Hi Simon, > Ouch. Shouldn't we rename 'valgrind-tests' instead? > ... > Whatever problem appears if we rename > 'valgrind-tests' to, say, 'valgrindtests' we could fix.
'valgrindtests' would be a hack. 'valgrind-support-for-tests' would have the same problem. 'test-support-with-valgrind' would reflect the meaning, but is a bit long. > The naming was a clever hack long time ago What did this naming attempt to achieve? > but this module always behaved bit weird > (e.g., creating an empty gnulib tests/ sub-directory if a package > doesn't use any gnulib test modules) This is fixed now. So, IMO, there is no need to rename the module any more. Bruno
