Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: FedCM Button Mode API and Use Other Account API

2024-07-09 Thread Yi Gu
Hello API owners! Quick update: we didn't start the OT on desktop until M125 and haven't started the OT on Android yet. Therefore we propose to update the estimated milestones to: desktop: M125 - M130 inclusive Android: M128 - M130 inclusive WDYT? Regards, Yi On Tue, Apr 9, 2024 at 12:33 AM Yoa

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: FedCM Button Mode API and Use Other Account API

2024-07-09 Thread Yoav Weiss (@Shopify)
That's fine. No re-approval is needed On Tue, Jul 9, 2024 at 3:12 PM Yi Gu wrote: > Hello API owners! > > Quick update: we didn't start the OT on desktop until M125 and haven't > started the OT on Android yet. Therefore we propose to update the estimated > milestones to: > desktop: M125 - M130 i

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: FedCM Button Mode API and Use Other Account API

2024-07-09 Thread Yi Gu
Thanks Yoav! On Tue, Jul 9, 2024 at 9:39 AM Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) wrote: > That's fine. No re-approval is needed > > On Tue, Jul 9, 2024 at 3:12 PM Yi Gu wrote: > >> Hello API owners! >> >> Quick update: we didn't start the OT on desktop until M125 and haven't >> started the OT on Android yet.

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Deprecate and Relaunch: CHIPS on WebView

2024-07-09 Thread Vladimir Levin
On Fri, Jun 28, 2024, 16:28 'Dylan Cutler' via blink-dev < blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: > Hey Vlad, > > Thanks for your response. I have completed the analysis and have some > results to report. I also have created the Chromestatus > entry as r

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Partitioning Storage, Service Workers, and Communication APIs

2024-07-09 Thread Mike Taylor
Hi Brett, We don't yet have an expiration date set for https://chromeenterprise.google/policies/#DefaultThirdPartyStoragePartitioningSetting, or any concrete plans to add one. If and when we do decide to deprecate it, we'll give a 6 months deprecation notice through the normal enterprise poli

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Extend Experiment: WebAssembly JS String Builtins

2024-07-09 Thread Emanuel Ziegler
Thanks for taking a look! The progress is in alignment with the Wasm spec process requirements. Please see my answers below where I provide more background. On Mon, Jul 8, 2024 at 6:04 AM Domenic Denicola wrote: > > > On Thu, Jul 4, 2024 at 2:50 AM Emanuel Ziegler > wrote: > >> Dear API owners,

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Extend Experiment: WebAssembly JS String Builtins

2024-07-09 Thread Domenic Denicola
Thanks for clarifying the Wasm process. It sounds like there's some mismatch between its more lax requirements, and the requirements of the Blink process for shipping things in Chromium, and in particular the requirements for extending an experiment. It sounds like it would be easy to make progres

[blink-dev] Re: fetch API and filesystem: URLs (a Manifest v3 migration blocker)

2024-07-09 Thread Adam Rice
Interesting point. It affects the whole render process. On Tue, 9 Jul 2024 at 10:13, Nigel Tao wrote: > On Mon, Jul 8, 2024 at 5:05 PM Adam Rice wrote: > > It's possible to enable schemes for Fetch using code similar to > https://source.chromium.org/chromium/chromium/src/+/main:extensions/rende