free Software Hacker+Activist | GNU Maintainer & Volunteer
https://mikegerwitz.com
FSF Member #5804 | GPG Key ID: 0x8EE30EAB
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
guix/manual/html_node/Substitutes.html
Oh, excellent; I'm not sure if I would have come across that. I should
poke around Guix a bit more and see all the goodies that everyone has
created.
Thanks.
--
Mike Gerwitz
Free Software Hacker+Activist | GNU Maintainer & Volunteer
https://mikegerwitz.com
made me uncomfortable without studying
whether Guile can make assurances that pointer-referenced data in
"secure" memory will never be copied anywhere else. I was going to
bring it up in the near future on the guile mailing list after I did
some research myself; no need to derail the discussion here.
--
Mike Gerwitz
Free Software Hacker+Activist | GNU Maintainer & Volunteer
https://mikegerwitz.com
FSF Member #5804 | GPG Key ID: 0x8EE30EAB
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
lly saying that it's really
hard to have strong cryptographic assurances with Git even with signed
commits---that attack surface is simply too large, as I mentioned in the
Whonix discussion. Realistically, it's extremely unlikely that
something will ever happen, but until Git switches
35 matches
Mail list logo