Paul Eggert wrote: > Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > - We can also use a "-in.h" suffix now. It smells the workaround (like > > "install-sh" which is a workaround for the intended "install.sh"), but > > it may be good enough. > > I prefer this solution to the "wait for DOS support to die" solution.
It depends how long this waiting period is. Maybe they have already decided to drop DOS support for Emacs 23, and we don't know? Let me ask Eli Zaretskii (by private mail); I'll report his answer. > Should I suggest it to RMS now? I don't want to bother him without > sufficient consensus. Can you please wait a day or two until we get this answer? Bruno