Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> - We can also use a "-in.h" suffix now. It smells the workaround (like >> "install-sh" which is a workaround for the intended "install.sh"), but >> it may be good enough. > > I prefer this solution to the "wait for DOS support to die" solution. > > Should I suggest it to RMS now? I don't want to bother him without > sufficient consensus.
I like it, too.
