Am Sa., 17. Aug. 2024 um 15:00 Uhr schrieb Bruno Haible :
> Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen wrote:
> > > This is fixed now.
> > >
> >
> > What about the shell-based gnulib tool? Or should I consider that one
> > deprecated?
>
> Yes. The shell-based implementation does not receive all bug-fixes and
> improv
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen wrote:
> > This is fixed now.
> >
>
> What about the shell-based gnulib tool? Or should I consider that one
> deprecated?
Yes. The shell-based implementation does not receive all bug-fixes and
improvements any more, and is deprecated.
Bruno
Simon Josefsson wrote:
> > 'valgrindtests' would be a hack.
>
> How so?
Because glueing together two words is not common in the English language.
> However I also realize that the name is quite well established and has
> been in the gnulib manual for a long time.
Yes.
> >> The naming was a cle
Hi!
Bruno Haible schrieb am Sa., 17. Aug. 2024, 11:14:
> Hi Simon,
>
> > Ouch. Shouldn't we rename 'valgrind-tests' instead?
> > ...
> > Whatever problem appears if we rename
> > 'valgrind-tests' to, say, 'valgrindtests' we could fix.
>
> 'valgrindtests' would be a hack.
>
> 'valgrind-support-f
Bruno Haible writes:
> Hi Simon,
>
>> Ouch. Shouldn't we rename 'valgrind-tests' instead?
>> ...
>> Whatever problem appears if we rename
>> 'valgrind-tests' to, say, 'valgrindtests' we could fix.
>
> 'valgrindtests' would be a hack.
How so? The old name was a hack because it hijacked the *-te
Hi Simon,
> Ouch. Shouldn't we rename 'valgrind-tests' instead?
> ...
> Whatever problem appears if we rename
> 'valgrind-tests' to, say, 'valgrindtests' we could fix.
'valgrindtests' would be a hack.
'valgrind-support-for-tests' would have the same problem.
'test-support-with-valgrind' would
Bruno Haible writes:
> Hi Marc,
>
> Please keep the mailing list in CC.
>
>> > Does it still do so if you remove the 'valgrind-tests' modules from the
>> > list?
>> >
>>
>> It does not.
>
> OK, then the problem is that gnulib-tool does not know that 'valgrind-tests'
> is special. Fixed like this
Hi Bruno,
Am Fr., 16. Aug. 2024 um 18:03 Uhr schrieb Bruno Haible :
> Hi Marc,
>
> Please keep the mailing list in CC.
>
This was due to my inability to use my email program properly.
> > > Does it still do so if you remove the 'valgrind-tests' modules from the
> > > list?
> > >
> >
> > It doe
Hi Marc,
Please keep the mailing list in CC.
> > Does it still do so if you remove the 'valgrind-tests' modules from the
> > list?
> >
>
> It does not.
OK, then the problem is that gnulib-tool does not know that 'valgrind-tests'
is special. Fixed like this.
We could have noticed the problem be
Hi Marc,
> Although I don't use gnulib with '--with-tests', it does create a tests/
> directory during bootstrap and fills it with a few files. I attached my
> gnulib-cache.m4.
Does it still do so if you remove the 'valgrind-tests' modules from the list?
Bruno
Hi!
Although I don't use gnulib with '--with-tests', it does create a tests/
directory during bootstrap and fills it with a few files. I attached my
gnulib-cache.m4.
Do you think I can prevent gnulib from creating the directory? Did I
include some module that makes it create the directory, or d
11 matches
Mail list logo
