Hi Kacper,
thanks, fixed in SVN 378.
/// Jürgen
On 07/15/2014 09:49 PM, Kacper Gutowski wrote:
On 2014-07-15 20:09:40, Juergen Sauermann wrote:
Except that (not so obviously) :
1E¯15 = 1E¯14
0
Sorry, my mistake. You're, of course, right.
Current (r376) behaviour seems to be correc
On 2014-07-15 20:09:40, Juergen Sauermann wrote:
> Except that (not so obviously) :
>
>
> 1E¯15 = 1E¯14
> 0
Sorry, my mistake. You're, of course, right.
Current (r376) behaviour seems to be correct with one exception:
1E¯15 = 1E¯14
0
1E¯15J0 = 1E¯14J0
1
Both should be zero,
Hi Kacper,
thanks , fixed in SVN 376.
Except that (not so obviously) :
* 1E¯15 = 1E¯14
0
*
**/// Jürgen
On 07/15/2014 11:55 AM, Kacper Gutowski wrote:
When either of arguments of = has imaginary part of magnitude greater
than comparison tolerance, a domain error is thrown.
⎕CT
When either of arguments of = has imaginary part of magnitude greater
than comparison tolerance, a domain error is thrown.
⎕CT
1E¯13
0J1 = 0J1
DOMAIN ERROR
0J1=0J1
^ ^
There are no conditions under which = is allowed to throw a domain
error at all so this is serious.
W
