[bug #65716] afmtodit.tables omits many code points from glyphlist.txt

Follow-up Comment #8, bug #65716 (group groff): At 2024-09-22T07:20:13-0400, Deri James wrote: > Re-opened since Branden has not dealt with the fact that some of the > Adobe Glyphs which were originally in the PUA are now in the unicode > standard, if our glyph list was corrected with the current

[bug #65716] afmtodit.tables omits many code points from glyphlist.txt

Update of bug #65716 (group groff): Status: Fixed => None Open/Closed: Closed => Open ___ Follow-up Comment #7: Re-opened since Branden

[bug #65716] afmtodit.tables omits many code points from glyphlist.txt

Update of bug #65716 (group groff): Status: In Progress => Fixed Open/Closed:Open => Closed Planned Release:None => 1.24.0 __

[bug #65716] afmtodit.tables omits many code points from glyphlist.txt

Update of bug #65716 (group groff): Status:None => In Progress ___ Reply to this item at: ___ Message

[bug #65716] afmtodit.tables omits many code points from glyphlist.txt

Update of bug #65716 (group groff): Status: Need Info => None ___ Follow-up Comment #5: [comment #2 comment #2:] > Werner put that line in when he first checked in the script, in 2005. >

[bug #65716] afmtodit.tables omits many code points from glyphlist.txt

Update of bug #65716 (group groff): Assigned to:deri => gbranden ___ Follow-up Comment #4: I believe since Unicode 3.2 some of the glyphs Adobe had in the PUA got their own code points in the

[bug #65716] afmtodit.tables omits many code points from glyphlist.txt

Update of bug #65716 (group groff): Summary: We don't seem to be using the "latest" glyphlist.txt to generate the tables for afmtodit. => afmtodit.tables omits many code points from glyphlist.txt ___ Reply to this item at: