HI,
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 22:22, David Nelson wrote:
> Otherwise, I was only going to add a clause about transferring TDF's
> funds into my personal bank account every 6 months...
For those of you that didn't realise, that was a joke... Someone just
mailed me off-list who didn't seem quite sure
Hi :)
Thanks :) The voting system sounds interesting. I like the idea of
"non-binding" votes for people that might not have joined as proper members yet
but might have significant interest in the Apache Foundation.
Thanks and regards from
Tom :)
From: Greg S
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 16:32, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
>...
> I think I had the opportunities, as a guest fof he incubator mailing
> list to expression my opinions and sometimes more ;-)
> At this point, I feel it would be over-staying my welcome to interject
> myself in an Apache procedural vote.
Hi :)
I am sure you are welcome to stay in even if it's only to help iron-out any
misunderstandings as they arise but if you don't feel comfortable then don't.
Sounds like you have been doing good work :)
Regards from
Tom :)
From: Norbert Thiebaud
To: steer
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 3:09 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I just wanted to bring an "FYI" that the Apache Incubator has begun
> its voting process on accepting the OO.o proposal to become a
> "podling" within the Incubator.
Thanks for the update
[...]
> If you wish to make your voice heard
Hi all,
I just wanted to bring an "FYI" that the Apache Incubator has begun
its voting process on accepting the OO.o proposal to become a
"podling" within the Incubator. At the moment, it appears to be
passing by a huge margin, with only two dissenting votes[1] at this
time.
The Apache process re
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 7:30 AM, Dave Neary wrote:
> Hi,
>
Thanks for the explanations...
[...]
> Then we communicate the anonymous token to the voter, and tell him to
> write it down somewhere so that he can check his vote later.
how does one figure out what information is in the token ?
iow. gi
Hi,
Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 4:07 AM, Michael Meeks
> wrote:
>>I strongly suggest we simply copy the GNOME process here; this
>> generates a unique random key per person which is mailed out, and used
>> instead of a name when voting; thus the voting record can be
Hi,
Em 10-06-2011 08:32, Simon Phipps escreveu:
> On 10 Jun 2011, at 12:22, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>
>> Italo Vignoli wrote:
>>> http://www.v3.co.uk/v3-uk/news/2077963/libreoffice-ready-commercial-distribution-months-document-foundation
>>> http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/2077979/document
On 6/10/11 1:32 PM, Simon Phipps wrote:
The lesson I have learned is that I should treat each error in an article where
I am the source as my own failure to present the information in a way that was
effective for the journalist. On the other hand, as a journalist I always
appreciate rapid, p
On 10 Jun 2011, at 12:22, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> Italo Vignoli wrote:
>> http://www.v3.co.uk/v3-uk/news/2077963/libreoffice-ready-commercial-distribution-months-document-foundation
>> http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/2077979/document-foundation-promises-enterprise-ready-libreoffice-augu
Italo Vignoli wrote:
> http://www.v3.co.uk/v3-uk/news/2077963/libreoffice-ready-commercial-distribution-months-document-foundation
> http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/2077979/document-foundation-promises-enterprise-ready-libreoffice-august
It's great to see that the LibreOffice download siz
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 4:07 AM, Michael Meeks wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2011-06-08 at 07:02 +0300, David Nelson wrote:
> I strongly suggest we simply copy the GNOME process here; this
> generates a unique random key per person which is mailed out, and used
> instead of a name when voting; thus t
Hi,
Michael Meeks wrote:
> It is possible that Maemo re-used the code and made it more generic;
> not sure - Dave might know (?).
When I got it, the code had the anonymous token/voter token system for
anonymising votes already, but used the old "pick N, and we aggregate
all the choices to g
Two articles from yesterday interview. I have commented stating that
LibreOffice 3.3.2 is already available for corporate deployments, as I
was quite clear during the interview.
Original Message
Subject: Thanks for the interview today
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 21:41:26 -0700
From:
On Wed, 2011-06-08 at 07:02 +0300, David Nelson wrote:
> I remember that, some time ago, Michael Meeks suggested OpenSTV as a
> tool (http://www.openstv.org/).
Right. STV (Meek) is a key part of the election and bylaws since it
produces a 'fair' result; it requires ranking the candidates.
Hi,
Charles-H. Schulz wrote on 2011-06-10 09.56:
Works for me, but is there anything else to change? :-)
I hope for some more deputies to vote on the time ;)
Florian
--
Florian Effenberger
Steering Committee and Founding Member of The Document Foundation
Tel: +49 8341 99660880 | Mobile: +4
Hi,
2011/6/10 Florian Effenberger
> Hello,
>
> Florian Effenberger wrote on 2011-06-03 15.06:
>
>
> http://www.doodle.com/bqcd2u4g5w5nfzqr
>>>
>>
>> ideally, I would like to have feedback from all SC seat holders *and*
>> their deputies. So, about 12 voices are still missing in the poll. :-)
>>
Hello,
Florian Effenberger wrote on 2011-06-03 15.06:
http://www.doodle.com/bqcd2u4g5w5nfzqr
ideally, I would like to have feedback from all SC seat holders *and*
their deputies. So, about 12 voices are still missing in the poll. :-)
I will close the poll by Monday morning (German time). Ri
19 matches
Mail list logo
