OK as long as you can migrate the backup from an old computer to a new one.
Maybe in the future we can provide a migration tool, but until then ...
You are right, the battery should be a standard option not an advanced one.
Regards,
Dan
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 1:26 PM, Bart wrote:
> OK should
OK should be possible to implement, I take a slight variation to your
proposal and write the possibility to include another folder based on your
recommendations. We avoid the possibility that someone accidentally make a
new snapshot into that folder, and even (in a worse-case scenario)
smart-remove
Hi,
We can recommend not to backup using advanced features. But for the moment
this is easy to do and can help migration from one computer to another.
I see it like a dialog with a checkbox to enable/disable and the 3 combos:
host, user, profile. Each combo will update based on other.
Ex: host co
I actually meant to include the --delete-excluded again, as I guess that
would solve the ghost folders problem :-)
-> I once removed it because it caused breaking of the hardlinks, especially
between different scheduled tasks.
So you mean you should be able to include snapshot folders from other
l
Hi,
"
> 2. In settings for the shapshots path there should be "Advanced options" to
> force host/user/profile.
>
I do not get what you mean completely? Do you mean that you should be able
to set these values?
"
Imagine you want to backup one computer and restore it to another (or just
another us
2009/12/1 Dan
> Hi,
>
> I agree for the beta release.
> There are 2 repositories on BIT website: testing & release. We ca put the
> beta in testing.
>
> OK! Good idea!
>
> On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Bart wrote:
>
>> Hey all,
>>
>> I support a new release: the sooner the better, because a
Hi,
I agree for the beta release.
There are 2 repositories on BIT website: testing & release. We ca put the
beta in testing.
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Bart wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I support a new release: the sooner the better, because a lot of bugs and
> questions that are now appearing a
Hey all,
I support a new release: the sooner the better, because a lot of bugs and
questions that are now appearing are already saved or implemented! But it
might still be a good idea to launch a beta first, for a couple of weeks. I
think we should do that not on our official repository but more a
Hi Dan,
I looked at the ionice option when I first came to BiT, but I didn't work on
it, no.
I see where the schedule per included setting causes a lot of headache. Now
that BiT has profiles support this option is most likely not needed any more
so I support it's removal.
The part I was working
Hi,
Richard, maybe I'm wrong, but didn't you worked on using ionice option ?
(I'm talking about https://bugs.launchpad.net/backintime/+bug/482931)
Then I'm restarting the debate about schedule per included directory.
The implementation is tricky and it can break things.
There can be a snapshot co
Hi guys,
I agree, I think BiT is getting really close for a 1.0 release. I would like
to finish my work on the Hour of Backup choice though to make it into 1.0. I
haven't had a chance to finish it yet because of work and then my computer
died. I should be back up on my feet by this week.
- Richar
Hi Bart & Richard,
What do you think, are we ready for the release ?
Is there anything you want to change for this release ?
I think 1.0 can be a nice Christmas gift :)
Best regards,
Dan
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~bit-team
Post to : bi
12 matches
Mail list logo
