Re: wrong program name in posix-modules error message

2007-09-10 Thread Bruno Haible
Hi, > The error message that posix-modules displays if it cannot determine its > absolute path says > > > could not locate the gnulib-tool program - how did you invoke it? > > I think "gnulib-tool" should be "posix-modules". Thanks. Of course. Fixing it: 2007-09-10 Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROT

Re: autoconf enhancement for Interix

2007-09-10 Thread Noah Misch
On Sat, Sep 08, 2007 at 10:13:03PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote: > 2007-09-08 Eric Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Centralize all system extensions checks. > * lib/autoconf/specific.m4 (AC_USE_SYSTEM_EXTENSIONS): Inline code > from AC_AIX, AC_GNU_SOURCE, AC_MINIX. Add Interix support

wrong program name in posix-modules error message

2007-09-10 Thread mkraai
Howdy, The error message that posix-modules displays if it cannot determine its absolute path says > could not locate the gnulib-tool program - how did you invoke it? I think "gnulib-tool" should be "posix-modules". Matt P.S. Sorry for the footer. The server made the following annotations -

Re: underscores in gnulib file names

2007-09-10 Thread Bruno Haible
Paul Eggert wrote: > Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > - We can also use a "-in.h" suffix now. It smells the workaround (like > > "install-sh" which is a workaround for the intended "install.sh"), but > > it may be good enough. > > I prefer this solution to the "wait for DO

Re: underscores in gnulib file names

2007-09-10 Thread Karl Berry
>> - We can also use a "-in.h" suffix now. Fine by me.

Re: underscores in gnulib file names

2007-09-10 Thread Jim Meyering
Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> - We can also use a "-in.h" suffix now. It smells the workaround (like >> "install-sh" which is a workaround for the intended "install.sh"), but >> it may be good enough. > > I prefer this solution to t

Re: new modules 'malloc-posix', 'realloc-posix', 'calloc-posix'

2007-09-10 Thread Bruno Haible
Hello Eric, > It looks like you got this backwards. It is setting > gl_cv_func_malloc_posix=yes on mingw, no on cygwin, whereas it is only > mingw that is not posix-compliant. > ... > With the result that on cygwin, rpl_malloc ended up being instantiated, > and calling itself in infinite recursio

Re: underscores in gnulib file names

2007-09-10 Thread Paul Eggert
Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > - We can also use a "-in.h" suffix now. It smells the workaround (like > "install-sh" which is a workaround for the intended "install.sh"), but > it may be good enough. I prefer this solution to the "wait for DOS support to die" solution. Shou

Re: new modules 'malloc-posix', 'realloc-posix', 'calloc-posix'

2007-09-10 Thread Eric Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Bruno Haible on 9/9/2007 7:14 AM: > I take this as an OK to the proposal, so I'm committing the change, likewise > for malloc and realloc, without the renaming of modules (for now). > > # Test whether malloc, realloc, calloc are POSIX com