"James Youngman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 1/16/07, Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> This will be used by the second part of the Unicode string library > > > [...] > > Is there a reason not to just use ICU (http://icu.sourceforge.net/)?
See: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.gnulib.bugs/8632 For what it's worth, I agree with those arguments. I have had the same reasons to avoid ICU in the past. I've had several bugs reported to me for LibIDN which turned out to be bugs in ICU (last time a few days ago), so I also have greater confidence in Bruno's code, and will try to start using some of it in LibIDN. /Simon
