James Youngman wrote:
> Is there a reason not to just use ICU (http://icu.sourceforge.net/)?
ICU is complex code everywhere. It's IMO impossible to do a security audit
of ICU. Where functions with 600 lines of code are an exception in gnulib
(the striconveh module has such a function indeed), they
"James Youngman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 1/16/07, Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This will be used by the second part of the Unicode string library
>
>
> [...]
>
> Is there a reason not to just use ICU (http://icu.sourceforge.net/)?
See:
http://article.gmane.org/gm
On 1/16/07, Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
This will be used by the second part of the Unicode string library
[...]
Is there a reason not to just use ICU (http://icu.sourceforge.net/)?
James.
Hi,
This will be used by the second part of the Unicode string library: A
module for character set conversion of strings with error handling.
= modules/striconveh =
Description:
Character set conversion of strings with error handling, uses i
