Follow-up Comment #8, bug #65716 (group groff): At 2024-09-22T07:20:13-0400, Deri James wrote: > Re-opened since Branden has not dealt with the fact that some of the > Adobe Glyphs which were originally in the PUA are now in the unicode > standard, if our glyph list was corrected with the current code > points, this change is not necessary. See comment #4 below.
Oh. Well, I guess this one will stay open indefinitely, then. Neither
of us seems to know of an authoritative source for the corrected code
points. If nobody's maintaining glyphlist.txt in this respect, then
that resource will need a successor. And maybe there isn't one.
Regards,
Branden
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?65716>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
