Hi Kacper, thanks, fixed in SVN 378.
/// Jürgen On 07/15/2014 09:49 PM, Kacper Gutowski wrote:
On 2014-07-15 20:09:40, Juergen Sauermann wrote:Except that (not so obviously) : 1E¯15 = 1E¯14 0Sorry, my mistake. You're, of course, right. Current (r376) behaviour seems to be correct with one exception: 1E¯15 = 1E¯14 0 1E¯15J0 = 1E¯14J0 1 Both should be zero, because it's exactly the same number. -k